Lindsay Lohan to pose for Playboy

[BDBoop]

You keep setting the standard there, sunshine. However, I won't act on your - what. Suggestion? Orders? I prefer to go with the 'whatsoever' school of thought. You might want to consider it sometime.

And put some clothes on.

Phil 4:8 8 Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things.

 

[Mr Natural]

So? I dont' care what they put on the cover. The cover is meant to make it palatable for the masses, to make it APPEAR wholesome.

It's not wholesome, however, and it's porn. You won't see me whining about Vogue or Redbook or even SI's swimsuit issues....it's not about the cover.

There's no "money shot" in Playboy.

No money shot, no porn.

Sorry, you lose.

 

[BDBoop]

I'm still laughing at "You know she wants to." 53 y/o grandmother of soon to be seven, only ever been with males, - but suddenly I want to do what now?

 

[High_Gravity]

So? I dont' care what they put on the cover. The cover is meant to make it palatable for the masses, to make it APPEAR wholesome.

It's not wholesome, however, and it's porn. You won't see me whining about Vogue or Redbook or even SI's swimsuit issues....it's not about the cover.

There's no "money shot" in Playboy.

No money shot, no porn.

Sorry, you lose.

Correct, playboy doesn't even have the girls engage in sex acts like other more racy magazines like Swank, Hustler and Club, in those magazines the girls are engaged in sex acts with men and other women so they qualify as porn, saying Playboy is porn is stretching it.

 

[High_Gravity]

I'm still laughing at "You know she wants to." 53 y/o grandmother of soon to be seven, only ever been with males, - but suddenly I want to do what now?

Theres always a first time.

 

[BDBoop]

I'm still laughing at "You know she wants to." 53 y/o grandmother of soon to be seven, only ever been with males, - but suddenly I want to do what now?

Theres always a first time.

Yeah, my mind isn't nailed shut on that front.

But I am nowhere near ready to dip tootsie in that particular pool.

Not that there's anything wrong with that!

 

[Dot Com]

So? I dont' care what they put on the cover. The cover is meant to make it palatable for the masses, to make it APPEAR wholesome.

It's not wholesome, however, and it's porn. You won't see me whining about Vogue or Redbook or even SI's swimsuit issues....it's not about the cover.

You remind me of Ashcroft when he had those drapes over the Spirit of Justice statue You must abhor art class as well eh?
USATODAY.com - Justice Department covers partially nude statues

 

[geauxtohell]

yeah, we all know how wholesome the girls who hang at the Playboy mansion are.

I don't know any of them personally, do you?

I avoid orgies, thanks. I don't have to be acquainted with the participants to know they aren't wholesome, though. So spare me. And the fucks who look at my daughter and see a piece of meat will find out what a piece of meat feels like.

Considering your avatar, I am just curious if your toe was stuck in the track when the irony train hit you.

Men saw women as sexual objects before Playboy was conceived wand will do so afterwards.

Quit bitching about what others do in the privacy of their own home and mind your own and it shouldn't be a problem.

Damn. Talk about tangential thinking. What in the hell does Lindsey Lohan + Playboy have to do with your family members?

 

[High_Gravity]

I don't know any of them personally, do you?

I avoid orgies, thanks. I don't have to be acquainted with the participants to know they aren't wholesome, though. So spare me. And the fucks who look at my daughter and see a piece of meat will find out what a piece of meat feels like.

Considering your avatar, I am just curious if your toe was stuck in the track when the irony train hit you.

Men saw women as sexual objects before Playboy was conceived wand will do so afterwards.

Quit bitching about what others do in the privacy of their own home and mind your own and it shouldn't be a problem.

Damn. Talk about tangential thinking. What in the hell does Lindsey Lohan + Playboy have to do with your family members?

 

[geauxtohell]

Still not clothing. Try again.

That ensemble doesn't require an imagination.

Actually it looks about like something playboy would use as a cover shot.

I think I see the bunny.

 

[geauxtohell]

So? I dont' care what they put on the cover. The cover is meant to make it palatable for the masses, to make it APPEAR wholesome.

It's not wholesome, however, and it's porn. You won't see me whining about Vogue or Redbook or even SI's swimsuit issues....it's not about the cover.

Define "pornography".

 

[geauxtohell]

So? I dont' care what they put on the cover. The cover is meant to make it palatable for the masses, to make it APPEAR wholesome.

It's not wholesome, however, and it's porn. You won't see me whining about Vogue or Redbook or even SI's swimsuit issues....it's not about the cover.

I think the more interesting question is why you feel the need to have that as your avatar.

Or, more bluntly: "You aren't fooling anybody."

 

[High_Gravity]

So? I dont' care what they put on the cover. The cover is meant to make it palatable for the masses, to make it APPEAR wholesome.

It's not wholesome, however, and it's porn. You won't see me whining about Vogue or Redbook or even SI's swimsuit issues....it's not about the cover.

I think the more interesting question is why you feel the need to have that as your avatar.

Or, more bluntly: "You aren't fooling anybody."

Ironically the girl in her avatar looks like the adult film star Aurora Snow.

 

[syrenn]

Suck my left tit, you stupid twat.

Whoa, that was uncalled for.

Ah that under the skin thing. A nerve must have been struck.

 

[BDBoop]

So? I dont' care what they put on the cover. The cover is meant to make it palatable for the masses, to make it APPEAR wholesome.

It's not wholesome, however, and it's porn. You won't see me whining about Vogue or Redbook or even SI's swimsuit issues....it's not about the cover.

I think the more interesting question is why you feel the need to have that as your avatar.

Or, more bluntly: "You aren't fooling anybody."

Or even more bluntly, "If Playboy is porn, then so is her avatar."

 

[syrenn]

My avie isn't a playboy centerfold, sorry.

No... but it is the EXACT thing they would put on the cover. Just enough covered up to pass the censor.

 

[geauxtohell]

My avie isn't a playboy centerfold, sorry.

No... but it is the EXACT thing they would put on the cover. Just enough covered up to pass the censor.

Which means KG thinks she's got just enough moral high ground to think she has a shred of credibility on this issue.

 

[syrenn]

So? I dont' care what they put on the cover. The cover is meant to make it palatable for the masses, to make it APPEAR wholesome.

It's not wholesome, however, and it's porn. You won't see me whining about Vogue or Redbook or even SI's swimsuit issues....it's not about the cover.

Just think of playboy as the the hot romance novels for men. You know the ones for women... they stock the supermarkets with them at the check out stand. The soft pron for women is quite a hot seller ya know... they just call it romance.

 

[Dot Com]

Its analogous to jumping head-first into a "murder is wrong" thread w/ a Manson avatar

 

[High_Gravity]

My avie isn't a playboy centerfold, sorry.

No... but it is the EXACT thing they would put on the cover. Just enough covered up to pass the censor.

Which means KG thinks she's got just enough moral high ground to think she has a shred of credibility on this issue.

Plus if you are against porn supposedly, why would tell you another woman to suck your left tit?