Listen to the exact words in the exact books Democrats want in our public school libraries

[DBA]

^ Too fucking sensible.

Completely non-sensible actually.

 

[DBA]

You misunderstood me. I'm fine with me deciding what my child reads but I'm not OK with you banning books that I might want my child to have access to.

If a parent wants their kid to have access to hard-core porn, beastiality, etc. in the public school library, you are ok with this being there? I think most of you must not have children and just spout a bunch of theory because it seems logical to you, but don’t have to live with the results.

 

[AMart]

No elected Democrat has spoken out about this, which can only lead to the assumption that they approve of it.

Democrats should be castrated, all of them.

 

[MinTrut]

17 pages of this rodent

You're a rodent?

I thought you might be a bot...

defending groomers and pedophiles

That's what you guys do alright - as long as they're heterosexual that is.

and comparing the Bible to pornography for little kids.

The Bible is far worse than pornography.

Pornography would just confuse/bore kids.

The Bible terrorizes them as it grooms them.

Absolutely abhorrent and disgusting.

Well, the Bible is what it is - it has its good points too!

However, it is proof that the modern Leftist

There are no leftists posting to this thread.

is okay with normalizing sex among children.

I don't know about that, but conservatives love them some Bible tales of 3 year old brides and so on.

May all the Leftists burn in hell for all eternity.

Will there be room with all the conservatives headed there?

 

[MinTrut]

You make a specious claim about the Bible yet provide nothing to back it up.

Nope.

I've provided several examples, as has JoeB.

His post includes numerous links as well.

You could read all of that, or, you know, just read the Bible.

Would it go up in flames if you touched it or something?

 

[JoeB131]

That you and your kind call it “homophobia” to want to protect children from sexual abuse amounts to an admission that homosexuals are disproportionately prone to sexually abusing children.

Not really. Most child sexual abuse is adult males abusing underage females.

And I'm going to ask you to follow my father-in-law"s final example. It worked for him; surely it can cure you as well.

But according to your own narrative, he was an adult male who abused female children. What does that have to do with gay people?

 

[MinTrut]

That rodent is mocking the Bible and defending the groomers

Wait - I thought you were defending the Bible AND the many groomers/child rapists praised therein?

You guys are SOOOOOOO confusing!

 

[MinTrut]

Are you attempting to make the argument that it is “censorship” if any books are banned in school libraries and thus no books should be banned? We censor things everyday, particularly from children don’t have the knowledge or fortitude to not know what is good for them and what is not. There is a rating system on movies and children can’t attend a rated R movie without an adult. Children can’t walk into a convenience store and buy a pornographic magazine. They can’t go into “adult” video/book stores. There are certain things that can’t be portrayed on public TV because it is too easily accessible by children. Maybe it is censorship to not allow books like what was read by the Sen. in school libraries, but not any more so than all of the things mentioned above. Are you advocating that all age restrictions be removed everywhere?

Are you advocating for the banning of the Bible from school libraries?

You said you weren't, but the above makes it very clear you feel the Bible SHOULD be banned.

 

[DBA]

You're a rodent?

I thought you might be a bot...

That's what you guys do alright - as long as they're heterosexual that is.

The Bible is far worse than pornography.

Pornography would just confuse/bore kids.

The Bible terrorizes them as it grooms them.

Well, the Bible is what it is - it has its good points too!

There are no leftists posting to this thread.

I don't know about that, but conservatives love them some Bible tales of 3 year old brides and so on.

Will there be room with all the conservatives headed there?

Now I see where you are coming from…a place absent of moral absolutes, which is exactly what the Democratic Party promotes.

Your comprehension of the Bible is extremely ignorant, though I have always found it interesting that those that are almost militantly opposed to it and its teachings see themselves as the foremost experts and interpreters of the content.

 

[DBA]

Are you advocating for the banning of the Bible from school libraries?

You said you weren't, but the above makes it very clear you feel the Bible SHOULD be banned.

Share passages in the Bible that align with what was read from these books.

 

[MinTrut]

Not at all. What I am saying, and what you seem to agree with, is that there must be a line drawn somewhere. Explicit sex acts, like those read by the Sen., is well past the line for kids to be reading. The left is always moving the line a little further and further. At the rate we are going, the things I mention in my previous post will also be ok at some point. Progressivism must be finite, reaching hard lines at some point that cannot be crossed, otherwise, we end up like Rome.

