Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

[PoliticalChic]

"Liberal" in today's parlance, means just what 'communism' means.

That's easily documented when one compares the aims and desires of the current Democrat/Liberal establishment with the aims and desires of the CPUSA (Communist Party USA)

Taken to school and metaphorically whipped with a cane, she wrests away the cane and uses it to dig herself even deeper.



Now she can't distinguish between a political philosophy and a political party.

/continuously offtopic

Good to see you ran from the post, as you were unable to deny any of it.

As I predicted, your tenure in ignorance and indoctrination, prevents acceptance of the truth.

Oh I gave it the fifteen seconds of mockery it deserved. Wasn't worth any more than that.

I provided a documented, linked sourced post proving the point that there is hardly a difference between your political positions and those of Earl Browder.

"Earl Russell Browder (May 20, 1891 – June 27, 1973) was an American political activist and leader of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). Browder is best remembered as the General Secretary of the CPUSA during the 1930s and first half of the 1940s."
Earl Browder - Wikipedia

So far, you've pretended that the KKK wasn't created by the Democrats, and the party is racist to this day, and that Liberals don't yearn for the same conclusions for society as the communists did...

I leave it to readers of the several post to make their own conclusions about your inability to tell the truth.

What you 'provided' was the latest dropping in an endless diarrhea of off-topic TL;DRs that nobody pisses away their time reading because we all know there's no there there.

I haven't "pretended" the KKK wasn't created by the Democrats ---- I've stated it outright. In dripping detail complete with exact names, dates and places. And I've then invited any contradiction to those facts, and it's never happened. And such contradiction has never happened simply because it does not exist.

Now I'm sure it's all touchy-feely to live in a fantasy land where you just wish for whatever you'd like to have happened in the past but the world of Reality simply doesn't work that way.

Still not able to find any of my documented statements that you could truthfully deny....
...just more lies and pretense from one infamous for same.




....so, I'll have to slap you in the kisser again:

Alexander Trachtenberg... longtime activist in the Socialist Party of America and later in the Communist Party USA....

“When we get ready to take the United States, we will not take it under the label of communism; we will not take it under the label socialism. These labels are unpleasant to the American people, and have been speared too much. We will take the United States under labels we have made very lovable; we will take it under liberalism, under progressivism, under democracy. But, take it we will.”
~ Alexander Trachtenberg, at the National Convention of Communist Parties, Madison Square Garden, 1944
Trachtenberg worked tirelessly to gain a strangle hold on the culture....and to hide terms like Communist and Socialist.



And they will take it as long as they have enough loyal communists....er, Democrats like you.

 

[Syriusly]

LOL- National Socialism was very specifically a Nationalist movement.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

The National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), more commonly known as the Nazi Party, was a political party in Germany between 1920 and 1945. - Origins in the German Worker's Party.

Reference: jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/holocaust/nsdap.html..

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Of course the Nazis were socialists.

And their policies couldn't be more Liberal.

"The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the régime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.”[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible “for travellers’ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; ‘support’ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.”

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans “the highest possible standard of living.” National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia


Communists, Liberals, Socialists, Fascists, Nazis.....peas in a pod.

Spandexia continues to wallow in abject ignorance of what the term "Liberal" means. Let alone all the others of which she's equally clueless.

Wanna see some Liberals? Here's a hint:

​

OK, they do dress kinda weird. Granted.

"Liberal" in today's parlance, means just what 'communism' means.

That's easily documented when one compares the aims and desires of the current Democrat/Liberal establishment with the aims and desires of the CPUSA (Communist Party USA)

Here's today's lesson, you dolt:

How about you take a look at the aims of the Communist Party, USA, and the aims of the modern Democrat Party.


Watch, and note the consubstantial basis of both the aims of the Communist Party and the Democrat Party:

......it is ...extraordinary.....the correspondence between the aims of the communist party and the aims of the Democrats.....

1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.

3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

4. . Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.


5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.


11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce



Now....wouldn't an honest appraisal agree that all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive leaders?

I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals



You might take a look at this one, too.
10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.



"Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street - Shadowproof

And this:

"Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too.Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917(Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately."
Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.


They didn't call it ObamaCare....




