Liberals....Come To The Marketplace

[PoliticalChic]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

".... it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues."

Of course, you're an imbecile.


Watch me prove how truly stupid the 'flip' myth is:

What the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as you do, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for your news.....

.....what are the chances would be that you woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican......you know....'flipping.'




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

You have it completely wrong. The voters never changed their values, the parties did. Is the party of Lincoln the same party as that of Trump? I see no similarities.

"I see no similarities."

The list of things you don't see is endless.
That's why I described you as a dunce.


The parties never changed: the Republicans were created to fight the slavery party, the Democrats.

Even a dunce should see the consistency, as the personification of the Democrat Party....Bill Clinton....has been a racist his entire life.

Challenge me on that, dunce.

 

[eddiew37]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

".... it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues."

Of course, you're an imbecile.


Watch me prove how truly stupid the 'flip' myth is:

What the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as you do, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for your news.....

.....what are the chances would be that you woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican......you know....'flipping.'




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

PC I was a republican all my life even voted for GWB in 2000 That was the last time I'll ever vote repub again

"PC I was a republican all my life...."

Changing the subject?

I win again?????????

You mentioned flipping ??? I flipped

 

[jc456]

1. There is the axiom 'In the marketplace of ideas, the Right eats the Left's lunch.'


Coulter put it this way:
"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"




2. If, as many of us on the Right do, you applaud logic and education as the basis of your worldview, then you should be able to support said views.
You can't: you support them based on repetition and the fear of retribution if you question them.

I can pose several questions that show the weaknesses of the Left's doctrines, and policies, and for which Leftist drones will have no way to dispute same.
But...unable to dispute the Right's arguments, the Left has a very effective method of side-stepping the issues.......they lie.

In order to hide the flaws in the Left's dogma, a number of fallacies are published and advanced. Several of the most blatant lies are as follows:

a. It was the group known today as Liberals founded the country and produced the Constitution

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation. Oh...and the Democrats gave women the right to vote.

c. While communists are Leftist, like Liberals, the Nazis are Rightwing and far worse than communists.

d. America is such a racist and xenophopic nation that special classes of individuals must be created protected by government with special rights.

e. There is a 'Far Right' in this country that that works against traditional American values.
Oh....and the corollary to that, that there are Rightwing wealthy that are buying our government....and there there is some eternal group known as 'the rich.'



None of the above is based on truth, but control of the schools and the media by the Left has allowed many to be convinced that these are the facts.
They aren't.




The founding documents of the nation, the Declaration of Independence, and the United States Constitution, memorialize a nation built on specific principles, such as individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

The Left opposes all three of these founding principles.

By 'the Left,' I mean all six of these:
Communism, Nazism, Fascism, Modern Liberalism, Progressivism, and Socialism.


Specifics examples to follow......

At it's core, leftism advances the idea that society should be ruled by a small elite with unlimited power. Of course, the average leftist will dispute this, but not logically.

Anyone who has bothered to study history knows power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. History tells us this kind of 'government' arrangement leads to massive death, destruction, and terrible suffering. Again leftists not knowing anything of history, will dispute this and again not logically.

and the people are smart enough to elect a person like Trump when they realize the nasties that exist in DC. I love it. The leftist responses are total confirmation of the OP.

 

[eddiew37]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

".... it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues."

Of course, you're an imbecile.


Watch me prove how truly stupid the 'flip' myth is:

What the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as you do, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for your news.....

.....what are the chances would be that you woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican......you know....'flipping.'




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

PC I was a republican all my life even voted for GWB in 2000 That was the last time I'll ever vote repub again

Now...let's be clear: 'racism,' if it's any individual's opinion of another individual, or even of another race......
...is that person's right.

We don't criminalize thoughts.


Now...let's have your examples of:
a. laws that single out a race in a negative way....you seem copacetic if laws single out a particular race in a positive way (affirmative action).

b. find 'racism' that actually hurts more than feelings.



And....I believe I just proved that you can't.



QED....there is neither institutional nor widespread racism.....no more against blacks than against any other group.

Admit it.

How about the law in Wisconsin that says you need a drivers license or passport to vote ? Think that effects lower income people of color ?? ...in a state repubs won by only 23000 votes??

 

[PoliticalChic]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

".... it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues."

Of course, you're an imbecile.


Watch me prove how truly stupid the 'flip' myth is:

What the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as you do, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for your news.....

