Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

[Pogo]

He was Democrat until 1988, way way after "party switch" happened.

Try again.

You actually think the party shift of the South happened at 12:43 on a Tuesday the 11th of July in 19xx?

Time doesn't work that way. When Thurmond jumped in the fall of 1964, he was doing what had been for 99 years unthinkable in the South. That took time to crack; tradition runs deep -- some were more bold than others. Thurmond had the temerity to do it because his base was so strong --- he had already won his Senate seat as a write-in after the state Democratic Party had dumped him off the ballot, so he knew party affiliation was, in his position, irrelevant. First and so far only person ever elected to the Senate as a write-in.

In other words he was so entrenched that he could do the unthinkable as a protest parting shot against LBJ's CRA that he couldn't stop that summer. LBJ had mused that the CRA would cost his party the Solid South, and Thurmond was taking steps to make that happen.

Hell, Zell Miller and Billy Graham are still Democrats to this day. It's part of a deep tradition and the South is nothing if not traditional.

Conservatism and nazism share the same core belief that their ideology is a panacea which should prevail above all others. In their respective [and diseased] minds, their ideology can do no wrong when practiced in its purist form.

By the way, national socialism (Nazism) and nationalism are not the same same thing. On the other side, national socialism is socialism. l.

LOL- National Socialism was very specifically a Nationalist movement.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

The National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), more commonly known as the Nazi Party, was a political party in Germany between 1920 and 1945. - Origins in the German Worker's Party.

Reference: jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/holocaust/nsdap.html

Because a swell stand-up guy like Adolf Hitler, who created the brownshirts to beat up Socialists and then called them the "gymnastic and sports division" (and then sent them off to Dachau) would never stoop to misrepresentation via lying propaganda, right?

Guess how many grapes and how many nuts are in this box. Win a prize.

​

"B-but... but... it's in the name!"

Are you actually trying to tell us that Adolf Hitler is more honest than Post Cereals?

Wanna try a bonus question?

---- How many people do you think are in the band "10,000 Maniacs"? Just pick a number.

Idiot.

How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job

#9) Sociopaths never apologize. They are never wrong. They never feel guilt. They can never apologize. Even if shown proof that they were wrong, they will refuse to apologize and instead go on the attack.

True, but this thread isn't about Donald Rump.

 

[Pogo]

Wonder why?

-Geaux
--------

The picture was taken during the 1924 Democratic Convention.

It was also known as “Klanbake.”

In Madison Square Garden, New York City, from June 24 to July 9, a dispute during came up revolving around an attempt by non-Klan delegates, led by Forney Johnston of Alabama, to condemn the organization for its violence in the Democratic Party’s platform.



Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

who says liberals aren't liking it, psychotroll?
everyone knows that the kkk used to be part of the dem party in the south. that's part of our history.

it's also part of our history that since the civil rights act passed, they all belong to you.

that's why the orange sociopath defended them.

but I still don't understand why you losers keep talking about 50 years ago when you own the kkk and the white supremacists today.

now be a good hack and run along

Actually although this KKK was founded in the South it was founded by a nonpolitical opportunist who was trying to cash in on the rampant racism and xenophobia of the time, and this photo Sleaux posted is not of a political convention at all, but a funeral march in Wisconsin. Has nothing to do with either the South or with Democrats, whose convention had already taken place six months earlier and a thousand miles away, after which the Klan endorsed the Republican Coolidge, the only major candidate who didn't denounce them.

That's why Sleaux already ran along. He stepped in it big time.

 

[jillian]

Wonder why?

-Geaux
--------

The picture was taken during the 1924 Democratic Convention.

It was also known as “Klanbake.”

In Madison Square Garden, New York City, from June 24 to July 9, a dispute during came up revolving around an attempt by non-Klan delegates, led by Forney Johnston of Alabama, to condemn the organization for its violence in the Democratic Party’s platform.



Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

who says liberals aren't liking it, psychotroll?
everyone knows that the kkk used to be part of the dem party in the south. that's part of our history.

it's also part of our history that since the civil rights act passed, they all belong to you.

that's why the orange sociopath defended them.

but I still don't understand why you losers keep talking about 50 years ago when you own the kkk and the white supremacists today.

now be a good hack and run along

Actually although this KKK was founded in the South it was founded by a nonpolitical opportunist who was trying to cash in on the rampant racism and xenophobia of the time, and this photo Sleaux posted is not of a political convention at all, but a funeral march in Wisconsin. Has nothing to do with either the South or with Democrats, whose convention had already taken place six months earlier and a thousand miles away, after which the Klan endorsed the Republican Coolidge, the only major candidate who didn't denounce them.