....we are now free of that inordinate fear of communism.... Jimmy Carter Jimmy Carter: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - Address at Commencement Exercises at the University


President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” He urged those at a town hall eventin Buenos Aires, Argentina on Wednesday to “just choose from what works.”
Obama Downplays Difference Between Capitalism, Communism [VIDEO]





At your advanced age, of course, you will never admit that you have been manipulated to support Bolshevism....

.....but you have.

Does anyone ever actually read her stomach content spewing of partisan delusions?

 

[Syriusly]

Conservatism and nazism share the same core belief that their ideology is a panacea which should prevail above all others. In their respective [and diseased] minds, their ideology can do no wrong when practiced in its purist form.

By the way, national socialism (Nazism) and nationalism are not the same same thing. On the other side, national socialism is socialism. l.

LOL- National Socialism was very specifically a Nationalist movement.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

The National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), more commonly known as the Nazi Party, was a political party in Germany between 1920 and 1945. - Origins in the German Worker's Party.

Reference: jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/holocaust/nsdap.html..

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

"The Nazi Party embraced capitalism."

Another lie you were taught in government school.

LOL- yes I did go to school.

Clearly you didn't.

Capitalists made out like bandits in Nazi Germany- while socialists were locked up in Concentration camps.

https://coreyrobin.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/bel-2010-nazi-privatizations1.pdf

Great article on how the Nazi's privatized much of the public sector- including sectors that had previously been nationalized.

 

[Syriusly]

Name five who did so.

I'll help you with first one, you fill the blanks. Can you?

1. Strom Thurmond
2.
3.
4.
5.

The only one that matters:

Former KKK Leader David Duke Says 'Of Course' Trump Voters Are His Voters

He was Democrat until 1988, way way after "party switch" happened.

Try again.

Absolutely!

Throughout his formative years, when he learned to be a violent racist.....he was a Democrat.

So were you a Democrat then too? Just trying to figure out when you learned to be a violent racist.

Definition of racist: a conservative winning an argument with a Liberal.

I believe you have just documented that definition.

Definition of a PoliticalChic: a delusional partisan hate filled Conservative who is incapable of perceiving reality and spams regurgitated political nonsense.

I believe you have just documented that definition

 

[PoliticalChic]

The only one that matters:

Former KKK Leader David Duke Says 'Of Course' Trump Voters Are His Voters

He was Democrat until 1988, way way after "party switch" happened.

Try again.

Absolutely!

Throughout his formative years, when he learned to be a violent racist.....he was a Democrat.

So were you a Democrat then too? Just trying to figure out when you learned to be a violent racist.

Definition of racist: a conservative winning an argument with a Liberal.

I believe you have just documented that definition.

Definition of a PoliticalChic: a delusional partisan hate filled Conservative who is incapable of perceiving reality and spams regurgitated political nonsense.

I believe you have just documented that definition

Well.....I do hate ignorance....

See, I belong to The Alliance for an "Idiot-Free" America, and you're on the to-do list.

 

[deanrd]

Former KKK Leader David Duke Says 'Of Course' Trump Voters Are His Voters

I believe David Duke. I suspect he's telling the truth.

KKK, Confederates, Pedophilia, Alt Right

Yep, that's today's GOP.

You go Dave.

Tell it like it is.

 

[jillian]

Wonder why?

-Geaux
--------

The picture was taken during the 1924 Democratic Convention.

It was also known as “Klanbake.”

In Madison Square Garden, New York City, from June 24 to July 9, a dispute during came up revolving around an attempt by non-Klan delegates, led by Forney Johnston of Alabama, to condemn the organization for its violence in the Democratic Party’s platform.



Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

who says liberals aren't liking it, psychotroll?
everyone knows that the kkk used to be part of the dem party in the south. that's part of our history.

it's also part of our history that since the civil rights act passed, they all belong to you.

that's why the orange sociopath defended them.

but I still don't understand why you losers keep talking about 50 years ago when you own the kkk and the white supremacists today.

now be a good hack and run along

It was Buuuuuuuush fault no?

-Geaux

psychotic uneducated freak says what?

 

[jillian]

He was Democrat until 1988, way way after "party switch" happened.

Try again.

Absolutely!

Throughout his formative years, when he learned to be a violent racist.....he was a Democrat.

So were you a Democrat then too? Just trying to figure out when you learned to be a violent racist.

