Lindsey Graham

Wants to be Trump' s New Attorney General to replace Jeff Sessions.

How do you think he's doing in his 'try out' ?
Graham stated my thoughts right on the head, and more. This whole can of crap is what the Progressive are pushing and the Troll fall right into it and throw it out. Anyone who knows about this delay trick has never taken Political Theory in College and understood everything from Ham bone, to the Slippery slope that they use. It is the same as using the Nuke on a chicken coup. View attachment 218898

I guess McConnell is the master of it.
Got to admire him.
Nothing about the pampered private school privileged bunch?. All kinds of Kennedy / judge / connections.
All that was missing was "lock her up"
Nothing like an unbiased supreme
Now we will have 1/3 of our male supremes accused of groping.
Great role models
 
I thought he did fine, I saw a man defending his honor. It was appropriate to the charges leveled against an innocent man. Which with the lack of evidence is what we currently have, a presumed innocent man.
Have some beers You and Blues are without hope You can't see the forest for the trees Typical of republicans

See what? What do you want me to see? Are we not presumed innocent in this country until proven guilty?
Care for all nailed it
he did not do fine as a person who is suppose to be a NEUTRAL, calm cool and collected, non-partisan, unbiased, JUDGE.

he did not, in any way shape or form, do fine...

HE SHOWED he can not be a neutral jurist.... he failed the job interview... no question about it.

pick another conservative judge, who is qualified, in both work ethics AND DEMEANOR.

He wasn’t a judge, he is a man trying to prove his innocence. You want him to be neutral in defending himself? WTF? During the confirmation hearings he was neutral, controlled and had a fine demeanor. His role Thursday was to defend his honor, his innocence, not be a judge and be neutral.
Well we knew he was 100% partisan when the moron picked him He just proved it
A kEn Starr devotee? What do we expect?
 
It is blatantly apparent that Christine Ford was never sexually assaulted.

facepalm-face-palm-facepalm-demotivational-poster-1223672935.jpg


Numbnuts even Trump said her testimony was credible.


So now you Moon Bats believe Trump? LOL!

Not for a second, but the REASON he says it is because he knows most people believed her and will think him an ass yet again for attacking her at a time when Republicans already have serious women problems in the polling.

After her testimony Bar Association came out against Kavanaugh nomination without FBI investigation and now so did Republicans critical to confirmation.

You could twist and twirl whatever bullshit you want in your little irrelevant head, but that’s the reality you ought to come to grips with.
Apparently the Democrats are turning women against them with their dishonest tactics.
Most women can see this for what it is.....because many of them have been through similar instances....and they're not buying Dr Ford's story.
They also can see why they waited till the last minute.
They know that the Democrats trashed Dr Ford and Judge Kavanaugh when they didn't have to simply to delay the vote.
The majority of Democrats ARE women nit wit.
No....the majority of women are liberals. Many of them don't want to be associated with what the Democrats have become.
 
Wants to be Trump' s New Attorney General to replace Jeff Sessions.

How do you think he's doing in his 'try out' ?
Graham stated my thoughts right on the head, and more. This whole can of crap is what the Progressive are pushing and the Troll fall right into it and throw it out. Anyone who knows about this delay trick has never taken Political Theory in College and understood everything from Ham bone, to the Slippery slope that they use. It is the same as using the Nuke on a chicken coup. View attachment 218898

I guess McConnell is the master of it.
Got to admire him.
Nothing about the pampered private school privileged bunch?. All kinds of Kennedy / judge / connections.
All that was missing was "lock her up"
Nothing like an unbiased supreme
Now we will have 1/3 of our male supremes accused of groping.
Great role models
/——/ 100% of the libtards here are accused of groping
 
Dem's planned and orchestrated this hit on Kavanaugh. They funded it, made sure Ford got the right attorney, leaked the letter, timed it, made sure her social media was scrubbed, pre-judged Kavanaugh's guilt and burned the guy at the stake in public.

The most insidious part of the Dem's plan was the way they made Kavanaugh look like he couldn't control his emotions. Fiendishly clever.

