Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We should all listen to her wise counsel on this subject:
No surprise Trump doesn't want you to see the J6 Committee evidence," Cheney wrote
I dont have the evidence. The prosecutor has that.Hey look, another communist dodging a simple question.
Smith won't touch anything coming out of the J6 TV show......Nope.
Smith is a veteran prosecutor.
You can be sure he has more than that to connect the dots that make his point.
As I said before Huchinson's sworn testimony is just what we've seen.
There is more.
Are you living under a rock or something so you haven't heard that the J6 Committee long ago passed it's evidence file to Jack Smith along with it's recommendations for indictments.Smith won't touch anything coming out of the J6 TV show......
If Smith wants to do anything with the 'evidence'...he would depose the person from the J6 TV charade, rather than rely on 'evidence' from the fiasco.Are you living under a rock or something so you haven't heard that the J6 Committee long ago passed it's evidence file to Jack Smith along with it's recommendations for indictments.
Are you just kidding....or did you seriously not know that?
She had a role. She was not alone. There was no consipracy to hide r destroy anything like evidence. facts suck for those who try so desperately to believe otherwise.Why didn’t Liz just make it public when she was chair of the committee? All of it
Liking her for being a profile-in-courage, does not equate to loving her.The left hates Dick Cheney but loves his daughter.
Your only problem is the house has said they haven't got all the records they demanded be preserved.She had a role. She was not alone. There was no consipracy to hide r destroy anything like evidence. facts suck for those who try so desperately to believe otherwise.
Yeah, you're right....her own constituents saw he same qualities on her re election.Liking her for being a profile-in-courage, does not equate to loving her.
really? You mean all of the data?Your only problem is the house has said they haven't got all the records they demanded be preserved.
Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.) chairman of the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight told Fox News on Tuesday that the House Jan. 6 select committee did not adequately preserve documents, data and video depositions — including communications it had with President Biden's administration — and failed to provide
the House Jan. 6 select committee did not adequately preserve documents, data and video depositions — including communications it had with President Biden's administration
hey troll, fuck offYeah, you're right....her own constituents saw he same qualities on her re election.
Because Facts MAtter:Your only problem is the house has said they haven't got all the records they demanded be preserved.
www.latimes.com
You never heard of house rules?What law or rule have they broken? Another crazed accusation that will fizzle out
Thanks for the kind words.hey troll, fuck off
That is not accurate. Much of the committee’s work was made public through an 845-page, eight-chapter report, several televised hearings and about 180 released transcripts and interviews.
Had a role? What? Why didn’t she release all the evidence then?She had a role. She was not alone. There was no consipracy to hide r destroy anything like evidence. facts suck for those who try so desperately to believe otherwise.
You are repeating fake news programmed talking points.Had a role? What? Why didn’t she release all the evidence then?
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?Had a role? What? Why didn’t she release all the evidence then?
Why? They weren’t all the Committee. She’s the one saying she hadn’t made it all public…I am merely asking whyWHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
This all the evidence bullshit is hilarious
Call Durham and Rudy and Sidney Powell
