Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,452
- 82,315
- 2,635
I will keep your assertion in mind and when/if I get the chance to bring something new to the matter, I will be sure to share it.List the Top 10 Dem or GOP unresolved issues needing investigation +/or trial
Benghazi
Obama's full biography
The Russia hoax
There MAY be more added later.
Benghazi had 7 investigations, including several that Democrats refused to participate in, and nothing was found out in the 7th investigation that wasn't known after the first.
Obama isn't President. Trump admitted he lied about Obama's birth certificate. It's over.
The Russian Investigation, which has thus far produced over 100 charges, 6 guilty pleas, and three conspirators are currently in jail, with more headed in that direction, is continuing. The only "hoax" is Trump's initial denials of any involvement.
Explain this.
Arpaio Press Conference re: Forged Birth Certificate
The video concludes with absolute certainty and scientific proof that the birth certificate tendered to the Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff's office for forensic testing was a forged document.
100% certain.
And you will see how the forgery was done because they reproduced the result after they figured out how it was forged.
There would be no humanly possible way for the document to be authentic.
If you like CSI and law enforcement forensics (I miss Abby Sciutto), you will enjoy this video.
The video is a proven lie.
See if you can explain why this...
![]()
... is not identical to this ...
![]()
... and just in case you’re too ignorant to spot the differences, you’ll note in the top image, the bottom of the ‘O’ is higher than the other letters, whereas it’s even on the bottom image.
On top, the ‘a’ and ‘h’ are touching, but not on the bottom image. And the ‘u’ is bolder on the top image.
According to Arpaio, someone copied and pasted these grapghic images from another birth certificate onto Obama’s. If that were true, the two images would be identical. If they’re not identical down to the last pixel, and they’re not, that because Arpaio lies and you’re foolish enough, and desperate enough, to fall for his rouse.
In the meantime, I have noticed that neither side seems to be attacking or defending or much commenting on this.
They say that in astronomy the way to detect a black hole is to notice a LACK of any light in an area.
Similarly, the fact that there is nothing being made of this by either side seems odd.
Lee has disengaged from this exchange.
Translation: Lee is defeated