.....what are the chances would be that you woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican......you know....'flipping.'




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

PC I was a republican all my life even voted for GWB in 2000 That was the last time I'll ever vote repub again

"PC I was a republican all my life...."

Changing the subject?

I win again?????????

You mentioned flipping ??? I flipped

Sadly,....you landed on your head.

Let's review:
The fact that no Democrat/Liberal has a cogent answer to these queries about the policies and doctrines of the party to which they cleave reveals the lack of thinking by Leftist Janissaries.


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not of these?


b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.
What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????


c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?





d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....
...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

 

[jc456]

1. There is the axiom 'In the marketplace of ideas, the Right eats the Left's lunch.'


Coulter put it this way:
"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"




2. If, as many of us on the Right do, you applaud logic and education as the basis of your worldview, then you should be able to support said views.
You can't: you support them based on repetition and the fear of retribution if you question them.

I can pose several questions that show the weaknesses of the Left's doctrines, and policies, and for which Leftist drones will have no way to dispute same.
But...unable to dispute the Right's arguments, the Left has a very effective method of side-stepping the issues.......they lie.

In order to hide the flaws in the Left's dogma, a number of fallacies are published and advanced. Several of the most blatant lies are as follows:

a. It was the group known today as Liberals founded the country and produced the Constitution

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation. Oh...and the Democrats gave women the right to vote.

c. While communists are Leftist, like Liberals, the Nazis are Rightwing and far worse than communists.

d. America is such a racist and xenophopic nation that special classes of individuals must be created protected by government with special rights.

e. There is a 'Far Right' in this country that that works against traditional American values.
Oh....and the corollary to that, that there are Rightwing wealthy that are buying our government....and there there is some eternal group known as 'the rich.'



None of the above is based on truth, but control of the schools and the media by the Left has allowed many to be convinced that these are the facts.
They aren't.




The founding documents of the nation, the Declaration of Independence, and the United States Constitution, memorialize a nation built on specific principles, such as individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

The Left opposes all three of these founding principles.

By 'the Left,' I mean all six of these:
Communism, Nazism, Fascism, Modern Liberalism, Progressivism, and Socialism.


Specifics examples to follow......

At it's core, leftism advances the idea that society should be ruled by a small elite with unlimited power. Of course, the average leftist will dispute this, but not logically.

Anyone who has bothered to study history knows power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. History tells us this kind of 'government' arrangement leads to massive death, destruction, and terrible suffering. Again leftists not knowing anything of history, will dispute this and again not logically.

the leftist are attempting to pollute the US with the same leftist agenda that has europe all fked up right now. The US people are too smart to allow that to happen and why we see the contention today. Trump has exposed the European and Islamic directive to take over countries, especially the US. Kill the beast and the world is theirs. It is our moral objective to shut this fking evil down.

Iran deal
Paris Accord
Even the Uranium deal with Russia

and any other objective that was set up by obummer. Obummer was the conduit into the country for these fks. Again, thank gd for trump.

 

[alang1216]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

".... it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues."

Of course, you're an imbecile.


Watch me prove how truly stupid the 'flip' myth is:

What the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as you do, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for your news.....

.....what are the chances would be that you woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican......you know....'flipping.'




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

You have it completely wrong. The voters never changed their values, the parties did. Is the party of Lincoln the same party as that of Trump? I see no similarities.

"I see no similarities."

The list of things you don't see is endless.
That's why I described you as a dunce.


The parties never changed: the Republicans were created to fight the slavery party, the Democrats.

Even a dunce should see the consistency, as the personification of the Democrat Party....Bill Clinton....has been a racist his entire life.

Challenge me on that, dunce.

I have no idea what Bill Clinton believes about race but he is not the Dem party. The party of Lincoln would never nominate him today. Challenge me on that!

 

[PoliticalChic]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

".... it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues."

Of course, you're an imbecile.


Watch me prove how truly stupid the 'flip' myth is:

What the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as you do, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for your news.....

.....what are the chances would be that you woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican......you know....'flipping.'




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

PC I was a republican all my life even voted for GWB in 2000 That was the last time I'll ever vote repub again

Now...let's be clear: 'racism,' if it's any individual's opinion of another individual, or even of another race......
...is that person's right.

We don't criminalize thoughts.


Now...let's have your examples of:
a. laws that single out a race in a negative way....you seem copacetic if laws single out a particular race in a positive way (affirmative action).

b. find 'racism' that actually hurts more than feelings.



