🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Liberal Protest In Pittsburg

You're not making sense.

If you want them to be liberals, then fine... they're liberals. If that makes you all happy, it's all good.

But they aren't socialists and they aren't communists.
And I didn't say they were socialists or communists. That's a strawman.

It's as if you think your posts exist in a vacuum.

Once again, it is part of our system. Socialists and communists are anti-capitalism.
It's plain English and in no way does it logiocally imply that the the protesters (anarchists) are socialists and/or communists.

Yet, this is the same idioitc reasoning that so many on the left have been counting on for other recent events.

No wonder it's what the left thinks. So many of them simply don't think.
 
Capitalism is part of our system. It's all Michael Moore's hate speech inciting this. How could it not be? His film was just released. No coincidence there.

Once again, capitalism is not government.
Not what I said.

Once again, it is part of our system. Socialists and communists are anti-capitalism. Michael Moore's newly released film is anti-capitalism. He is inciting this violence. Hate Speech.


Exactly. Mikey Moore railles against that which he feed from...and he makes excuses for it...as do his zombie mindless followers.

Moore is a worthless shitstain in the crotch of society.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0es7zNq_6-M&feature=player_embedded"]MIKEY MOORE[/ame]

And what alot of these protestors don't understand? They'd be NOTHING, ZERO without their Freedom/Liberty that the Constitution guarantees...and that includes the ability/promise of a FREE MARKET that they so hate.

I'd say these people are extremely conflicted. They WANT Government control. But you know what they say? Careful what you wish for...you just may get it.

If they succeed? Then so goes their ability to PROTEST, make their OWN decisions, and Liberty itself.

Liberty is an all or nothing proposition. And it should never be parsed out by ANY Government.
 
And I didn't say they were socialists or communists. That's a strawman.

It's as if you think your posts exist in a vacuum.

Once again, it is part of our system. Socialists and communists are anti-capitalism.
It's plain English and in no way does it logiocally imply that the the protesters (anarchists) are socialists and/or communists.

Yet, this is the same idioitc reasoning that so many on the left have been counting on for other recent events.

No wonder it's what the left thinks. So many of them simply don't think.

It either implies it, or you're injecting unrelated topics randomly into the middle of the discussion.
 
Anarchist wannabes exercising their Constitutional right to assemble and protest :lol:

Not to worry. By Monday they'll be back in class, stickin' to da man :rofl:

If they considered these protesters as conservative, they'd be pissing and moaning about "Obama's jackbooted fascist thugs putting down patriotic Americans for daring to speak out".
 
Anarchist wannabes exercising their Constitutional right to assemble and protest :lol:

Not to worry. By Monday they'll be back in class, stickin' to da man :rofl:

If they considered these protesters as conservative, they'd be pissing and moaning about "Obama's jackbooted fascist thugs putting down patriotic Americans for daring to speak out".

My daughter was reading over my shoulder and commented that the right is closer to anarchism than the left because after all, "aren't they the ones who are always yelling for less government?"

Smart kid ;)
 
It's as if you think your posts exist in a vacuum.
It's plain English and in no way does it logiocally imply that the the protesters (anarchists) are socialists and/or communists.

Yet, this is the same idioitc reasoning that so many on the left have been counting on for other recent events.

No wonder it's what the left thinks. So many of them simply don't think.

It either implies it, or you're injecting unrelated topics randomly into the middle of the discussion.
In no way does it LOGICALLY imply what you inperpret.

And that is the fundamental problem.

You mentioned my statement existing in a vacuum. YOU filled in any missing connections with your feelings, and not any logical thought.

When analytical language depends so much on feelings, the message is no where near concise. And, when rhetoric based on appeals to emotions is so prevalent, the rhetoric of the analysis itself is too weak to stand on its own.
 
notice these little pansies had to cover their faces with little black masks.. cowards is the best thing to call them.

Anarchist wannabes. Which is actually quite ironic that they would organize as that kinda goes against the whole idea of anarchy, eh?

The police appearing in riot gear just feeds into their idiocy. What they should have done is let them march down the street chanting their nonsense, but block off all roads leading to the area where they were marching, so no spectators or media could get near them. I guarantee you it would have fizzled out in minutes...

And what's with the rolling dumpsters? Other than that and shouting BS back at the computerized police warnings, what did they do that was so horrible?

Well... I take that back. That was a horrible protest. They need to watch some archive footage of the 60's anti-war and civil rights protests. Now THOSE were the days lol. These brats are just a bunch of pussies; probably think a molotov cocktail is a Russian martini.

