gallantwarrior
Gold Member
- Jul 25, 2011
- 25,746
- 7,617
A buddy of mine has a German Shepard. Personally, I would have put that thing down long ago. I'm surprised he hasn't had to pay a lawsuit or lost that animal to animal control. It's bitten several other dogs and a few people, but fortunately for my friend, no one has pressed charges. I would not own an animal with that kind of aggressive instinct. He loves that thing, though...I talked to buddies at lunch about this. They have softened me a little on this issue. They remind me that when we were kids, Doberman's had a bad rap before Pitbulls. And they all had stories about how they all know people with great pitbulls or they had them themselves.Insurance companies charge based on riskAnd that is their argument. Because not all pit bulls are vicious none should be accountable
Owners need to be held accountable.
Agree
Let the insurance companies make it unaffordable to own a pit bull
Insurance needs to charge what they need to charge to make a profit. Why are you in favor of insurance companies making obscene profits. I thought you liberals hate obscene profits?
If you own a pit bull, you are a greater risk
But they admitted you got to be careful with them and a lot of bad owners. They agreed maybe not every tom dick and harry should have a pitbull. Even with a fence those things need to be on a leash. So we just gotta make sure people in white trashville and the hood keep their dogs properly secured. Or wherever there is a irresponsible dog owner. But I still wouldn't lose sleep if they stopped making pits.