That's why Sleaux already ran along. He stepped in it big time.

that may well be, though there was a democratic convention where the kkk interfered and wanted their choice of candidate.

the result was that the democratic party split and a republican was elected.

but again, this was all more than 60 years ago and the kkk'ers are all GOP now.

 

[Syriusly]

He was Democrat until 1988, way way after "party switch" happened.

Try again.

You actually think the party shift of the South happened at 12:43 on a Tuesday the 11th of July in 19xx?

Time doesn't work that way. When Thurmond jumped in the fall of 1964, he was doing what had been for 99 years unthinkable in the South. That took time to crack; tradition runs deep -- some were more bold than others. Thurmond had the temerity to do it because his base was so strong --- he had already won his Senate seat as a write-in after the state Democratic Party had dumped him off the ballot, so he knew party affiliation was, in his position, irrelevant. First and so far only person ever elected to the Senate as a write-in.

In other words he was so entrenched that he could do the unthinkable as a protest parting shot against LBJ's CRA that he couldn't stop that summer. LBJ had mused that the CRA would cost his party the Solid South, and Thurmond was taking steps to make that happen.

Hell, Zell Miller and Billy Graham are still Democrats to this day. It's part of a deep tradition and the South is nothing if not traditional.

Conservatism and nazism share the same core belief that their ideology is a panacea which should prevail above all others. In their respective [and diseased] minds, their ideology can do no wrong when practiced in its purist form.

By the way, national socialism (Nazism) and nationalism are not the same same thing. On the other side, national socialism is socialism. l.

LOL- National Socialism was very specifically a Nationalist movement.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

The National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), more commonly known as the Nazi Party, was a political party in Germany between 1920 and 1945. - Origins in the German Worker's Party.

Reference: jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/holocaust/nsdap.html..

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Wow, look at all those white conservatives. Glad they became Republicans.

Name five who did so.

I'll help you with first one, you fill the blanks. Can you?

1. Strom Thurmond
2.
3.
4.
5.

The only one that matters:

Former KKK Leader David Duke Says 'Of Course' Trump Voters Are His Voters

He was Democrat until 1988, way way after "party switch" happened.

Try again.

Absolutely!

Throughout his formative years, when he learned to be a violent racist.....he was a Democrat.

So were you a Democrat then too? Just trying to figure out when you learned to be a violent racist.

Definition of racist: a conservative winning an argument with a Liberal.

I believe you have just documented that definition.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You actually think the party shift of the South happened at 12:43 on a Tuesday the 11th of July in 19xx?

Time doesn't work that way. When Thurmond jumped in the fall of 1964, he was doing what had been for 99 years unthinkable in the South. That took time to crack; tradition runs deep -- some were more bold than others. Thurmond had the temerity to do it because his base was so strong --- he had already won his Senate seat as a write-in after the state Democratic Party had dumped him off the ballot, so he knew party affiliation was, in his position, irrelevant. First and so far only person ever elected to the Senate as a write-in.

In other words he was so entrenched that he could do the unthinkable as a protest parting shot against LBJ's CRA that he couldn't stop that summer. LBJ had mused that the CRA would cost his party the Solid South, and Thurmond was taking steps to make that happen.

Hell, Zell Miller and Billy Graham are still Democrats to this day. It's part of a deep tradition and the South is nothing if not traditional.

Conservatism and nazism share the same core belief that their ideology is a panacea which should prevail above all others. In their respective [and diseased] minds, their ideology can do no wrong when practiced in its purist form.

By the way, national socialism (Nazism) and nationalism are not the same same thing. On the other side, national socialism is socialism. l.

LOL- National Socialism was very specifically a Nationalist movement.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

The National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), more commonly known as the Nazi Party, was a political party in Germany between 1920 and 1945. - Origins in the German Worker's Party.

Reference: jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/holocaust/nsdap.html..

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Of course the Nazis were socialists.

And their policies couldn't be more Liberal.

"The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the régime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.”[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible “for travellers’ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; ‘support’ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.”

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans “the highest possible standard of living.” National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia


Communists, Liberals, Socialists, Fascists, Nazis.....peas in a pod.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You actually think the party shift of the South happened at 12:43 on a Tuesday the 11th of July in 19xx?