Definition of racist: a conservative winning an argument with a Liberal.

I believe you have just documented that definition.

Definition of a PoliticalChic: a delusional partisan hate filled Conservative who is incapable of perceiving reality and spams regurgitated political nonsense.

I believe you have just documented that definition

Well.....I do hate ignorance....

See, I belong to The Alliance for an "Idiot-Free" America, and you're on the to-do list.

says the poster child for ignorant cut and paste spew.

 

[Syriusly]

He was Democrat until 1988, way way after "party switch" happened.

Try again.

Absolutely!

Throughout his formative years, when he learned to be a violent racist.....he was a Democrat.

So were you a Democrat then too? Just trying to figure out when you learned to be a violent racist.

Definition of racist: a conservative winning an argument with a Liberal.

I believe you have just documented that definition.

Definition of a PoliticalChic: a delusional partisan hate filled Conservative who is incapable of perceiving reality and spams regurgitated political nonsense.

I believe you have just documented that definition

Well.....I do hate ignorance.....

How very odd- since the definition of Politicalchic includes embracing hate- and ignorance.

 

[Ame®icano]

The only one that matters:

Former KKK Leader David Duke Says 'Of Course' Trump Voters Are His Voters

He was Democrat until 1988, way way after "party switch" happened.

Try again.

You actually think the party shift of the South happened at 12:43 on a Tuesday the 11th of July in 19xx?

Time doesn't work that way. When Thurmond jumped in the fall of 1964, he was doing what had been for 99 years unthinkable in the South. That took time to crack; tradition runs deep -- some were more bold than others. Thurmond had the temerity to do it because his base was so strong --- he had already won his Senate seat as a write-in after the state Democratic Party had dumped him off the ballot, so he knew party affiliation was, in his position, irrelevant. First and so far only person ever elected to the Senate as a write-in.

In other words he was so entrenched that he could do the unthinkable as a protest parting shot against LBJ's CRA that he couldn't stop that summer. LBJ had mused that the CRA would cost his party the Solid South, and Thurmond was taking steps to make that happen.

Hell, Zell Miller and Billy Graham are still Democrats to this day. It's part of a deep tradition and the South is nothing if not traditional.

Conservatism and nazism share the same core belief that their ideology is a panacea which should prevail above all others. In their respective [and diseased] minds, their ideology can do no wrong when practiced in its purist form.

By the way, national socialism (Nazism) and nationalism are not the same same thing. On the other side, national socialism is socialism. l.

LOL- National Socialism was very specifically a Nationalist movement.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

You keep pointing to "nationalist" while I am pointing to "socialist".

One of them is not necessarily bad, guess which one.

Do you ever wonder how someone can say something so stupid and still survive the day?

You do know the where name "Nazi" came from? Let me help you: NSDAP (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei). Name itself speaks for itself.

If breading and reading is not to much of the trouble for you, I suggest you to read Nazi party platform, for start, and if you somehow get thru it, switch to Strasser, and his writings. You could find Hitler's speaches too, and if you listen carefully, he sounds a lot like today's modern progressive left, without "national" part.

Let me guess, someone told you that Nazi's were far right, and you believe in that too.

 

[Ame®icano]

He was Democrat until 1988, way way after "party switch" happened.

Try again.

You actually think the party shift of the South happened at 12:43 on a Tuesday the 11th of July in 19xx?

Time doesn't work that way. When Thurmond jumped in the fall of 1964, he was doing what had been for 99 years unthinkable in the South. That took time to crack; tradition runs deep -- some were more bold than others. Thurmond had the temerity to do it because his base was so strong --- he had already won his Senate seat as a write-in after the state Democratic Party had dumped him off the ballot, so he knew party affiliation was, in his position, irrelevant. First and so far only person ever elected to the Senate as a write-in.

In other words he was so entrenched that he could do the unthinkable as a protest parting shot against LBJ's CRA that he couldn't stop that summer. LBJ had mused that the CRA would cost his party the Solid South, and Thurmond was taking steps to make that happen.

Hell, Zell Miller and Billy Graham are still Democrats to this day. It's part of a deep tradition and the South is nothing if not traditional.

