- Thread starter
- #21
8. " The straw that broke my subscription’s back came on Aug. 19, when Hamas violated yet another truce, sending a fusillade of rockets into Israel. The Wall Street Journal’s headline read, “Gaza Rocket Strikes End Cease Fire.”
A U.S. State Department spokesperson condemned the renewed rocket fire, holding Hamas responsible for causing the ceasefire to break down.
The Times headline: “Rockets From Gaza and Israeli Response Break Cease-Fire.”
Seriously? A newspaper that cannot distinguish between starting a fight and defending oneself is intellectually deficient, morally obtuse, and profoundly unworthy of its readers.
I know the Times won’t miss me. The feeling is mutual." http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/183412/why-im-unsubscribing-to-the-new-york-times
Now, the chicken and the egg question:
Which comes first, the Times providing lies by omission and by commission in order to pander to readers who are anti-Israel....
....or the less than astute actually believing the lies of the NYTimes?
A U.S. State Department spokesperson condemned the renewed rocket fire, holding Hamas responsible for causing the ceasefire to break down.
The Times headline: “Rockets From Gaza and Israeli Response Break Cease-Fire.”
Seriously? A newspaper that cannot distinguish between starting a fight and defending oneself is intellectually deficient, morally obtuse, and profoundly unworthy of its readers.
I know the Times won’t miss me. The feeling is mutual." http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/183412/why-im-unsubscribing-to-the-new-york-times
Now, the chicken and the egg question:
Which comes first, the Times providing lies by omission and by commission in order to pander to readers who are anti-Israel....
....or the less than astute actually believing the lies of the NYTimes?