Time doesn't work that way. When Thurmond jumped in the fall of 1964, he was doing what had been for 99 years unthinkable in the South. That took time to crack; tradition runs deep -- some were more bold than others. Thurmond had the temerity to do it because his base was so strong --- he had already won his Senate seat as a write-in after the state Democratic Party had dumped him off the ballot, so he knew party affiliation was, in his position, irrelevant. First and so far only person ever elected to the Senate as a write-in.

In other words he was so entrenched that he could do the unthinkable as a protest parting shot against LBJ's CRA that he couldn't stop that summer. LBJ had mused that the CRA would cost his party the Solid South, and Thurmond was taking steps to make that happen.

Hell, Zell Miller and Billy Graham are still Democrats to this day. It's part of a deep tradition and the South is nothing if not traditional.

Conservatism and nazism share the same core belief that their ideology is a panacea which should prevail above all others. In their respective [and diseased] minds, their ideology can do no wrong when practiced in its purist form.

By the way, national socialism (Nazism) and nationalism are not the same same thing. On the other side, national socialism is socialism. l.

LOL- National Socialism was very specifically a Nationalist movement.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

The National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), more commonly known as the Nazi Party, was a political party in Germany between 1920 and 1945. - Origins in the German Worker's Party.

Reference: jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/holocaust/nsdap.html..

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

"The Nazi Party embraced capitalism."

Another lie you were taught in government school.


"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian


1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.


2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?


3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.


4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners."


Don't be stupid your whole life.......take a day off.

 

[Pogo]

Wonder why?

-Geaux
--------

The picture was taken during the 1924 Democratic Convention.

It was also known as “Klanbake.”

In Madison Square Garden, New York City, from June 24 to July 9, a dispute during came up revolving around an attempt by non-Klan delegates, led by Forney Johnston of Alabama, to condemn the organization for its violence in the Democratic Party’s platform.



Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

who says liberals aren't liking it, psychotroll?
everyone knows that the kkk used to be part of the dem party in the south. that's part of our history.

it's also part of our history that since the civil rights act passed, they all belong to you.

that's why the orange sociopath defended them.

but I still don't understand why you losers keep talking about 50 years ago when you own the kkk and the white supremacists today.

now be a good hack and run along

Actually although this KKK was founded in the South it was founded by a nonpolitical opportunist who was trying to cash in on the rampant racism and xenophobia of the time, and this photo Sleaux posted is not of a political convention at all, but a funeral march in Wisconsin. Has nothing to do with either the South or with Democrats, whose convention had already taken place six months earlier and a thousand miles away, after which the Klan endorsed the Republican Coolidge, the only major candidate who didn't denounce them.

That's why Sleaux already ran along. He stepped in it big time.

that may well be, though there was a democratic convention where the kkk interfered and wanted their choice of candidate.

the result was that the democratic party split and a republican was elected.

but again, this was all more than 60 years ago and the kkk'ers are all GOP now.

In 1924 the Klan was at the height of its national power and its infilltrators got the Democratic convention (in New York) deadlocked so many times it became the longest convention in history (and still is), over the issue of which candidate, a Klan denouncer or a Klan apologist, would get the nod. After over a hundred ballots they finally settled on an innocuous dark horse who was inoffensive to both sides --- who then promptly denounced the Klan anyway.

Meanwhile Klan gadflies camped across the Hudson River in New Jersey, and that's what Sleaux thought he was posting in a photo of some wet trolley tracks in Wisconsin, because he didn't bother to inspect his source. He actually thought a political party held a convention on some wet trolley tracks.

He even swallowed the bit about "newly discovered" even though the photo has been sitting in the Wisconsin Historical Society for 90+ years.

In the same year the Klan was pushing, often successfully, to get Governors, Senators and lower offices elected in Indiana, Maine, Colorado, Kansas, California and other places, all as Republicans. But they also got a couple of Dems elected at the same time. Whatever would work in that time and that place.

 

[Pogo]

Conservatism and nazism share the same core belief that their ideology is a panacea which should prevail above all others. In their respective [and diseased] minds, their ideology can do no wrong when practiced in its purist form.

By the way, national socialism (Nazism) and nationalism are not the same same thing. On the other side, national socialism is socialism. l.

LOL- National Socialism was very specifically a Nationalist movement.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

The National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), more commonly known as the Nazi Party, was a political party in Germany between 1920 and 1945. - Origins in the German Worker's Party.