Conservatism and nazism share the same core belief that their ideology is a panacea which should prevail above all others. In their respective [and diseased] minds, their ideology can do no wrong when practiced in its purist form.

By the way, national socialism (Nazism) and nationalism are not the same same thing. On the other side, national socialism is socialism. l.

LOL- National Socialism was very specifically a Nationalist movement.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Matter of fact the actual Socialists --- who the brownshirts were created to intimidate --- were the first Nazi "guests" at Dachau.

Sure, but socialist of different sort. International socialists, and communists. Have you heard of Third International, also called Comintern?

Both, Nazi's and Commies were leftist scam, only Commies were further to the left.

 

[Freewill]

Wow, look at all those white conservatives. Glad they became Republicans.

Name five who did so.

I'll help you with first one, you fill the blanks. Can you?

1. Strom Thurmond
2.
3.
4.
5.

Thanks but it won't even register.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Absolutely!

Throughout his formative years, when he learned to be a violent racist.....he was a Democrat.

So were you a Democrat then too? Just trying to figure out when you learned to be a violent racist.

Definition of racist: a conservative winning an argument with a Liberal.

I believe you have just documented that definition.

Definition of a PoliticalChic: a delusional partisan hate filled Conservative who is incapable of perceiving reality and spams regurgitated political nonsense.

I believe you have just documented that definition

Well.....I do hate ignorance....

See, I belong to The Alliance for an "Idiot-Free" America, and you're on the to-do list.

says the poster child for ignorant cut and paste spew.

" ...ignorant cut and paste..."

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."

Seems it really, really irritates you that I have the education and research ability that you don't....

Excellent.


Oh...and Happy Thanksgiving, you turkey.

 

[Faun]

Wow, look at all those white conservatives. Glad they became Republicans.

Name five who did so.

I'll help you with first one, you fill the blanks. Can you?

1. Strom Thurmond
2.
3.
4.
5.

Sure .... all of the conservative southerners who flipped the south from Democrat...

... to Republican ...

 

[Pogo]

Wow, look at all those white conservatives. Glad they became Republicans.

Name five who did so.

I'll help you with first one, you fill the blanks. Can you?

1. Strom Thurmond
2.
3.
4.
5.

Thanks but it won't even register.

Actually I've already named more than five without seeing this post. And yes, it didn't register.

Nice pun btw --- "register". I get it. Haw haw.

 

[Syriusly]

He was Democrat until 1988, way way after "party switch" happened.

Try again.

You actually think the party shift of the South happened at 12:43 on a Tuesday the 11th of July in 19xx?

Time doesn't work that way. When Thurmond jumped in the fall of 1964, he was doing what had been for 99 years unthinkable in the South. That took time to crack; tradition runs deep -- some were more bold than others. Thurmond had the temerity to do it because his base was so strong --- he had already won his Senate seat as a write-in after the state Democratic Party had dumped him off the ballot, so he knew party affiliation was, in his position, irrelevant. First and so far only person ever elected to the Senate as a write-in.

In other words he was so entrenched that he could do the unthinkable as a protest parting shot against LBJ's CRA that he couldn't stop that summer. LBJ had mused that the CRA would cost his party the Solid South, and Thurmond was taking steps to make that happen.

Hell, Zell Miller and Billy Graham are still Democrats to this day. It's part of a deep tradition and the South is nothing if not traditional.

Conservatism and nazism share the same core belief that their ideology is a panacea which should prevail above all others. In their respective [and diseased] minds, their ideology can do no wrong when practiced in its purist form.

By the way, national socialism (Nazism) and nationalism are not the same same thing. On the other side, national socialism is socialism. l.

LOL- National Socialism was very specifically a Nationalist movement.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

You keep pointing to "nationalist" while I am pointing to "socialist".

One of them is not necessarily bad, guess which one.

Well since the Nazi's were the party of rabid Nationalism.....hmmmm

Hell the Nazi's were very successful Nationalists- stirring up Nationalist sentiment against everyone who wasn't 'Aryan'- but were terrible socialists- since corporations and industrial tycoons got filthy rich- and the Nazi's jailed both socialists and communists....

 

[Syriusly]

He was Democrat until 1988, way way after "party switch" happened.

Try again.

You actually think the party shift of the South happened at 12:43 on a Tuesday the 11th of July in 19xx?

