danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #81
You know that isn't true. I have already read articles in newspapers about some chics being both ambitious and proactive about pursuing really really serious relationships, whenever there is sufficient capital involved under our form of capitalism. That is when Ruth starts wanting to get really really serious with us simply because she knows, and does not appeal to ignorance of the fact, that a lack of sex is grounds for annulment of especially, really really serious relationships.you should be more grateful, or at least complain less, since you are getting it for free, for now.Thank you for resorting to fallacy for your Cause, first, not second.
I’ve seen people like you before…but then I had to pay admission.
Well....at least we agree on its value.
Then don't complain. I usually just purchase a good time from a nice girl named Ginger who insists only bad girls lie to me and let me miss my turn for free, especially when I don't have enough money; whenever you chics play your games instead of getting really really serious about getting me to put out a really really serious relationship.
You know you have as much experience with girls as you do with logic or education: zero.
You couldn't attract a woman if you were a chocolate-covered millionaire handing out free shoes.