LIVE: Obama giving a splendid lecture/scolding to American peasants on guns! BANNED private sales!

FACT SHEET: New Executive Actions to Reduce Gun Violence and Make Our Communities Safer

With another executive action hahaha what a joke. Look out criminals you'll no longer be able to buy a gun. Hahaha!

What's gained by making it easy for criminals to buy guns? What do you gain personally, or shouldn't I ask?








Last time I checked criminals don't DO background checks. Uhhh, that's one of the things that makes them "criminals" They don't follow laws. Do you understand?



Criminals don't obey laws. That's what makes them criminals you fucking retard.



This logic basically says we should have no laws because there will be people who break them .


No, we have laws and punish people who do break them. If you are not legally allowed to own a firearm, you face a criminal charge(s) and you probably will end up in jail or prison.
 
Firearms used in most crimes are one of two things - stolen or black market south of the border.
Progressives are stupid as dirt...
And don't forget... "South-of-the Border" guns were possibly furnished by Holder and Obozo, through "Fast and Furious"...

So the Democrats arm criminals and terrorists like ISIS, then want to DISARM law- abiding citizens...

Can't anyone with half a brain see a problem with this???
 
Obama is not going to keep us safe. We aren't safe. We have gun homicide rates that are through the roof, right up there with place like Uruguay or Somalia. Obama is going to try and make us safer. It will help, although nobody knows how much. If it saves the lives of just a few dozen of the thousands who die from guns each year, it is probably a plus.

I can't stand the sound of his voice anymore so I didn't listen. But conservative talk shows played some parts.

Obama said just what you wrote. We need to do something, anything to stop gun violence, but no law will stop it all.

And there you have it, by DumBama's own words, liberal philosophy.

Whenever there is a problem, liberal politicians feel they need to solve the problem. It doesn't matter if what they do will work, just do something......anything. Forget about the results.
 
The only people who live in a constant state of fear are those whose solution to everything is "MOAR GUNZ!!!111!"

People's Exhibit A: The guy whose post follows this one.
 
Your right lass .

We should have guns available out of vending machines for anyone to buy! Is that what you want ?

No but an American should not have to register a gun, that's the first step in confiscation


Hold up. President Obama has not said anything about a registry.



Yet.
Hold up, if people have to register and pass an application to purchase a gun, does that not create a registry by default?

What's wrong with a registry? What is on your agenda that a registry might threaten?

It's your agenda that people need to worry about. hey, why don't we make it legal for the cops to search your house without a warrant? Think of all the illegal activities they could uncover. you have nothing to worry about if you have nothing to hide, right?
 
FACT SHEET: New Executive Actions to Reduce Gun Violence and Make Our Communities Safer

With another executive action hahaha what a joke. Look out criminals you'll no longer be able to buy a gun. Hahaha!

What's gained by making it easy for criminals to buy guns? What do you gain personally, or shouldn't I ask?








Last time I checked criminals don't DO background checks. Uhhh, that's one of the things that makes them "criminals" They don't follow laws. Do you understand?



Criminals don't obey laws. That's what makes them criminals you fucking retard.



This logic basically says we should have no laws because there will be people who break them .


No, we have laws and punish people who do break them. If you are not legally allowed to own a firearm, you face a criminal charge(s) and you probably will end up in jail or prison.

What about the imagration laws
 
No but an American should not have to register a gun, that's the first step in confiscation


Hold up. President Obama has not said anything about a registry.



Yet.
Hold up, if people have to register and pass an application to purchase a gun, does that not create a registry by default?

What's wrong with a registry? What is on your agenda that a registry might threaten?
registry allows for confiscation.
t

The 2nd Amendment doesn't. Pull your paranoid head out of your paranoid ass.

it doesn't allow for registration either, numskull.
 
Last time I checked criminals don't DO background checks. Uhhh, that's one of the things that makes them "criminals" They don't follow laws. Do you understand?



Criminals don't obey laws. That's what makes them criminals you fucking retard.



This logic basically says we should have no laws because there will be people who break them .


Exactly. Let's repeal drunk driving laws because, hey, people will still drive drunk.

Thats the liberals claim when it comes to marijuana. People are going to do it whether its legal or not, so lets make it legal.
Difference?


Pot is not murdering thousands of people a year .


Neither are law abiding gun owners.
 
Hold up. President Obama has not said anything about a registry.



Yet.
Hold up, if people have to register and pass an application to purchase a gun, does that not create a registry by default?

