Liberals: Be Not Offended!

Especially the part about freedom FROM religion.

you are so fucking wrong and stupid at the same time, you :asshole:S tell us we do not know how to read, yet you lie about the first Amdt., here it is, read it

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

there is no fucking "FROM" in there anywhere, you libertards are so fucking stupid i am surprised you even know how to lift a fork and spoon :up:
 
Another dumb Leftist bumper-sticker.

The Founders endorsed a nation based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

Me, too.


How come you don't?
And slavery.

Seems like you don't even know where 'right' and 'left' came from. The founders you describe would have been characterised as 'leftists'.
 
Actually, no

Actually, yes

This is from the guy who invented it

"Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

Now what does that remind you of?

Hint, Walker, Koch brothers
None of the above stand for the individual and freedom.

Freedumb? The right to indoctrinate everyone with your compassionate conservative bull$hit wether they want to listen or not?

:banana:
 
I remember my Granddad telling the story about this woman who wanted to be "treated equally" and how they laughed so much they cried. Saying women are temperamental and really wanted to be home and get piped all day. Can you believe that chick had the GALL to say she was offended and didnt want to get dicked all day? "WHAT ARE YOU A LESBIAN?" his co-worker said

When you finish the dishes what else are you gonna do?

Thanksgivings in the Caption home must be such charming affairs

Yes we all laugh at women who were offended like Get over it! HAR HAR HAR!

As you pick your teeth and scrape the mud off your feet?
 
Liberals actually set policies to restrict religious and conservative dissidents.

Yup!

Those liberals were the Founding Fathers and that policy is called the 1st Amendment.

You should ask one of your teachers to explain it to you one day.

Especially the part about freedom FROM religion.

There is no "freedom FROM religion", it's "freedom OF religion". You look really, really stupid right now, more so than you usually do
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz
Actually, no

Actually, yes

This is from the guy who invented it

"Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

Now what does that remind you of?

Hint, Walker, Koch brothers
None of the above stand for the individual and freedom.

Freedumb? The right to indoctrinate everyone with your compassionate conservative bull$hit wether they want to listen or not?

:banana:

Um...you don't know what a message board is, Holmes...
 
Liberals actually set policies to restrict religious and conservative dissidents.

Yup!

Those liberals were the Founding Fathers and that policy is called the 1st Amendment.

You should ask one of your teachers to explain it to you one day.

Especially the part about freedom FROM religion.

There is no "freedom FROM religion", it's "freedom OF religion". You look really, really stupid right now, more so than you usually do

Perfectly stated, Sassy
 
Liberals actually set policies to restrict religious and conservative dissidents.

Yup!

Those liberals were the Founding Fathers and that policy is called the 1st Amendment.

You should ask one of your teachers to explain it to you one day.

Especially the part about freedom FROM religion.

There is no "freedom FROM religion", it's "freedom OF religion". You look really, really stupid right now, more so than you usually do

Yes there is. The freedom from religion is clearly contained in the prohibition of the US having a state religion.
 
Liberals actually set policies to restrict religious and conservative dissidents.

Yup!

Those liberals were the Founding Fathers and that policy is called the 1st Amendment.

You should ask one of your teachers to explain it to you one day.

Especially the part about freedom FROM religion.

There is no "freedom FROM religion", it's "freedom OF religion". You look really, really stupid right now, more so than you usually do

Yes there is. The freedom from religion is clearly contained in the prohibition of the US having a state religion.

You're grasping, sit down and shut up
 
I remember my Granddad telling the story about this woman who wanted to be "treated equally" and how they laughed so much they cried. Saying women are temperamental and really wanted to be home and get piped all day. Can you believe that chick had the GALL to say she was offended and didnt want to get dicked all day? "WHAT ARE YOU A LESBIAN?" his co-worker said

When you finish the dishes what else are you gonna do?

Thanksgivings in the Caption home must be such charming affairs

Yes we all laugh at women who were offended like Get over it! HAR HAR HAR!

As you pick your teeth and scrape the mud off your feet?

You were there?
 
Another dumb Leftist bumper-sticker.

The Founders endorsed a nation based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

Me, too.


How come you don't?
And slavery.

Seems like you don't even know where 'right' and 'left' came from. The founders you describe would have been characterised as 'leftists'.


" individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government."


You can run but you can't hide.
 
1. Yet, the dominant political party/worldview promises to do just that. 'Your widdle feeling hurt? Or might be hurt? Well....we'll put in place rules, regulations, speech codes, 'trigger warnings,' ....and, don't forget the mantra that the Democrats provided during the Clarence Thomas nomination, that the accusation of criminal wrongdoing , namely the unproved sexual harassment claims of one Anita Hill....even though Ms. Hill couldn't prove her accusation, that didn't matter.

.

Oh dear, were Clarence Thomas's feelings hurt?



So....there were no restrictive policies set in motion by Clarence Thomas?

You simply provided a bogus post in your failed attempt to provide cover for Leftist fascists?

You're the one who brought up Clarence Thomas. He was accused of sexual misconduct; the charges didn't stick.

He's on the Court. What are you crying about? Were your feelings hurt that he had to go through the same process all nominated judges go through?
 
I remember my Granddad telling the story about this woman who wanted to be "treated equally" and how they laughed so much they cried. Saying women are temperamental and really wanted to be home and get piped all day. Can you believe that chick had the GALL to say she was offended and didnt want to get dicked all day? "WHAT ARE YOU A LESBIAN?" his co-worker said

When you finish the dishes what else are you gonna do?

Thanksgivings in the Caption home must be such charming affairs


Bet he doesn't know that it was Republicans that got women the right to vote, and Democrats who filibustered against it.

CONSERVATIVE Democrats.
 
Actually, no

Actually, yes

This is from the guy who invented it

"Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

Now what does that remind you of?

Hint, Walker, Koch brothers
None of the above stand for the individual and freedom.

Freedumb? The right to indoctrinate everyone with your compassionate conservative bull$hit wether they want to listen or not?

:banana:



Quiz time:

Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life



And, of course, they all are do.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?

Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.
 
1. Yet, the dominant political party/worldview promises to do just that. 'Your widdle feeling hurt? Or might be hurt? Well....we'll put in place rules, regulations, speech codes, 'trigger warnings,' ....and, don't forget the mantra that the Democrats provided during the Clarence Thomas nomination, that the accusation of criminal wrongdoing , namely the unproved sexual harassment claims of one Anita Hill....even though Ms. Hill couldn't prove her accusation, that didn't matter.

.

Oh dear, were Clarence Thomas's feelings hurt?



So....there were no restrictive policies set in motion by Clarence Thomas?

You simply provided a bogus post in your failed attempt to provide cover for Leftist fascists?

All my post did was ask if Clarence Thomas's feelings were hurt.

Given his crying jag over being 'lynched', I say, yes, his feelings were hurt.

But to use those two words you cited in the OP.

So what?
 

Forum List

Back
Top