Reference: jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/holocaust/nsdap.html..

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Of course the Nazis were socialists.

And their policies couldn't be more Liberal.

"The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the régime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.”[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible “for travellers’ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; ‘support’ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.”

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans “the highest possible standard of living.” National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia


Communists, Liberals, Socialists, Fascists, Nazis.....peas in a pod.

Spandexia continues to wallow in abject ignorance of what the term "Liberal" means. Let alone all the others of which she's equally clueless.

Wanna see some Liberals? Here's a hint:

​

OK, they do dress kinda weird. Granted.

 

[Geaux4it]

Wonder why?

-Geaux
--------

The picture was taken during the 1924 Democratic Convention.

It was also known as “Klanbake.”

In Madison Square Garden, New York City, from June 24 to July 9, a dispute during came up revolving around an attempt by non-Klan delegates, led by Forney Johnston of Alabama, to condemn the organization for its violence in the Democratic Party’s platform.



Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

who says liberals aren't liking it, psychotroll?
everyone knows that the kkk used to be part of the dem party in the south. that's part of our history.

it's also part of our history that since the civil rights act passed, they all belong to you.

that's why the orange sociopath defended them.

but I still don't understand why you losers keep talking about 50 years ago when you own the kkk and the white supremacists today.

now be a good hack and run along

It was Buuuuuuuush fault no?

-Geaux

 

[Synthaholic]

Wonder why?

-Geaux
--------

The picture was taken during the 1924 Democratic Convention.

It was also known as “Klanbake.”

In Madison Square Garden, New York City, from June 24 to July 9, a dispute during came up revolving around an attempt by non-Klan delegates, led by Forney Johnston of Alabama, to condemn the organization for its violence in the Democratic Party’s platform.



Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

So did the racists all move out of the South? Did the Klan cease to be?

What Party do they all belong to today?

 

[Geaux4it]

Wonder why?

-Geaux
--------

The picture was taken during the 1924 Democratic Convention.

It was also known as “Klanbake.”

In Madison Square Garden, New York City, from June 24 to July 9, a dispute during came up revolving around an attempt by non-Klan delegates, led by Forney Johnston of Alabama, to condemn the organization for its violence in the Democratic Party’s platform.



Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

So did the racists all move out of the South? Did the Klan cease to be?

What Party do they all belong to today?

I have no idea as their numbers today have zero influence regardless

-Geaux

 

[Synthaholic]

Geaux4it thinks he's stumbled onto some huge gotcha!

When Democrats started becoming the Party of the working class and the immigrant and the Blacks and the poor Whites, the racists looked around and said "The Right-Wing are speaking our language", and every Republican played on that racism, from Nixon's Southern Strategy to Reagan announcing his candidacy in Philadelphia, Mississippi.

Not all Republicans are racist but nearly all racists are Republicans.

 

[PoliticalChic]

By the way, national socialism (Nazism) and nationalism are not the same same thing. On the other side, national socialism is socialism. l.

LOL- National Socialism was very specifically a Nationalist movement.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

The National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), more commonly known as the Nazi Party, was a political party in Germany between 1920 and 1945. - Origins in the German Worker's Party.

Reference: jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/holocaust/nsdap.html..

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Of course the Nazis were socialists.

And their policies couldn't be more Liberal.

"The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the régime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.”[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible “for travellers’ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; ‘support’ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.”

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans “the highest possible standard of living.” National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia


Communists, Liberals, Socialists, Fascists, Nazis.....peas in a pod.

Spandexia continues to wallow in abject ignorance of what the term "Liberal" means. Let alone all the others of which she's equally clueless.

Wanna see some Liberals? Here's a hint:

​

OK, they do dress kinda weird. Granted.

"Liberal" in today's parlance, means just what 'communism' means.

That's easily documented when one compares the aims and desires of the current Democrat/Liberal establishment with the aims and desires of the CPUSA (Communist Party USA)

Here's today's lesson, you dolt:

How about you take a look at the aims of the Communist Party, USA, and the aims of the modern Democrat Party.


Watch, and note the consubstantial basis of both the aims of the Communist Party and the Democrat Party:

......it is ...extraordinary.....the correspondence between the aims of the communist party and the aims of the Democrats.....

1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.

3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

4. . Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.


5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.


11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce



Now....wouldn't an honest appraisal agree that all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive leaders?

I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals



You might take a look at this one, too.
10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.



"Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street - Shadowproof

And this:

"Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too.Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917(Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately."
Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.