Time doesn't work that way. When Thurmond jumped in the fall of 1964, he was doing what had been for 99 years unthinkable in the South. That took time to crack; tradition runs deep -- some were more bold than others. Thurmond had the temerity to do it because his base was so strong --- he had already won his Senate seat as a write-in after the state Democratic Party had dumped him off the ballot, so he knew party affiliation was, in his position, irrelevant. First and so far only person ever elected to the Senate as a write-in.

In other words he was so entrenched that he could do the unthinkable as a protest parting shot against LBJ's CRA that he couldn't stop that summer. LBJ had mused that the CRA would cost his party the Solid South, and Thurmond was taking steps to make that happen.

Hell, Zell Miller and Billy Graham are still Democrats to this day. It's part of a deep tradition and the South is nothing if not traditional.

Conservatism and nazism share the same core belief that their ideology is a panacea which should prevail above all others. In their respective [and diseased] minds, their ideology can do no wrong when practiced in its purist form.

By the way, national socialism (Nazism) and nationalism are not the same same thing. On the other side, national socialism is socialism. l.

LOL- National Socialism was very specifically a Nationalist movement.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

You keep pointing to "nationalist" while I am pointing to "socialist".

One of them is not necessarily bad, guess which one.

Do you ever wonder how someone can say something so stupid and still survive the day?

You do know the where name "Nazi" came from? Let me help you: NSDAP (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei). Name itself speaks for itself.

If breading and reading is not to much of the trouble for you, I suggest you to read Nazi party platform, for start, and if you somehow get thru it, switch to Strasser, and his writings. You could find Hitler's speaches too, and if you listen carefully, he sounds a lot like today's modern progressive left, without "national" part.

Let me guess, someone told you that Nazi's were far right, and you believe in that too.

The Nazi's were both far right- and far left.

But they were always Nationalists.

Let me guess, someone told you that Nazi's were socialists, and you believe in that too.

 

[Pogo]

Wow, look at all those white conservatives. Glad they became Republicans.

Name five who did so.

I'll help you with first one, you fill the blanks. Can you?

1. Strom Thurmond
2.
3.
4.
5.

Sure .... all of the conservative southerners who flipped the south from Democrat...

... to Republican ...

This first map (1924) is especially interesting on several levels.

The blue (Democrat votes for Davis) dominate the South (and don't appear anywhere else than that greater region). The entire rest of the country save one state is red, representing the vote for Coolidge.

Coolidge is who the Ku Klux Klan endorsed. To the extent they had any effect on the vote, the Klan could not overcome the deep Solid South tradition. The entire South voted against the Klan choice.

Four years later when the Klan endorsed Hoover and pushed a viscious smear campaign against the Democrat, the results were mixed:

​

--- even though the Klan influence was starting to wane by then. The Deep South still voted against the Klan choice in favor of the old Solid South tradition.

Also note how few electoral votes Florida had then, compared to now. California too.

The other interesting note about the 1924 map is the green color of Wisconsin, representing the Progressive "Fighting Bob" LaFollette. Just because Wisconsin is the site of the photo in the OP taken one month after it voted for LaFollette, which tells us for all the bluster of a photo of a Wisconsin Klan march ridiculously misrepresented as "the Democratic convention", they didn't have much of an influence in Wisconsin either. At least not to the extent they did in Indiana and Ohio and Kansas where they got Governors and boatloads of local officials elected, that same year.

 

[Ame®icano]

Wow, look at all those white conservatives. Glad they became Republicans.

Name five who did so.

I'll help you with first one, you fill the blanks. Can you?

1. Strom Thurmond
2.
3.
4.
5.

Sure .... all of the conservative southerners who flipped the south from Democrat...

... to Republican ...

Are we still talking about all those racists Democrats that became Republicans, and parties "switching sides"?

How about you finish the list so we can discuss it...

 

[Ame®icano]

Wow, look at all those white conservatives. Glad they became Republicans.

Name five who did so.

I'll help you with first one, you fill the blanks. Can you?

1. Strom Thurmond
2.
3.
4.
5.

Thanks but it won't even register.

Actually I've already named more than five without seeing this post. And yes, it didn't register.

Nice pun btw --- "register". I get it. Haw haw.

Names.