Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If God knows all, why would he only make 2 people? Wouldnt he know incest causes defects? Was his goal a bunch of physical deformities and retards?I know after Adam and Eve left the garden that there were all of sudden thousands of people everywhere.Ice ages last for thousands of years. The last one lasted like 10K years..No one wants to discuss pangea? The one thing I know in regards to history is there is NO suggestion that Egyptians walked around South America. Unless we want to talk about the Mayan temples.
Nothing suggests that the continents were together as one during the time of the pharaohs and Moses. Is there? Do we think the continents were one during that time?
How long do continents or how long did it take pangea to separate out into the 5 distinct continents that we know today?
Was there an ice age? Nothing like that at all? When was the ice age? No writings about that. That was a pretty major time in earths history. Unless we are saying that there was no ice age.
There is A LOT and I mean A LOT of evidence that there was a major ice age period. How long ago was that and how long did that last? 100 years?
How last do continents drift?
Just curious. Do we have factual data in regards to that?
Also, they were "kings" not pharaohs. I know some historical data(biblical interpretations) calls them that, but the egyptians didnt. Alot of people dont know that.
That also has led to me to question whether the bible was even talking about Egypt in Exodus or not..
That is a lot of kids that she had.
Well, the hundreds of billions comment is you being sarcastic. I get that.There are two possibilities.I have read about marine fossils found on MT Everest.I'm going fossil hunting next week. I will likely find dozens of intact fossils.I didnt think we had any. We have "sue" which is like 80 or 85% complete. The others are like 50 and 60%. Maybe i am wrong?So we just happen to find thousands of creatures immediately covered by mud? Pffft.
You also have to understand that any particular species, T-Rex say, roamed the earth for tens of thousands of years. That's a lot of dead T-Rexes. Yet what do we have, like six complete skeletons?
How is that hard to believe?
Not sure if that is an actual example from Everest, but I believe there are ones like that.
If it is true that fossils of MARINE ANIMALS are on Everest, which is around 30K feet high, how long did the Himalayas take to rise so high out of sea level?
Just curious.
It took hundreds of billions of years for the continents to press it up.
Or during the flood the earth was reformed.
Why aren't you asking that question to those who think life began in a pond?If God knows all, why would he only make 2 people? Wouldnt he know incest causes defects? Was his goal a bunch of physical deformities and retards?I know after Adam and Eve left the garden that there were all of sudden thousands of people everywhere.Ice ages last for thousands of years. The last one lasted like 10K years..No one wants to discuss pangea? The one thing I know in regards to history is there is NO suggestion that Egyptians walked around South America. Unless we want to talk about the Mayan temples.
Nothing suggests that the continents were together as one during the time of the pharaohs and Moses. Is there? Do we think the continents were one during that time?
How long do continents or how long did it take pangea to separate out into the 5 distinct continents that we know today?
Was there an ice age? Nothing like that at all? When was the ice age? No writings about that. That was a pretty major time in earths history. Unless we are saying that there was no ice age.
There is A LOT and I mean A LOT of evidence that there was a major ice age period. How long ago was that and how long did that last? 100 years?
How last do continents drift?
Just curious. Do we have factual data in regards to that?
Also, they were "kings" not pharaohs. I know some historical data(biblical interpretations) calls them that, but the egyptians didnt. Alot of people dont know that.
That also has led to me to question whether the bible was even talking about Egypt in Exodus or not..
That is a lot of kids that she had.
And i believe you are correct. Wasnt Cain scared of being killed when he got kicked out of Eden?
Maybe that story was just a metaphor? (lol)
That is a very good point weather!Why aren't you asking that question to those who think life began in a pond?If God knows all, why would he only make 2 people? Wouldnt he know incest causes defects? Was his goal a bunch of physical deformities and retards?I know after Adam and Eve left the garden that there were all of sudden thousands of people everywhere.Ice ages last for thousands of years. The last one lasted like 10K years..No one wants to discuss pangea? The one thing I know in regards to history is there is NO suggestion that Egyptians walked around South America. Unless we want to talk about the Mayan temples.
Nothing suggests that the continents were together as one during the time of the pharaohs and Moses. Is there? Do we think the continents were one during that time?
How long do continents or how long did it take pangea to separate out into the 5 distinct continents that we know today?
Was there an ice age? Nothing like that at all? When was the ice age? No writings about that. That was a pretty major time in earths history. Unless we are saying that there was no ice age.
There is A LOT and I mean A LOT of evidence that there was a major ice age period. How long ago was that and how long did that last? 100 years?
How last do continents drift?
Just curious. Do we have factual data in regards to that?
Also, they were "kings" not pharaohs. I know some historical data(biblical interpretations) calls them that, but the egyptians didnt. Alot of people dont know that.
That also has led to me to question whether the bible was even talking about Egypt in Exodus or not..
That is a lot of kids that she had.
And i believe you are correct. Wasnt Cain scared of being killed when he got kicked out of Eden?
