Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
What did you think of the video with the questions, and answers provided?Are you kidding? Graham could not scare a 6 year old.
Graham is the ultimate establishment tool, He is not going to upset the apple cart
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
On the one hand, I agree with you.Are you kidding? Graham could not scare a 6 year old.
Graham is the ultimate establishment tool, He is not going to upset the apple cart
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
On the one hand, I agree with you.Are you kidding? Graham could not scare a 6 year old.
Graham is the ultimate establishment tool, He is not going to upset the apple cart
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
OTH, I think he is more attached to process over policy. I think he might see a chance to score some huge political points here if he is seen as the one that cleans up this mess between Trump and the Deep State.
If he is seen as the one responsible for the conviction of Hillary Clinton, I don't care how conservatives feel about queers, he'd be a shoe in.
Remember, he has always wanted to be the first gay president. (Excluding Buchanan. . . of course.)
What did you think of the video with the questions, and answers provided?Are you kidding? Graham could not scare a 6 year old.
Graham is the ultimate establishment tool, He is not going to upset the apple cart
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
-Geaux
and there you have it. These two dudes look scared to death. Mr Graham laid it out beautifully.
Watch and you decide
-Geaux
-----------
What did you think of the video with the questions, and answers provided?Are you kidding? Graham could not scare a 6 year old.
Graham is the ultimate establishment tool, He is not going to upset the apple cart
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
-Geaux
What did you think of the video with the questions, and answers provided?Are you kidding? Graham could not scare a 6 year old.
Graham is the ultimate establishment tool, He is not going to upset the apple cart
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
-Geaux
The answers were weak and the questions were just a rehash of what we already know.
On the one hand, I agree with you.Are you kidding? Graham could not scare a 6 year old.
Graham is the ultimate establishment tool, He is not going to upset the apple cart
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
OTH, I think he is more attached to process over policy. I think he might see a chance to score some huge political points here if he is seen as the one that cleans up this mess between Trump and the Deep State.
If he is seen as the one responsible for the conviction of Hillary Clinton, I don't care how conservatives feel about queers, he'd be a shoe in.
Remember, he has always wanted to be the first gay president. (Excluding Buchanan. . . of course.)
That ship sailed''
Obama won on two fronts as the first half black gay POTUS
-Geaux
and there you have it. These two dudes look scared to death. Mr Graham laid it out beautifully.
Watch and you decide
-Geaux
-----------
and there you have it. These two dudes look scared to death. Mr Graham laid it out beautifully.
Watch and you decide
-Geaux
-----------
and there you have it. These two dudes look scared to death. Mr Graham laid it out beautifully.
Watch and you decide
-Geaux
-----------
Glad he went the circumstantial evidence route
and there you have it. These two dudes look scared to death. Mr Graham laid it out beautifully.
Watch and you decide
-Geaux
-----------
Glad he went the circumstantial evidence route
and there you have it. These two dudes look scared to death. Mr Graham laid it out beautifully.
Watch and you decide
-Geaux
-----------
Glad he went the circumstantial evidence route
Circumstantial? When we have the hard evidence of the e-mails and text messages in their own words to look at? But even if you could extrapolate that into being circumstantial evidence, if the circumstantial evidence is strong enough, a guilty verdict must ethically be rendered. People have been sentenced to death based on little more than circumstantial evidence. Think Scott Peterson.