Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 66,995
- 17,031
- 2,190
No no my dishonest little amigo. I have never once argument for censorship. I’ve questioned your statements and facts check things I’m seeing as untrue. I don’t see that letter as censorship. Therefore me being ok with the letter is not me being ok with censorship. To imply it is would be a low IQ argument. Do better than that pleaseYes, you are okay with that. You've been arguing FOR CENSORSHIP for 2 days. Just because you don't see it as censorship doesn't mean it is not. You are not the brightest bulb on the Block
"Shellenberger's new installment centers on Twitter's decision to temporarily block a New York Post story about Hunter Biden just before the 2020 election. This was also the subject of the first Twitter Files thread, from Matt Taibbi."
![]()
The FBI paid Twitter $3.4 million for processing requests
The latest Twitter Files installment shows the FBI paid Twitter millions of dollars to cover the costs of processing the agency's requests. Yikes.reason.com