Maybe that story was just a metaphor? (lol)
I thought if there was a flood there would be evidence of creeks and rivers everywhere. I think there is wind erosion too. Along with many other things.More signs of a global flood are all around us. Top photo can be passed off as layering over millions of years. It was created in a few weeks by Mt St Helens.
Bottom photo shows a typical layering. One thing you will never find in layering like this is evidence of water flow. If that took millions of years to form, where are the creeks and rivers?
View attachment 142940 View attachment 142941
I'm going fossil hunting next week. I will likely find dozens of intact fossils.I didnt think we had any. We have "sue" which is like 80 or 85% complete. The others are like 50 and 60%. Maybe i am wrong?So we just happen to find thousands of creatures immediately covered by mud? Pffft.One other aspect they always conveniently overlook: All of the intact fossil finds. Put a carcass out in a field. A year later you will not find anything there. Bones will be scattered all over from the animals devouring it. An intact fossil requires immediate burial in mud. You know, something like a big flood would do.
Or a tar pit, or a flash flood, or a mass extinction. Aside from those facts you must understand that there were thousands of species of dinosaurs at any given time and perhaps millions of each species. They all die. Yet we don't have the bones from every one of them. That's because 99.9999% of the time, what you described actually did happen.
You also have to understand that any particular species, T-Rex say, roamed the earth for tens of thousands of years. That's a lot of dead T-Rexes. Yet what do we have, like six complete skeletons?
How is that hard to believe?
I have read about marine fossils found on MT Everest.I'm going fossil hunting next week. I will likely find dozens of intact fossils.I didnt think we had any. We have "sue" which is like 80 or 85% complete. The others are like 50 and 60%. Maybe i am wrong?So we just happen to find thousands of creatures immediately covered by mud? Pffft.Or a tar pit, or a flash flood, or a mass extinction. Aside from those facts you must understand that there were thousands of species of dinosaurs at any given time and perhaps millions of each species. They all die. Yet we don't have the bones from every one of them. That's because 99.9999% of the time, what you described actually did happen.
You also have to understand that any particular species, T-Rex say, roamed the earth for tens of thousands of years. That's a lot of dead T-Rexes. Yet what do we have, like six complete skeletons?
How is that hard to believe?
Not sure if that is an actual example from Everest, but I believe there are ones like that.
If it is true that fossils of MARINE ANIMALS are on Everest, which is around 30K feet high, how long did the Himalayas take to rise so high out of sea level?
Just curious.
The virus is not that complicated. Plus a change in shape does not turn a harmless-to-humans virus into a man-killer, or change its transmission ability.The DNA in a virus says it can change shape, the DNA is not changing.Any mutation in DNA will have an impact. A negative impact. There is no DNA code that is not programed to do something. You take that away, and things go badly for that living thing.In order for DNA to reproduce there are bio machines that must work perfectly.
View attachment 142935
How did all of these machines evolve at the same time?
At no point in science can you find where something becomes more complex over time. Everything degrades. Except in evolution. Supposedly new code is inserted into the DNA strand out of no where and this code works perfectly. Try making a few random changes to the code in your Windows 10 software and tell us how improved it is. And life is much more complex than Windows 10.
There is a flaw in your logic. Here it is:
"Supposedly new code is inserted into the DNA strand out of no where and this code works perfectly"
99.99999% of the time mutations in the DNA code do absolutely nothing. Sometimes they can kill and sometimes they are beneficial. The more often DNA is exchanged(sexual reproduction) the more you roll that DNA dice. That's why viruses, which reproduce daily, can evolve almost immediately whereas more complex organisms like us can take millennia.
A virus is not changing it's DNA, it merely changes shape to prevent white blood cells from clinging to it.
That just simply isn't true.
What do you think determines the shape of the virus? That's right, it's DNA.
I didnt think we had any. We have "sue" which is like 80 or 85% complete. The others are like 50 and 60%. Maybe i am wrong?So we just happen to find thousands of creatures immediately covered by mud? Pffft.One other aspect they always conveniently overlook: All of the intact fossil finds. Put a carcass out in a field. A year later you will not find anything there. Bones will be scattered all over from the animals devouring it. An intact fossil requires immediate burial in mud. You know, something like a big flood would do.
Or a tar pit, or a flash flood, or a mass extinction. Aside from those facts you must understand that there were thousands of species of dinosaurs at any given time and perhaps millions of each species. They all die. Yet we don't have the bones from every one of them. That's because 99.9999% of the time, what you described actually did happen.
You also have to understand that any particular species, T-Rex say, roamed the earth for tens of thousands of years. That's a lot of dead T-Rexes. Yet what do we have, like six complete skeletons?
How is that hard to believe?
I'm referring to the layering. We find no evidence of creeks or rivers because that layering happened rapidly.I thought if there was a flood there would be evidence of creeks and rivers everywhere. I think there is wind erosion too. Along with many other things.More signs of a global flood are all around us. Top photo can be passed off as layering over millions of years. It was created in a few weeks by Mt St Helens.