And....I believe I just proved that you can't.



QED....there is neither institutional nor widespread racism.....no more against blacks than against any other group.

Admit it.

How about the law in Wisconsin that says you need a drivers license or passport to vote ? Think that effects lower income people of color ?? ...in a state repubs won by only 23000 votes??

"? Think that effects lower income people of color ??"

Of course not.


You need a photo ID even to collect government benefits.


You might find this informative:

“The findings of this analysis suggest that voter identification requirements, such as requiring non-photo and photo identification, have virtually no suppressive effect on reported voter turnout.

Controlling for factors that influence voter turn¬out, states with stricter voter identification laws largely do not have the claimed negative impact on voter turnout when compared to states with more lenient voter identification laws.

Based on the Eagleton Institute's findings, some members of the media have claimed that voter identification law suppress voter turnout, especially among minorities.[80] Their conclusion is unfounded. When statistically significant and negative relationships are found in our analysis, the effects are so small that the findings offer little policy significance.

More important, minority respondents in states that required photo identification are just as likely to report voting as are minority respondents from states that only required voters to say their name.”

For a thorough statistical analysis of the effect of voter identification requirements:
New Analysis Shows Voter Identification Laws Do Not Reduce Turnout

New Analysis Shows Voter Identification Laws Do Not Reduce Turnout

You may find information about the Eagleton Institution here:
Eagleton Institute of Politics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Marion Morrison]

Can y'all just imagine PC's desktop? Full of categorized folders, it has to be.

 

[eddiew37]

Can y'all just imagine PC's desktop? Full of categorized folders, it has to be.

what a piece of work the stuff she comes up with She could get a job on FOX

 

[PoliticalChic]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

".... it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues."

Of course, you're an imbecile.


Watch me prove how truly stupid the 'flip' myth is:

What the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as you do, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for your news.....

.....what are the chances would be that you woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican......you know....'flipping.'




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

You have it completely wrong. The voters never changed their values, the parties did. Is the party of Lincoln the same party as that of Trump? I see no similarities.

"I see no similarities."

The list of things you don't see is endless.
That's why I described you as a dunce.


The parties never changed: the Republicans were created to fight the slavery party, the Democrats.

Even a dunce should see the consistency, as the personification of the Democrat Party....Bill Clinton....has been a racist his entire life.

Challenge me on that, dunce.

I have no idea what Bill Clinton believes about race but he is not the Dem party. The party of Lincoln would never nominate him today. Challenge me on that!

OK...OK....so you're a liar AND a dunce.



Bill Clinton was prevailed upon to make certain Obama won his re-election:

www.cnn.com/.../bill-clinton-dnc-speech-preview-serfaty-wolf-pkg....
Jul 26, 2016
"Former President Bill Clinton will deliver the keynote address on Tuesday night at the Democratic National ..."



So, you've inadvertently admitted that the personification of the Democrat Party has been a racist his entire life.

Excellent.

 

[GreenBean]

Back on point:

The premise of this thread is that reliable Democrat voters, Liberals, have been well trained to accept any statements, policies, that their masters roll out.

...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

you dolts have been buying trump bs from the day that he stepped on the stage with 16 of his betters and you say dems have ? lol

Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

PC sinceyou asked It's not so much what the DEMS say it's the vile bull bleep that come from republicans that rubs me the wrong way

Such as .....

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. There is the axiom 'In the marketplace of ideas, the Right eats the Left's lunch.'


Coulter put it this way:
"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"




2. If, as many of us on the Right do, you applaud logic and education as the basis of your worldview, then you should be able to support said views.
You can't: you support them based on repetition and the fear of retribution if you question them.

I can pose several questions that show the weaknesses of the Left's doctrines, and policies, and for which Leftist drones will have no way to dispute same.
But...unable to dispute the Right's arguments, the Left has a very effective method of side-stepping the issues.......they lie.

In order to hide the flaws in the Left's dogma, a number of fallacies are published and advanced. Several of the most blatant lies are as follows:

a. It was the group known today as Liberals founded the country and produced the Constitution

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation. Oh...and the Democrats gave women the right to vote.

c. While communists are Leftist, like Liberals, the Nazis are Rightwing and far worse than communists.

d. America is such a racist and xenophopic nation that special classes of individuals must be created protected by government with special rights.

e. There is a 'Far Right' in this country that that works against traditional American values.
Oh....and the corollary to that, that there are Rightwing wealthy that are buying our government....and there there is some eternal group known as 'the rich.'