Its sexist to call a woman emotional, but not sexist to call a man emotional. If a man expresses emotion he's not in control.
Yes If a women cried and talked back etc etc you would be fine with it ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,If she was a republican partisan pos? Those are just the types repubs like you admire

You are not making any sense Eddie.
Hillary didn't weep cry talk back or rant FOR ELEVEN hours Kavanaugh is not in control of his emotions For dog catcher YES SC? NO
Nobody accused Hillary of sexual assault....and Hillary is a practiced liar. A compulsive liar. Judge Kavanaugh is not.
 
TDS alert! :p

The Senator simply told the truth. Hatch is now doing the same.


Indeed. Graham said what needed to be said. This is the ugliest political persecution since the McCarthy era.



It was uglier than McCarthy. Old Joe McCarthy never tried to persecute someone for allegations from high school
Hope our judge doesn't die of syphilis.
Extensive sex can do that


Could you possibly be more stupid?
 
TDS alert! :p

The Senator simply told the truth. Hatch is now doing the same.


Indeed. Graham said what needed to be said. This is the ugliest political persecution since the McCarthy era.



It was uglier than McCarthy. Old Joe McCarthy never tried to persecute someone for allegations from high school
Hope our judge doesn't die of syphilis.
Extensive sex can do that
/——/ just when I think libtards can’t sink any lower you come along and save the day.
 
facepalm-face-palm-facepalm-demotivational-poster-1223672935.jpg


Numbnuts even Trump said her testimony was credible.


So now you Moon Bats believe Trump? LOL!

Not for a second, but the REASON he says it is because he knows most people believed her and will think him an ass yet again for attacking her at a time when Republicans already have serious women problems in the polling.

After her testimony Bar Association came out against Kavanaugh nomination without FBI investigation and now so did Republicans critical to confirmation.

You could twist and twirl whatever bullshit you want in your little irrelevant head, but that’s the reality you ought to come to grips with.
Apparently the Democrats are turning women against them with their dishonest tactics.
Most women can see this for what it is.....because many of them have been through similar instances....and they're not buying Dr Ford's story.
They also can see why they waited till the last minute.
They know that the Democrats trashed Dr Ford and Judge Kavanaugh when they didn't have to simply to delay the vote.
The majority of Democrats ARE women nit wit.
No....the majority of women are liberals. Many of them don't want to be associated with what the Democrats have become.


Contrary to what the stupid Moon Bats will tell you most women think with their brains and not with their vaginas.

Most women care about the same things as men. Lower taxes, personal liberty, secured borders, sanctity of life and less regulations in their lives. They want this country to be great again, not a socialist shithole.
 
No she wasn't. She was never harassed by Kavanaugh. It was obvious she was tool of the Democrat's agenda to delay Trump's appointment until after the election in the delusion expectation the Moon Bats will take the Senate.

She lied out her ass and only stupid Libtards believe her.

You are confused about the difference between being unstable and being morally outraged at the dishonesty of the Democrats. All Americans should be. The Democrats are the scum of this country.
I'm not a democrat, so everything I said was true.
 
She claims it happened the other two that were allegedly in the room said it did not. Her friend who was supposed to be at the same party claimed she wasn’t there and didn’t know Kavanaugh. There is no physical evidence, no corroboration to anything. She went 30 years and suddenly remembered, that is a symptom of FMS.

I watched the hearing and he looked like a man that was being falsely accused. I’d be upset as well.

Until there is real solid evidence, it is his word against his and I side with innocent until proven guilty.
He's already lied under oath and two of his classmates stated he was a college drunk.
 
So now you Moon Bats believe Trump? LOL!

Not for a second, but the REASON he says it is because he knows most people believed her and will think him an ass yet again for attacking her at a time when Republicans already have serious women problems in the polling.

After her testimony Bar Association came out against Kavanaugh nomination without FBI investigation and now so did Republicans critical to confirmation.

