He should pay the same percentage of his income as I do. Certainly not less.Why? Did he make exactly as much as you?
Yes.His benefits from government are proportionally greater than mine.
We should charge taxes based on that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
He should pay the same percentage of his income as I do. Certainly not less.Why? Did he make exactly as much as you?
Yes.His benefits from government are proportionally greater than mine.
We should charge taxes based on that?
He should pay the same percentage of his income as I do. Certainly not less.
Yes.
His income was substantial as were his deductions. I believe NY is investigating him for those deductions.He should pay the same percentage of his income as I do.
Good idea. What was his income that year?
How do you measure how much someone "benefits from government"
His income was substantial as were his deductions.
And the Leftists will howl because those deductions were LEGAL under the tax code, moron!His income was substantial as were his deductions. I believe NY is investigating him for those deductions.
As soon as he follows through on his campaign promise to release his tax records.Post the numbers.
And you know that because you're a tax attorney or because Trump claimed they were?And the Leftists will howl because those deductions were LEGAL under the tax code, moron!
As soon as he follows through on his campaign promise to release his tax records.
Trump's tax records are NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS!!!!And you know that because you're a tax attorney or because Trump claimed they were?
The story I heard was that he claimed on his federal taxes, a certain property was very valuable and took a huge deduction for setting it aside as a nature preserve. He also claimed that same property was not valuable for state property tax purposes. The courts may eventually have to decide if there was fraud or not.
Yet somehow these tax hikes for the rich always “trickle down” to the Middle Class. Trickle Down works!Still about 8% too light if it's on income over $100,000,000.00.
Huh, so you dont even live there. Interesting. You're probably the same guy who complains about Chicago murders every week but doesnt live there, and is tired of Hollywood weirdos giving their "woke" opinions yet cant stop posting about itUnbelievable. Let's see if those idiots continue to vote for democrats.
![]()
Top earning New Yorkers could face 61.2% combined tax rate under House plan, Californians may face 59% rate
The proposals include a 3% surtax on taxpayers earning more than $5 million a year. They would also raise the top marginal income tax rate to 39.6%.www.cnbc.com
You dont understand what trickle down means, do you?Yet somehow these tax hikes for the rich always “trickle down” to the Middle Class. Trickle Down works!
When have the Democrats ever done a Tax hike on “the Rich” and the Middle Class NOT saw their payroll taxes go up? Go ahead, name a Democrat President since Johnson where that has happened.You dont understand what trickle down means, do you?
Clinton's Omnibus Budget Reconcilliation Act of 1993 raised the top tax bracket from 31% to 39.6% on income above $250k. The payroll tax remained constant at 12.4%. The payroll tax rate was 12.4% from 1990 until 2010. Payroll Tax RatesWhen have the Democrats ever done a Tax hike on “the Rich” and the Middle Class NOT saw their payroll taxes go up? Go ahead, name a Democrat President since Johnson where that has happened.
Congratulations, you named one President. Now, ask yourself what was wrong with Carter, Obama, and soon Biden where the Middle Class had to take home less pay?Clinton's Omnibus Budget Reconcilliation Act of 1993 raised the top tax bracket from 31% to 39.6% on income above $250k. The payroll tax remained constant at 12.4%. The payroll tax rate was 12.4% from 1990 until 2010. Payroll Tax Rates
Anything else, dumbass?
The result is a top marginal federal income tax rate of 46.4%....for people making over FIVE MILLION...10 million as a coupleUnbelievable. Let's see if those idiots continue to vote for democrats.
![]()
Top earning New Yorkers could face 61.2% combined tax rate under House plan, Californians may face 59% rate
The proposals include a 3% surtax on taxpayers earning more than $5 million a year. They would also raise the top marginal income tax rate to 39.6%.www.cnbc.com
Hey dumbass the payroll tax dipped in 2010 and 2011 to 10.4% then went back up to the 12.4% number where it had been since 1990.Congratulations, you named one President. Now, ask yourself what was wrong with Carter, Obama, and soon Biden where the Middle Class had to take home less pay?
The rates don’t speak to the outcome. Incomes aren’t raising, make damn sure workers keep most of their take home pay.Hey dumbass the payroll tax dipped in 2010 and 2011 to 10.4% then went back up to the 12.4% number where it had been since 1990.
Now under Carter the tax increased from 9.9% to 10.16%. But from 1980 to 1988 the payroll tax increased under a REPUBLICAN from 10.16% to 12.12% in 1988. So what was wrong with Reagan when he LOWERED taxes on the rich yet RAISED the payroll tax on everyone?
Ask yourself that, dummy.
You are the one that brought up payroll tax, not me. You are the one claiming dems raised payroll taxes, not me. Now of course you backtrack after you discover Reagan raised payroll taxes.The rates don’t speak to the outcome. Incomes aren’t raising, make damn sure workers keep most of their take home pay.