They didn't call it ObamaCare....




....we are now free of that inordinate fear of communism.... Jimmy Carter Jimmy Carter: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - Address at Commencement Exercises at the University


President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” He urged those at a town hall eventin Buenos Aires, Argentina on Wednesday to “just choose from what works.”
Obama Downplays Difference Between Capitalism, Communism [VIDEO]





At your advanced age, of course, you will never admit that you have been manipulated to support Bolshevism....

.....but you have.

 

[Pogo]

LOL- National Socialism was very specifically a Nationalist movement.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

On the other hand- the Nazi's were not socialists.

The National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), more commonly known as the Nazi Party, was a political party in Germany between 1920 and 1945. - Origins in the German Worker's Party.

Reference: jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/holocaust/nsdap.html..

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Of course the Nazis were socialists.

And their policies couldn't be more Liberal.

"The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the régime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.”[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible “for travellers’ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; ‘support’ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.”

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans “the highest possible standard of living.” National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia


Communists, Liberals, Socialists, Fascists, Nazis.....peas in a pod.

Spandexia continues to wallow in abject ignorance of what the term "Liberal" means. Let alone all the others of which she's equally clueless.

Wanna see some Liberals? Here's a hint:

​

OK, they do dress kinda weird. Granted.

"Liberal" in today's parlance, means just what 'communism' means.

That's easily documented when one compares the aims and desires of the current Democrat/Liberal establishment with the aims and desires of the CPUSA (Communist Party USA)

Taken to school and metaphorically whipped with a cane, she wrests away the cane and uses it to dig herself even deeper.



Now she can't distinguish between a political philosophy and a political party.

/continuously offtopic

 

[Pogo]

Wonder why?

-Geaux
--------

The picture was taken during the 1924 Democratic Convention.

It was also known as “Klanbake.”

In Madison Square Garden, New York City, from June 24 to July 9, a dispute during came up revolving around an attempt by non-Klan delegates, led by Forney Johnston of Alabama, to condemn the organization for its violence in the Democratic Party’s platform.



Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

So did the racists all move out of the South? Did the Klan cease to be?

What Party do they all belong to today?

I have no idea as their numbers today have zero influence regardless

-Geaux

Dey sure wuz in control of the trolley tracks in Madison Wisconsin on that Decemer day in 1924 though huh?

You miss those daze?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Of course the Nazis were socialists.

And their policies couldn't be more Liberal.

"The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the régime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.”[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible “for travellers’ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; ‘support’ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.”

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans “the highest possible standard of living.” National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia


Communists, Liberals, Socialists, Fascists, Nazis.....peas in a pod.

Spandexia continues to wallow in abject ignorance of what the term "Liberal" means. Let alone all the others of which she's equally clueless.

Wanna see some Liberals? Here's a hint:

​

OK, they do dress kinda weird. Granted.

"Liberal" in today's parlance, means just what 'communism' means.

That's easily documented when one compares the aims and desires of the current Democrat/Liberal establishment with the aims and desires of the CPUSA (Communist Party USA)

Taken to school and metaphorically whipped with a cane, she wrests away the cane and uses it to dig herself even deeper.



Now she can't distinguish between a political philosophy and a political party.

/continuously offtopic

Good to see you ran from the post, as you were unable to deny any of it.

As I predicted, your tenure in ignorance and indoctrination, prevents acceptance of the truth.

 

[Pogo]

Oh- well I guess that means North Korea is a democracy....

Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

No- the Nazi's were not socialists.

Who are 'socialists'? Those who believe in Socialism
Socialism:
any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

The Nazi Party embraced capitalism. Volkswagon and BMW thrived under Nazism.

Socialists however- were persecuted.

Of course the Nazis were socialists.

And their policies couldn't be more Liberal.

"The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the régime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.”[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible “for travellers’ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; ‘support’ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.”

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans “the highest possible standard of living.” National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia


Communists, Liberals, Socialists, Fascists, Nazis.....peas in a pod.

Spandexia continues to wallow in abject ignorance of what the term "Liberal" means. Let alone all the others of which she's equally clueless.

Wanna see some Liberals? Here's a hint:

​

OK, they do dress kinda weird. Granted.

"Liberal" in today's parlance, means just what 'communism' means.

That's easily documented when one compares the aims and desires of the current Democrat/Liberal establishment with the aims and desires of the CPUSA (Communist Party USA)

Taken to school and metaphorically whipped with a cane, she wrests away the cane and uses it to dig herself even deeper.



