Liz Cheney: We're Not Going To Let Trump Testify In Public To The January 6 Committee

She did. But McCarthy still boycotted it. He could have replaced the two Pelosi rejected. Instead, he pulled all 5 seats and refused to place any Republicans on that committee.
Whats the point if saying "OK, well let you pick your own members.

McCarthy "Jordan and Banks"

Pelosi "!!! Well...not THOSE two members!!"

Like, why didn't pelosi just give McCarthy a list of her own "approved" republicans and he could pick from that. That's what this really amounts to.
 
Whats the point if saying "OK, well let you pick your own members.

McCarthy "Jordan and Banks"

Pelosi "!!! Well...not THOSE two members!!"

Like, why didn't pelosi just give McCarthy a list of her own "approved" republicans and he could pick from that. That's what this really amounts to.

Those two members voted to not certify Biden as the winner of the election he won. She was right to not let them on that committee. He could have named two others who didn't vote that way and there would have been no political majority on that committee.

A pity that McCarthy folded.
 
Learn to speak English, Dumbfuck.
Hey, look everyone Fawnboi found a typo.

Let's all give him a golf clap.

1666736505939.png
 
Uh, no, the original proposal was to have 5 Democrats and 5 Republicans. And Republicans would have had the same subpoena power as Democrats.
But who would have had the final say in decisions? You know at 5-5, there would be disagreements, and you know the dems wouldn't give up control over something like this. The chair would have been a democrat and they would have had the final say on all decisions.

But you're right, it probably would have been better. If only pelosi wasn't trying to steer who McCarthy picked.
 
Those two members voted to not certify Biden as the winner of the election he won. She was right to not let them on that committee. He could have named two others who didn't vote that way and there would have been no political majority on that committee.

A pity that McCarthy folded.
All of the democrats voted to impeach Trump twice. What's your point? Are you trying to say that the repubs would have been biased? No more than the dems are.
 
Of course it does. If she was 3, not a problem. If she was 13, huge problem.
Uhh...that makes no difference. You don't get naked and take showers with your own kids. If he needed to bath his child, he could have done that separately, not at the same time as he's standing there with his schlong hanging out.


Wow....
 
But who would have had the final say in decisions? You know at 5-5, there would be disagreements, and you know the dems wouldn't give up control over something like this. The chair would have been a democrat and they would have had the final say on all decisions.

But you're right, it probably would have been better. If only pelosi wasn't trying to steer who McCarthy picked.

Again, false. The original proposal was for the chair (Democrat) and vice chair (Republican) to agree on disputes to settle them; or on a majority vote of the committee.
 
All of the democrats voted to impeach Trump twice. What's your point? Are you trying to say that the repubs would have been biased? No more than the dems are.

No, not saying that. Voting to impeach in the House was as politically biased as was voting to not impeach. Neither of which should have precluded any House member from being on that committee. But pushing to prevent the duly elected president from becoming president was obscene and should have prevented them from being on it.
 
Uhh...that makes no difference. You don't get naked and take showers with your own kids. If he needed to bath his child, he could have done that separately, not at the same time as he's standing there with his schlong hanging out.


Wow....

Who said Biden was naked? What is with you freaks and your fetish fantasies??
 
The
Again, false. The original proposal was for the chair (Democrat) and vice chair (Republican) to agree on disputes to settle them; or on a majority vote of the committee.
Chair (democrat)

Vice chair (republican)

There's that...

Also, at 5-5, you know that they were bound to run into a LOT of disputes, many that neither side would have budged on. So, how do you think they would have resolved those? My guess, that chair has the final say.

You are suggesting that both sides would have had equal power? The dems would not have been able to overrule the repubs on anything? You think, on THIS investigation, thr dems would give up control?
 
The

Chair (democrat)

Vice chair (republican)

There's that...

Also, at 5-5, you know that they were bound to run into a LOT of disputes, many that neither side would have budged on. So, how do you think they would have resolved those? My guess, that chair has the final say.

You are suggesting that both sides would have had equal power? The dems would not have been able to overrule the repubs on anything? You think, on THIS investigation, thr dems would give up control?

You guess wrong. In an effort to gain Republican collaboration. Pelosi attempted to assemble a completely bipartisan commission.

One can only guess why Republicans refused to investigate January 6th.
 
No, not saying that. Voting to impeach in the House was as politically biased as was voting to not impeach. Neither of which should have precluded any House member from being on that committee. But pushing to prevent the duly elected president from becoming president was obscene and should have prevented them from being on it.
Is voting not to certify illegal? Or against the rules? Have dems never voted to not certify a repub? I know they objected to Trump and tried to stall the electoral count, and I think they tried to block florida electoral votes for Bush.
 

Forum List

Back
Top