Learned a new word, did we? Well done.
Once I started interacting with dorks on the left? Seemed appropriate
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Learned a new word, did we? Well done.
And there we have it.So, you DO have a son and you want his sissy training to start around 11?
You believe sissy training should start at 11, otherwise a person is a homophobe?And there we have it.
This isn't about protecting children.
It's about homophobia.
The Bible's Rivka was 3 when she married a 40 year old.So the answers that you want him to find are that he should allow grown men to fuck him?
Moses - wotta hero!You want him sissy trained, true.
The quoted texts were from the standpoint of GIVING the blow jobs and RECEIVING the anal sex, and you want this presented to him when he is 11.
what a dad!!
Like the heroes of the Bible?All brought to him by authority figures he is told to trust.
Children should be taught to submit to the sacrificial knife & pyre like Isaac, right?After all, it is best for him to be taught to bottom by the same people who give him the grades that make or break his success in school.
Sounds very biblical to me, except it's girls being raped by men.I was an 11 year old molested by an adult. Luckily for me, it did not progress to rape.
You want 11 year old boys to be trained to see getting fucked as FUN.
What part of Hell contains those who obeyed the Law of Moses and abducted, trafficked and raped girls?So, books that instruct a boy how to give and receive oral and anal sex with grown men are “tools to defend themselves”?
These are not books to protect them from being molested. These are books to condition them to accept being molested.
And I do not think anyone needs to guess why it is that you want this kind of material to be provided to young boys. We're not allowed to say it, here, but your motive is plenty obvious.
When you get to Hell, look up Richard Ray Pierce (1942-1980). It is almost certain that you will wind up in the same part of Hell where he is. I think you'll find that you two have much in common.
I don't think they've even read the Bible.Have you read the books or did you just hear selected (cherry-picked) sections? I haven't read them but your claim doesn't pass the smell test.
The Bible says it's righteous for men to murder boys and rape girls.By giving them books that tell them that it is normal and proper for grown men to be fucking them?
So you MUST want to see the Bible banned in school libraries.The cherry-picked parts are quite good enough. The passages that Senator Kennedy read are damning. There is no case that you can make to argue that the passages that he read, and is show in video earlier is this thread reading, have any place in books aimed at minors.
In other threads, there have been other excerpts of material from “Gender Queer” that are equally damming.
It tells us that you are some sort of evil, soulless, subhuman piece of shit, that you would even think of defending such content in books meant for minors.
It tells us something else about you, that we're not allowed to say here, but it's pretty damn obvious. There is only one kind of fucked-up subhuman piece of shit that wants minors to be provided with material that tells them that it's OK for grown men to fuck them.
Give my regards to my father-in-law, when you arrive in Hell. You're certain to wind up the the same neighborhood down there, where he is.
You want the Bible banned as well?Thank you for putting it so bluntly.
Pedocrats count on us being too civil to call their policies out accurately.
An ironic query.I suppose a person does have to admire the chutzpa.
Yes -- teaching your 11 year old boy that he will enjoy taking it up the butt will give him the confidence to say no when somebody wants to do just that!
What's next, teaching your 9 year old girl that Semen tastes just like candy will help her when a group of men are about to turn her into a cum dumpster?
Do people even read the stupid shit they write?
You definitely need to follow my advice re: forum rules/local laws.My wife was eight when her father started doing that to her.
That went on for a couple years, before he cured himself with a .357-caliber lobotomy.
I think that a similar procedure would do a lot of good, if applied to alang1216.
No.The Bible is already banned.
Thank you for the consistency of your outrage.But, If the Bible promotes adult-child sexual fantasies, then, yes.
Have you not read the Bible?Can you show a passage where that exists.
You are a nut job.Sounds very biblical to me, except it's girls being raped by men.
Is that okay for kids to read about?
There are numerous passages; are you not conversant with this deeply troubling masterwork?Show us a passage or two.
So you too stand for the removal of the Bible from school libraries?we keep seeing LGBTQ books in schools be riddled with examples of perversion and pornography.
Then, when we want to get rid of the filth, the left victimizes that were transphobic?
So they equate the trans movement with perversion and pornography.. it’s quite an admission
Have you not read the Bible?Show a passage where the Bible glorifies or fantasizes about adult-child sexual relations like the Lawn Boy does.