Liberal Protest In Pittsburg

That's completely false. Hitler came to power by aligning himself with two smaller parties of the right: the German National People's Party and the Centre Party.

So far you agree he aligned himself with someone, go check it out, you dont know what your talking about, what I speak of is in every decent history book, unless the book is printed in Moscow.

Jonah Goldberg isn't a history book.

Militant Islam Monitor: One of the "every decent history books."


lol.
 
Last edited:
Well, after doing a little research I've found a couple of sources that point to early Nazi-Communist collusion as being true, including this wikipedia entry.

My response: BFD.


It's still also a fact that Communists in Germany were ultimately criminalized by the National Socialists and put in concentration camps.
 
Well, after doing a little research I've found a couple of sources that point to early Nazi-Communist collusion as being true, including this wikipedia entry.

My response: BFD.


It's still also a fact that Communists in Germany were ultimately criminalized by the National Socialists and put in concentration camps.

They used whatever means possible to take control. Once in control, those former "alliances" were out the window.
 
Well, after doing a little research I've found a couple of sources that point to early Nazi-Communist collusion as being true, including this wikipedia entry.

My response: BFD.


It's still also a fact that Communists in Germany were ultimately criminalized by the National Socialists and put in concentration camps.

They used whatever means possible to take control. Once in control, those former "alliances" were out the window.

Just like the Hitler and the SA. I wonder how many here are familiar with the Night of the Long Knives.
 
Well, after doing a little research I've found a couple of sources that point to early Nazi-Communist collusion as being true, including this wikipedia entry.

My response: BFD.


It's still also a fact that Communists in Germany were ultimately criminalized by the National Socialists and put in concentration camps.

I know the history of Germany, what you state is true.

I never said nor posted that the Nazis did not put the communists in the concentration camps.
 
Do you cherish and honor murder, death, starvation, tyranny and torture?

I'll answer your question first, then I'll ask my question again.

No, I don't cherish/honour murder, death, starvation, tyranny and torture.

Now, do Marxists disgust you?

Marxism is a Disease. It's not about being angry, but Wary. Disgust might apply.

A disease? Wary? It's just a set of ideas, no need to be frightened of it.
 
Do you cherish and honor murder, death, starvation, tyranny and torture?

I'll answer your question first, then I'll ask my question again.

No, I don't cherish/honour murder, death, starvation, tyranny and torture.

Now, do Marxists disgust you?

Considering the killing fields, the gulags, the german marxists that formed a coalition with the Nazis, the tens of millions dead, yes everything that Marxism has destroyed and killed disgusts me.

I am glad that we both are disgusted by Marxists.

Marxists don't disgust me, they may disgust you but that's your business.
 
Well, after doing a little research I've found a couple of sources that point to early Nazi-Communist collusion as being true, including this wikipedia entry.

My response: BFD.


It's still also a fact that Communists in Germany were ultimately criminalized by the National Socialists and put in concentration camps.

They used whatever means possible to take control. Once in control, those former "alliances" were out the window.

So watch out you Obama Supporters :rofl: :lol:

Emma you soooooo set that one up for me :)
 
Well, after doing a little research I've found a couple of sources that point to early Nazi-Communist collusion as being true, including this wikipedia entry.

My response: BFD.


It's still also a fact that Communists in Germany were ultimately criminalized by the National Socialists and put in concentration camps.

Nazi's were territorial and did not like competition.
 
That's a huge stretch.

Its not a stretch, its a fact of history, so where is your information, cant post none, not when your ignorance turns into a willful lie.

Saying that both the Nazis and the KDP voted no confidence is the SDP-led Prussian government is a fact of history. Saying that occurred because the Nazis and the KDP were an alliance is nonsense. It would be like saying that if the other parties in Canada got together and voted no confidence is Harper's government, that would mean they're all the same.
 
That's a huge stretch.

Its not a stretch, its a fact of history, so where is your information, cant post none, not when your ignorance turns into a willful lie.

Saying that both the Nazis and the KDP voted no confidence is the SDP-led Prussian government is a fact of history. Saying that occurred because the Nazis and the KDP were an alliance is nonsense. It would be like saying that if the other parties in Canada got together and voted no confidence is Harper's government, that would mean they're all the same.

Now you got something to say, where you in all those other posts I challenged you on?

So you are defending the Marxist?

Why not post the history you speak of, you can not reduce the decades of Marxist/Russian history in Germany to a simple one liner which is nothing more than your twisting of facts. Hell, you were intent to just joke until someone else confirmed the facts I posted.

Marxism is so important to the Obama followers look how they got to lie about the facts of history, facts easily proven.
 
Its not a stretch, its a fact of history, so where is your information, cant post none, not when your ignorance turns into a willful lie.