You could twist and twirl whatever bullshit you want in your little irrelevant head, but that’s the reality you ought to come to grips with.
Apparently the Democrats are turning women against them with their dishonest tactics.
Most women can see this for what it is.....because many of them have been through similar instances....and they're not buying Dr Ford's story.
They also can see why they waited till the last minute.
They know that the Democrats trashed Dr Ford and Judge Kavanaugh when they didn't have to simply to delay the vote.

Dem's planned and orchestrated this hit on Kavanaugh. They funded it, made sure Ford got the right attorney, leaked the letter, timed it, made sure her social media was scrubbed, pre-judged Kavanaugh's guilt and burned the guy at the stake in public.

The most insidious part of the Dem's plan was the way they made Kavanaugh look like he couldn't control his emotions. Fiendishly clever.

Its sexist to call a woman emotional, but not sexist to call a man emotional. If a man expresses emotion he's not in control.
If Kagan or Ginsburg had gotten in front of the committee and bawled like that, you wouldn't say a word about it? Oh PLEASE.
 
Go ahead she's outside, terrified Kavanaugh will chase her down and murder her, what happened next?
Republicans nominate a sex offender.


The Democrats will forget about that bullshit , if they can run out the clock until election day, Bill.

If they can drag it out 5 weeks, Kav is history. Either defeated with a new Dem majority or withdrawn by President Trump in favor of a Hardcore conservative candidate in the Republicans win the election.
 
Every time I discussed it would upset me. Especially when I’m innocent. Had he been emotionless you would have said that he was to calm.

The bigger issue is the lack of evidence. Her friend never met Kavanaugh in a party of five? Serious hole in the story. She doesn’t know where, when, day of the week,didn’t know how she got home, both Judge and Kavanugh deny Even being in a room alone with her. The other two that were supposed to be there dont remember the party at all. Sudden memory after 30 years?

Accusations don’t make you guilty, being upset that you have been accused don’t make you guilty, evidence does and there is none.
I bet Lebron knows what happened.
 
No she wasn't. She was never harassed by Kavanaugh. It was obvious she was tool of the Democrat's agenda to delay Trump's appointment until after the election in the delusion expectation the Moon Bats will take the Senate.

She lied out her ass and only stupid Libtards believe her.

You are confused about the difference between being unstable and being morally outraged at the dishonesty of the Democrats. All Americans should be. The Democrats are the scum of this country.
I'm not a democrat, so everything I said was true.


I am not a Republican and everything I say is true.
 
Any real
So if he attacks his accuser you assholes would jump all over him, if he is to calm, you asshole would jump all over him. The bottom line it didn’t matter what he said or how he handled himself you assholes would point to it as a sure sign of guilt.

Look at the evidence and there is something wrong, no one including her friend can place her and Kavanaugh at a house nobody knows where it is located at a party where 5 out of the 6 people can remember ever happening. She recovered a memory 30 years after the fact because she went to a therapist because you wanted two front doors. Does she believe she is 100% accurate, yes however that doesn’t make it so. I am still going on the innocent until proven guilty concept.

Whoop there you go again deflecting to someone else.

It’s about Kavanaugh’s anger and conspiracy theorizing not making any sense. That doesn’t change just because someone may slam him for what would be a REASONABLE response of getting mad at the woman who is falsely accusing him.

I thought he did fine, I saw a man defending his honor. It was appropriate to the charges leveled against an innocent man. Which with the lack of evidence is what we currently have, a presumed innocent man.
no

he did not do fine as a person who is suppose to be a NEUTRAL, calm cool and collected, non-partisan, unbiased, independent of politics,JUDGE.

he did not, in any way shape or form, do fine...

HE SHOWED he can not be a neutral jurist.... he failed the job interview... no question about it.

pick another conservative judge, who is qualified, in both work ethics AND DEMEANOR.

I don’t pick judges, some thought he did fine on the stand and some thought he didn’t, that is all opinion and conjecture. And you really expect a man who knows he is innocent to be neutral?