Now she can't distinguish between a political philosophy and a political party.

/continuously offtopic

Good to see you ran from the post, as you were unable to deny any of it.

As I predicted, your tenure in ignorance and indoctrination, prevents acceptance of the truth.

Oh I gave it the fifteen seconds of mockery it deserved. Wasn't worth any more than that.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Of course the Nazis were socialists.

And their policies couldn't be more Liberal.

"The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the régime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.”[4]

The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible “for travellers’ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; ‘support’ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.”

These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans “the highest possible standard of living.” National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia


Communists, Liberals, Socialists, Fascists, Nazis.....peas in a pod.

Spandexia continues to wallow in abject ignorance of what the term "Liberal" means. Let alone all the others of which she's equally clueless.

Wanna see some Liberals? Here's a hint:

​

OK, they do dress kinda weird. Granted.

"Liberal" in today's parlance, means just what 'communism' means.

That's easily documented when one compares the aims and desires of the current Democrat/Liberal establishment with the aims and desires of the CPUSA (Communist Party USA)

Taken to school and metaphorically whipped with a cane, she wrests away the cane and uses it to dig herself even deeper.



Now she can't distinguish between a political philosophy and a political party.

/continuously offtopic

Good to see you ran from the post, as you were unable to deny any of it.

As I predicted, your tenure in ignorance and indoctrination, prevents acceptance of the truth.

Oh I gave it the fifteen seconds of mockery it deserved. Wasn't worth any more than that.

I provided a documented, linked sourced post proving the point that there is hardly a difference between your political positions and those of Earl Browder.

"Earl Russell Browder (May 20, 1891 – June 27, 1973) was an American political activist and leader of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). Browder is best remembered as the General Secretary of the CPUSA during the 1930s and first half of the 1940s."
Earl Browder - Wikipedia

So far, you've pretended that the KKK wasn't created by the Democrats, and the party is racist to this day, and that Liberals don't yearn for the same conclusions for society as the communists did...

I leave it to readers of the several post to make their own conclusions about your inability to tell the truth.

 

[Pogo]

Spandexia continues to wallow in abject ignorance of what the term "Liberal" means. Let alone all the others of which she's equally clueless.

Wanna see some Liberals? Here's a hint:

​

OK, they do dress kinda weird. Granted.

"Liberal" in today's parlance, means just what 'communism' means.

That's easily documented when one compares the aims and desires of the current Democrat/Liberal establishment with the aims and desires of the CPUSA (Communist Party USA)

Taken to school and metaphorically whipped with a cane, she wrests away the cane and uses it to dig herself even deeper.



Now she can't distinguish between a political philosophy and a political party.

/continuously offtopic

Good to see you ran from the post, as you were unable to deny any of it.

As I predicted, your tenure in ignorance and indoctrination, prevents acceptance of the truth.

Oh I gave it the fifteen seconds of mockery it deserved. Wasn't worth any more than that.

I provided a documented, linked sourced post proving the point that there is hardly a difference between your political positions and those of Earl Browder.

"Earl Russell Browder (May 20, 1891 – June 27, 1973) was an American political activist and leader of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). Browder is best remembered as the General Secretary of the CPUSA during the 1930s and first half of the 1940s."
Earl Browder - Wikipedia

So far, you've pretended that the KKK wasn't created by the Democrats, and the party is racist to this day, and that Liberals don't yearn for the same conclusions for society as the communists did...

I leave it to readers of the several post to make their own conclusions about your inability to tell the truth.

What you 'provided' was the latest dropping in an endless diarrhea of off-topic TL;DRs that nobody pisses away their time reading because we all know there's no there there. Here, for example, you persisted in trying to derail a topic set in the year 1924 to "Bill Clinton", an entity who didn't even exist in 1924. Because you can't handle the topic. It's like ----- what is the word ------ Kryptonite.

I haven't "pretended" the KKK wasn't created by the Democrats ---- I've stated it outright. In dripping detail complete with exact names, dates and places, as well as historical context. And I've then invited any contradiction to those facts, and it's never happened. And such contradiction has never happened simply because it does not exist. The simple and irrefutable fact remains that there is no record of any political affiliation for any founder of the Klan, in either of its iterations. Period.

Now I'm sure it's all touchy-feely to live in a fantasy land where you just wish for whatever you'd like to have happened in the past but the world of Reality simply doesn't work that way.