*Sigh* those were the days - people knew how to protest back then :D
 
It's plain English and in no way does it logiocally imply that the the protesters (anarchists) are socialists and/or communists.

Yet, this is the same idioitc reasoning that so many on the left have been counting on for other recent events.

No wonder it's what the left thinks. So many of them simply don't think.

It either implies it, or you're injecting unrelated topics randomly into the middle of the discussion.
In no way does it LOGICALLY imply what you inperpret.

And that is the fundamental problem.

You mentioned my statement existing in a vacuum. YOU filled in any missing connections with your feelings, and not any logical thought.

When analytical language depends so much on feelings, the message is no where near concise. And, when rhetoric based on appeals to emotions is so prevalent, the rhetoric of the analysis itself is too weak to stand on its own.

No, I never claimed your post exists in a vacuum. I said you think it does (which is pretty obvious by your continued argument that your statement should be read independent of any context).
 
It either implies it, or you're injecting unrelated topics randomly into the middle of the discussion.
In no way does it LOGICALLY imply what you inperpret.

And that is the fundamental problem.

You mentioned my statement existing in a vacuum. YOU filled in any missing connections with your feelings, and not any logical thought.

When analytical language depends so much on feelings, the message is no where near concise. And, when rhetoric based on appeals to emotions is so prevalent, the rhetoric of the analysis itself is too weak to stand on its own.

No, I never claimed your post exists in a vacuum. I said you think it does (which is pretty obvious by your continued argument that your statement should be read independent of any context).
I don't think it does at all. I used the same bullshit suggestions that the crazed libs have used with respect to the recent crime in KY. I just counted on the non-thinkers to make their own conclusions.

And, sure to form, they did.
 
2 million American tea party protestors go to Washington to protest the government they are peaceful and even clean up their trash before they leave..

Q: What do liberals call them?
A: NAZIS

Socialist anti-American, anti-capitalist maniacs go to g20 summit to "protest" they engage in destruction of private and public property, attack police and other acts of violence, and mayhem.

Q: What do liberals call them?
A: COMRADE!

2 million.......now thats funny.
 
Anarchism is a bit beyond my ken but I'm pretty sure the hardcore anarchists - and I don't mean people who chuck bombs (insert cartoon of early 20th Century "anarchist" stereotype) but have worked out the philosophy so that it's complex but mature thinking.

I'm pretty sure most Anarchists aren't Marxists.

As Kropotkin saw quite clearly, the rise of first social-democratic Marxism and then of Marxism-Leninism turned Marxism into an ideology of capitalist and socialist domination.

Found in:

Kropotkin, Self-valorization And The Crisis Of Marxism | libcom.org
 
Bill Ayers chucked bombs,, your chosen one's best bud, a radical anarchist liberal.. yep
 
Radical, yes. Anarchist, perhaps. But Ayers probably can't be an orthodox Marxist and an Anarchist. "Liberal", only if "liberal" is a general smear of anyone slightly to the left of centre.
 
Bill Ayers chucked bombs,, your chosen one's best bud, a radical anarchist liberal.. yep

So much is wrong with that statement...

1. Bill Ayers isn't an anarchist.
2. Bill Ayers doesn't have a relationship with the president, much less being his best friend.
3. The idea that liberals see Obama as the "chosen one" is pretty laughable coming from people who worship Reagan like a god.
 
Bill Ayers chucked bombs,, your chosen one's best bud, a radical anarchist liberal.. yep

So much is wrong with that statement...

1. Bill Ayers isn't an anarchist.
2. Bill Ayers doesn't have a relationship with the president, much less being his best friend.
3. The idea that liberals see Obama as the "chosen one" is pretty laughable coming from people who worship Reagan like a god.

the messiah,, self proclaimed "We are the one we've been waiting for." :lol:
 
Bill Ayers identifies himself as a Marxist. Nobody has to accuse him of being one.

Obama quotes a Marxists, Launches his political career in a Marxists home, has a father who is a Marxist, has a mentor who is a Marxist, appoints Marxists.

Quack, quack, quack, obama is a duck
 
Bill Ayers chucked bombs,, your chosen one's best bud, a radical anarchist liberal.. yep

So much is wrong with that statement...

1. Bill Ayers isn't an anarchist.
2. Bill Ayers doesn't have a relationship with the president, much less being his best friend.
3. The idea that liberals see Obama as the "chosen one" is pretty laughable coming from people who worship Reagan like a god.

I Protested Reagan. There is One God and it Isn't Obama Either.
 

Forum List

Back
Top