I’m more concerned about an innocent man having his life ripped because of an accusation that has no evidence, is this the new standard? This is another McMartin case, another Salem witch trial. He maybe guilty, I have no idea howev,er that seems to not be important. I don’t think Kavanaugh is confirmed and I can see Trump putting in a further right leaning judge and then another and finally Trump will get his way because this country will tire of the process and most Americans aren’t as bigot and partisan as we see on this board.
yes, of course he should be composed... he's a judge, on an interview... not some privileged kid going to a $60k a year high school throwing a tantrum filled with visceral, lies, and bias out, playing to conspiracy theories etc.

THIS WAS NOT him running for a political campaign spot.... he made it in to one with wild and crazy accusations...

HE CAN NOT BE a neutral judge on any issue that makes it to the Supreme court on the divide of a political difference between democrats and republicans... which the Dems and the Repubs get to the supreme court ALL THE TIME.

He would ethically have to recuse himself for anything involving suits by parties and congress/senate members.

He can not be seated as a SC justice, on that alone... otherwise you destroy justice or even the resemblance of it.

I didn’t see him that way. IMHO.

He was defending himself on unsubstantiated allegations, to me if you are defending yourself instead of asking your views it is quite different. Had he not been passionate I would have wondered.

Should Ginsburg recuse herself in any case involving Trump?

I don’t think will affect his impartiality in fact it will help him see both sides of every case having gone through the process.
 
Any real
So if he attacks his accuser you assholes would jump all over him, if he is to calm, you asshole would jump all over him. The bottom line it didn’t matter what he said or how he handled himself you assholes would point to it as a sure sign of guilt.

Look at the evidence and there is something wrong, no one including her friend can place her and Kavanaugh at a house nobody knows where it is located at a party where 5 out of the 6 people can remember ever happening. She recovered a memory 30 years after the fact because she went to a therapist because you wanted two front doors. Does she believe she is 100% accurate, yes however that doesn’t make it so. I am still going on the innocent until proven guilty concept.

Whoop there you go again deflecting to someone else.

It’s about Kavanaugh’s anger and conspiracy theorizing not making any sense. That doesn’t change just because someone may slam him for what would be a REASONABLE response of getting mad at the woman who is falsely accusing him.

I thought he did fine, I saw a man defending his honor. It was appropriate to the charges leveled against an innocent man. Which with the lack of evidence is what we currently have, a presumed innocent man.
Have some beers You and Blues are without hope You can't see the forest for the trees Typical of republicans

See what? What do you want me to see? Are we not presumed innocent in this country until proven guilty?

LIES Lies and more lies
Early Friday morning, the AP reported that, the day before, Judge Brett Kavanaugh "misstated" the drinking age in Maryland when he recalled his days of downing brewskis with P.J. and Squi. From Time:
The legal age in that state was raised to 21 on July 1, 1982; Kavanaugh did not turn 18 until Feb. 12, 1983. In a Fox News interview on Monday, Kavanaugh said, “Yes, there were parties. And the drinking age was 18. And yes, the seniors were legal.” In testimony Thursday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, he said all of his comments during the Fox interview were accurate and could be made part of the record.
.
In plain terms, for all his spleen and outrage, Judge Kavanaugh lies about everything. In his earlier hearings, he lied about his judicial philosophy, and he lied about his days as a Republican operative, both in and out of the White House. On Monday, he lied to Martha McCallum of Fox News. On Thursday, he lied about his entire adolescence and his college days.
.
He lied even when he didn't have to lie. He lied in preposterous ways easily disproven by common sense. (The "Devil's Triangle"? "Renate Alumnius"?) He lied like a toddler, like a guilty adolescent, and like a privileged scion of the white ruling class, which is a continuum with which we all are far too familiar. He lied and he dared the Democratic members of the committee, and the country, to call him on his lies. And now, he is a couple of easy steps away from having lied his way into a lifetime seat on the United States Supreme Court. This guy is going to be deciding constitutional issues for the next four decades, and the truth is not in him.
.
=========================

That is your opinion. So underage drinking now disqualifies a person from being a Supreme Court Justice?

We are going to hold a guy to remember the drinking age in his state 36 years ago? I wouldn’t be able to give you
The drinking age in my state 36 years ago. You already made up your mind long before the allegation came up an you are continuing in your bigotry and hate.
 

Forum List

Back
Top