I appreciate the clarification.

I propose that the line be drawn so that Lawn Boy and the Bible are available to those who are 12+ if they seek these books out.

But let's face it - kids aren't going to read either; too much TikTok!

 

[MinTrut]

If a parent wants their kid to have access to hard-core porn, beastiality, etc. in the public school library, you are ok with this being there?

^ Bizarre straw man argument.

No one's advocating for that.

I think most of you must not have children and just spout a bunch of theory because it seems logical to you, but don’t have to live with the results.

You're spouting straw.

 

[MinTrut]

Democrats should be castrated, all of them.

THAT's the spirit - you must be a Bible reader.

 

[JoeB131]

Are you attempting to make the argument that it is “censorship” if any books are banned in school libraries and thus no books should be banned? We censor things everyday, particularly from children don’t have the knowledge or fortitude to not know what is good for them and what is not. There is a rating system on movies and children can’t attend a rated R movie without an adult. Children can’t walk into a convenience store and buy a pornographic magazine. They can’t go into “adult” video/book stores. There are certain things that can’t be portrayed on public TV because it is too easily accessible by children. Maybe it is censorship to not allow books like what was read by the Sen. in school libraries, but not any more so than all of the things mentioned above. Are you advocating that all age restrictions be removed everywhere?

Here's the thing... When I was a child growing up in the 1970's we had absolutely no problem getting pornographic magazines, usually stolen from the adults in our lives. And we didn't even have the internet. The idea that we 'Need to ban books" from the library is kind of silly, given the kids can get far more salacious material on line if they are so inclined.

So this isn't about "protecting" children but about indoctrinating them. Don't you dare let little Timmy see that it's okay to be gay. Nope, just keep screaming bible verses at him. Just not the bible verses involving rape, pedophilia, human sacrifice, cannibalism, incest, or genocide.

 

[MinTrut]

Not really. Most child sexual abuse is adult males abusing underage females.



But according to your own narrative, he was an adult male who abused female children. What does that have to do with gay people?

^ JoeB gets it right again.

You may be a decent egg after all...

The thing is, and you and I both know this, the thing is that it's not about protecting kids.

Not at all.

It's about their profound homophobia, and they're using this insane argument to justify that homophobia.

It's really that simple.

Their need to control what children read, what women do with their bodies...

It's scary.

Like Bible scary.

 

[SeaMajor7]

^ JoeB gets it right again.

You may be a decent egg after all...

The thing is, and you and I both know this, the thing is that it's not about protecting kids.

Not at all.

It's about their profound homophobia, and they're using this insane argument to justify that homophobia.

It's really that simple.

Their need to control what children read, what women do with their bodies...

It's scary.

Like Bible scary.

^^^^Screwball^^^^

 

[MinTrut]

Now I see where you are coming from…

I don't think you do actually.

a place absent of moral absolutes,

As I thought - you don't.

which is exactly what the Democratic Party promotes.

One of two major criminal gangs.

Your comprehension of the Bible is extremely ignorant,

I don't think so.

though I have always found it interesting that those that are almost militantly opposed to it

I'm not the one who wants to ban it.

Or Lawn Boy.

and its teachings see themselves as the foremost experts and interpreters of the content.

Well, they are.

I'm a person of faith, but I've only bested an atheist in discussing the Bible ONCE!

 

[MinTrut]

Share passages in the Bible that align with what was read from these books.

Haven't you read the Bible?

Or this thread?

Many posts cite this content.

 

[MinTrut]

Here's the thing... When I was a child growing up in the 1970's we had absolutely no problem getting pornographic magazines, usually stolen from the adults in our lives. And we didn't even have the internet. The idea that we 'Need to ban books" from the library is kind of silly, given the kids can get far more salacious material on line if they are so inclined.

So this isn't about "protecting" children but about indoctrinating them. Don't you dare let little Timmy see that it's okay to be gay. Nope, just keep screaming bible verses at him. Just not the bible verses involving rape, pedophilia, human sacrifice, cannibalism, incest, or genocide.

And that's the win.

 

[Weatherman2020]

No elected Democrat has spoken out about this, which can only lead to the assumption that they approve of it.

The demonic left are out of the closet to groom children. If they’re not killing them in the womb, they’re either pushing to normalize pedophillia or cutting the tits off girls.