None of the above is based on truth, but control of the schools and the media by the Left has allowed many to be convinced that these are the facts.
They aren't.




The founding documents of the nation, the Declaration of Independence, and the United States Constitution, memorialize a nation built on specific principles, such as individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

The Left opposes all three of these founding principles.

By 'the Left,' I mean all six of these:
Communism, Nazism, Fascism, Modern Liberalism, Progressivism, and Socialism.


Specifics examples to follow......

At it's core, leftism advances the idea that society should be ruled by a small elite with unlimited power. Of course, the average leftist will dispute this, but not logically.

Anyone who has bothered to study history knows power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. History tells us this kind of 'government' arrangement leads to massive death, destruction, and terrible suffering. Again leftists not knowing anything of history, will dispute this and again not logically.

the leftist are attempting to pollute the US with the same leftist agenda that has europe all fked up right now. The US people are too smart to allow that to happen and why we see the contention today. Trump has exposed the European and Islamic directive to take over countries, especially the US. Kill the beast and the world is theirs. It is our moral objective to shut this fking evil down.

Iran deal
Paris Accord
Even the Uranium deal with Russia

and any other objective that was set up by obummer. Obummer was the conduit into the country for these fks. Again, thank gd for trump.

This is the Liberal Utopia of the EU:

"... the district court in Munich recently sentenced a German journalist, Michael Stürzenberger, to six months in jail for posting on his Facebook page a historical photo of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, shaking the hand of a senior Nazi official in Berlin in 1941. The prosecution accused Stürzenberger of "inciting hatred towards Islam" and "denigrating Islam" by publishing the photograph. The court found Stürzenberger guilty of "disseminating the propaganda of anti-constitutional organizations".


While the mutual admiration that once existed between al-Husseini and German Nazis is an undisputed historical fact, now evidently history is being rewritten by German courts. Stürzenberger has appealed the verdict.


Last year, London mayor Sadiq Khan's Office for Policing and Crime (Mopac) announced it was spending £1,730,726 of taxpayer money policing speech online after applying for a grant from the Home Office. Meanwhile, Khan said that he does not have the funds to monitor the 200 jihadists estimated to be in London, out of the 400 jihadists who have so far returned to the capital from Syria and Iraq.


When Morgan asked what could possibly be a bigger priority than, "people coming back from a Syrian battlefield with intent to harm British citizens", Khan did not answer. Perhaps because it is hard to admit in public that fighting "Islamophobia" is now a higher priority than fighting terrorism?"
Germany: Full Censorship Now Official


It's why Trump won the election.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Can y'all just imagine PC's desktop? Full of categorized folders, it has to be.

Let's just say that no one loves research more than I.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Can y'all just imagine PC's desktop? Full of categorized folders, it has to be.

what a piece of work the stuff she comes up with She could get a job on FOX

1. There is the suggestion that I 'come up with' stuff.

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.
Hence...100% accurate, true and correct.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Can y'all just imagine PC's desktop? Full of categorized folders, it has to be.

Let's just say that no one loves research more than I.

Let's just say that's a very bold claim.

All I'll vouch for is you love it more than me.

You never know who's out there.

 

[alang1216]

So, you've inadvertently admitted that the personification of the Democrat Party has been a racist his entire life.

Excellent.

I doubt he is a life-long racist. Got evidence? Do you hold Republicans to the same standard?

Even if what you say is true I do believe Bill Clinton is popular in spite of any racism, not because of it.

 

[Marion Morrison]

So, you've inadvertently admitted that the personification of the Democrat Party has been a racist his entire life.

Excellent.

I doubt he is a life-long racist. Got evidence? Do you hold Republicans to the same standard?

Even if what you say is true I do believe Bill Clinton is popular in spite of any racism, not because of it.

Bill Clinton isn't that racist and his wife hates him for it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Can y'all just imagine PC's desktop? Full of categorized folders, it has to be.

Let's just say that no one loves research more than I.

Let's just say that's a very bold claim.

All I'll vouch for is you love it more than me.

You never know who's out there.

Find someone.....double dog dare ya'...

 

[alang1216]

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.
Hence...100% accurate, true and correct.

Yet when others come up with posts that are linked, sourced and documented you don't always believe them. Why is that?