Saying that both the Nazis and the KDP voted no confidence is the SDP-led Prussian government is a fact of history. Saying that occurred because the Nazis and the KDP were an alliance is nonsense. It would be like saying that if the other parties in Canada got together and voted no confidence is Harper's government, that would mean they're all the same.

Now you got something to say, where you in all those other posts I challenged you on?

So you are defending the Marxist?

Why not post the history you speak of, you can not reduce the decades of Marxist/Russian history in Germany to a simple one liner which is nothing more than your twisting of facts. Hell, you were intent to just joke until someone else confirmed the facts I posted.

Marxism is so important to the Obama followers look how they got to lie about the facts of history, facts easily proven.

Not for long the way things are headed.:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:
 
Its not a stretch, its a fact of history, so where is your information, cant post none, not when your ignorance turns into a willful lie.

Saying that both the Nazis and the KDP voted no confidence is the SDP-led Prussian government is a fact of history. Saying that occurred because the Nazis and the KDP were an alliance is nonsense. It would be like saying that if the other parties in Canada got together and voted no confidence is Harper's government, that would mean they're all the same.

Now you got something to say, where you in all those other posts I challenged you on?

So you are defending the Marxist?

Why not post the history you speak of, you can not reduce the decades of Marxist/Russian history in Germany to a simple one liner which is nothing more than your twisting of facts. Hell, you were intent to just joke until someone else confirmed the facts I posted.

Marxism is so important to the Obama followers look how they got to lie about the facts of history, facts easily proven.

Pointing out what actually happened is not defending Marxism any more than saying Hitler didn't kill everyone in sight isn't defending Nazism. The fact of the matter is you're tried to take a single vote were the KPD and the Nazis agreed (no confidence in the Prussian government) and claimed that means the KDP and the Nazis were in an alliance. That claim makes absolutely no sense. After coming to power, one of the first acts undertaken by the Nazis was to arrest members of the KDP. If they were working together, why the hell would they have done that?
 
Saying that both the Nazis and the KDP voted no confidence is the SDP-led Prussian government is a fact of history. Saying that occurred because the Nazis and the KDP were an alliance is nonsense. It would be like saying that if the other parties in Canada got together and voted no confidence is Harper's government, that would mean they're all the same.

Now you got something to say, where you in all those other posts I challenged you on?

So you are defending the Marxist?

Why not post the history you speak of, you can not reduce the decades of Marxist/Russian history in Germany to a simple one liner which is nothing more than your twisting of facts. Hell, you were intent to just joke until someone else confirmed the facts I posted.

Marxism is so important to the Obama followers look how they got to lie about the facts of history, facts easily proven.

Pointing out what actually happened is not defending Marxism any more than saying Hitler didn't kill everyone in sight isn't defending Nazism. The fact of the matter is you're tried to take a single vote were the KPD and the Nazis agreed (no confidence in the Prussian government) and claimed that means the KDP and the Nazis were in an alliance. That claim makes absolutely no sense. After coming to power, one of the first acts undertaken by the Nazis was to arrest members of the KDP. If they were working together, why the hell would they have done that?

During that time period, didn't the Marxist's seek Solidarity with Unions throughout the World? Through the Unions, Marxism was advanced, then as now.
 
Some orthodox Marxists see unions as tools of the bourgeoisie, in the same way they have contempt for social democratic parties. The contempt goes the other way too.

I think you'd be hard pressed to identify too many unions around the world - that gives you a broad canvas - as Marxist.
 
Some orthodox Marxists see unions as tools of the bourgeoisie, in the same way they have contempt for social democratic parties. The contempt goes the other way too.

I think you'd be hard pressed to identify too many unions around the world - that gives you a broad canvas - as Marxist.

Those that rise in power become the new Bourgeoisie, the merits are different, thats all.

You We are all equal, even though some are just more Equal than Others Comrade. Natural Law violated again, and again, and again, Parasites laying claim to other peoples labor at the barrel of a gun.
 
Some orthodox Marxists see unions as tools of the bourgeoisie, in the same way they have contempt for social democratic parties. The contempt goes the other way too.

I think you'd be hard pressed to identify too many unions around the world - that gives you a broad canvas - as Marxist.

Those that rise in power become the new Bourgeoisie, the merits are different, thats all.

You We are all equal, even though some are just more Equal than Others Comrade. Natural Law violated again, and again, and again, Parasites laying claim to other peoples labor at the barrel of a gun.

And laying that claim in the form of their VOTES, since they're too fucking LAZY to work for it themselves.

Liberalism is too easy. Claim to be a victim, and watch the checks roll in at the expense of your countrymen.
 

Forum List

Back
Top