What's wrong with a registry? What is on your agenda that a registry might threaten?
registry allows for confiscation.
t

The 2nd Amendment doesn't. Pull your paranoid head out of your paranoid ass.

it doesn't allow for registration either, numskull.

They keep missing that "shall not be infringed..."
 
The Online Loophole
Obama: “A violent felon can buy the exact same weapon over the internet with no background check, no questions asked.”
Truth: There is no online loophole. Exactly as with the gun show, what happens is that a person might privately sell something. Let’s say you own a gun. You have a friend on Facebook who wants to buy a gun. You sell your friend the gun. Because you are not a retailer, you do not have to be licensed as a dealer, and are not required to conduct a background check. That’s it. Otherwise, online sales are already covered. Retailers that sell guns and have an online presence where you can buy them are licensed and therefore, the sales are legal and there is a background check on the buyer. And you simply can’t sell a gun over the internet and ship it over state liunes without restriction or background check even if it is a private sale. That’s right. Even private online sales cannot transfer the weapon without a check. There’s no loophole.
you gotta just love the Right. They call Obama a liar over the private sale over the internet loophole by denying there is one, and then state the loophole exactly. Then they divert by going on about "retailers" even though Obama said nothing about retailers regarding the online loophole, nor did Obama say anything about shipping the gun over state lines.

As always, the Right change what was actually said to call others liars.
 
Firearms used in most crimes are one of two things - stolen or black market south of the border.
Progressives are stupid as dirt...
And don't forget... "South-of-the Border" guns were possibly furnished by Holder and Obozo, through "Fast and Furious"...

So the Democrats arm criminals and terrorists like ISIS, then want to DISARM law- abiding citizens...

Can't anyone with half a brain see a problem with this???

Democrats have been complaining for years about how our prisons are so full of drug sellers and users. Now DumBama wants to create more laws that might put more people in jail for crimes less violent than selling drugs.

Maybe he knows this, that's why he let thousands of drug criminals back out into our streets; because he knows we are going to need the room for people that sell guns outside of his new guidelines.
 
Hold up, if people have to register and pass an application to purchase a gun, does that not create a registry by default?

What's wrong with a registry? What is on your agenda that a registry might threaten?
registry allows for confiscation.
t

The 2nd Amendment doesn't. Pull your paranoid head out of your paranoid ass.

it doesn't allow for registration either, numskull.

They keep missing that "shall not be infringed..."

They don't "miss" it. They deliberately ignore it.
 
In the thread already started about this, you'll find Trump referred to himself twice as often in half the time.
 
my local gun shop has a help wanted sign in the window. Good work Obama gun sale jobs on the increase!
 
Firearms used in most crimes are one of two things - stolen or black market south of the border.
Progressives are stupid as dirt...
And don't forget... "South-of-the Border" guns were possibly furnished by Holder and Obozo, through "Fast and Furious"...

So the Democrats arm criminals and terrorists like ISIS, then want to DISARM law- abiding citizens...

Can't anyone with half a brain see a problem with this???

Democrats have been complaining for years about how our prisons are so full of drug sellers and users. Now DumBama wants to create more laws that might put more people in jail for crimes less violent than selling drugs.

Maybe he knows this, that's why he let thousands of drug criminals back out into our streets; because he knows we are going to need the room for people that sell guns outside of his new guidelines.
And they overlook the fact that a large number of the murders are committed by drug users and dealers...

The very people Obozo wants to release, and give access to ILLEGAL guns again!!!
 
Hold up, if people have to register and pass an application to purchase a gun, does that not create a registry by default?

What's wrong with a registry? What is on your agenda that a registry might threaten?
registry allows for confiscation.
t

The 2nd Amendment doesn't. Pull your paranoid head out of your paranoid ass.

it doesn't allow for registration either, numskull.

They keep missing that "shall not be infringed..."

What about the rest ? "Well regulated"
 
Criminals don't obey laws. That's what makes them criminals you fucking retard.


This logic basically says we should have no laws because there will be people who break them .

Exactly. Let's repeal drunk driving laws because, hey, people will still drive drunk.
Thats the liberals claim when it comes to marijuana. People are going to do it whether its legal or not, so lets make it legal.
Difference?

Pot is not murdering thousands of people a year .

Neither are law abiding gun owners.

And this affects them how ? Law abiding gun buyers have nothing to worry about .
 

Forum List

Back
Top