Bottom photo shows a typical layering. One thing you will never find in layering like this is evidence of water flow. If that took millions of years to form, where are the creeks and rivers?
View attachment 142940 View attachment 142941
Then as sediment piles up and pressure builds they turn into rock over time?
I am guessing. I am not a geologist. I have a feeling though that even if a geologist told us, some people would not believe them.
Yes, I will find dozens of fossilized fish and other sea creatures. Which I can only find because they were rapidly buried in mud.I'm going fossil hunting next week. I will likely find dozens of intact fossils.I didnt think we had any. We have "sue" which is like 80 or 85% complete. The others are like 50 and 60%. Maybe i am wrong?So we just happen to find thousands of creatures immediately covered by mud? Pffft.Or a tar pit, or a flash flood, or a mass extinction. Aside from those facts you must understand that there were thousands of species of dinosaurs at any given time and perhaps millions of each species. They all die. Yet we don't have the bones from every one of them. That's because 99.9999% of the time, what you described actually did happen.
You also have to understand that any particular species, T-Rex say, roamed the earth for tens of thousands of years. That's a lot of dead T-Rexes. Yet what do we have, like six complete skeletons?
How is that hard to believe?
Dozens of full skeletons? No, you won't. Even in your scenario, many animals that consume flesh shit out the bones. If you were to find dozens of full skeletons, then you might have a valid argument, but you would also be famous.
No one wants to discuss pangea? The one thing I know in regards to history is there is NO suggestion that Egyptians walked around South America. Unless we want to talk about the Mayan temples.
Nothing suggests that the continents were together as one during the time of the pharaohs and Moses. Is there? Do we think the continents were one during that time?
How long do continents or how long did it take pangea to separate out into the 5 distinct continents that we know today?
Was there an ice age? Nothing like that at all? When was the ice age? No writings about that. That was a pretty major time in earths history. Unless we are saying that there was no ice age.
There is A LOT and I mean A LOT of evidence that there was a major ice age period. How long ago was that and how long did that last? 100 years?
How fast do continents drift?
Just curious. Do we have factual data in regards to that?
Yeah, but why only six or T rexes? My fundementalist friend is convinced they were killed in the flood.Yes, I will find dozens of fossilized fish and other sea creatures. Which I can only find because they were rapidly buried in mud.I'm going fossil hunting next week. I will likely find dozens of intact fossils.I didnt think we had any. We have "sue" which is like 80 or 85% complete. The others are like 50 and 60%. Maybe i am wrong?So we just happen to find thousands of creatures immediately covered by mud? Pffft.
You also have to understand that any particular species, T-Rex say, roamed the earth for tens of thousands of years. That's a lot of dead T-Rexes. Yet what do we have, like six complete skeletons?
How is that hard to believe?
Dozens of full skeletons? No, you won't. Even in your scenario, many animals that consume flesh shit out the bones. If you were to find dozens of full skeletons, then you might have a valid argument, but you would also be famous.
You're the one who claims viruses proves DNA mutates. Now you don't want to talk about it now that you see there is no mutation of DNA? Cripes.The virus is not that complicated. Plus a change in shape does not turn a harmless-to-humans virus into a man-killer, or change its transmission ability.The DNA in a virus says it can change shape, the DNA is not changing.Any mutation in DNA will have an impact. A negative impact. There is no DNA code that is not programed to do something. You take that away, and things go badly for that living thing.In order for DNA to reproduce there are bio machines that must work perfectly.
View attachment 142935
How did all of these machines evolve at the same time?
At no point in science can you find where something becomes more complex over time. Everything degrades. Except in evolution. Supposedly new code is inserted into the DNA strand out of no where and this code works perfectly. Try making a few random changes to the code in your Windows 10 software and tell us how improved it is. And life is much more complex than Windows 10.
There is a flaw in your logic. Here it is:
"Supposedly new code is inserted into the DNA strand out of no where and this code works perfectly"
99.99999% of the time mutations in the DNA code do absolutely nothing. Sometimes they can kill and sometimes they are beneficial. The more often DNA is exchanged(sexual reproduction) the more you roll that DNA dice. That's why viruses, which reproduce daily, can evolve almost immediately whereas more complex organisms like us can take millennia.
A virus is not changing it's DNA, it merely changes shape to prevent white blood cells from clinging to it.
That just simply isn't true.
What do you think determines the shape of the virus? That's right, it's DNA.
We are a bit off the track here. The point is that the more often an organism reproduces, the more frequently mutations happen.
Yes, I will find dozens of fossilized fish and other sea creatures. Which I can only find because they were rapidly buried in mud.I'm going fossil hunting next week. I will likely find dozens of intact fossils.I didnt think we had any. We have "sue" which is like 80 or 85% complete. The others are like 50 and 60%. Maybe i am wrong?So we just happen to find thousands of creatures immediately covered by mud? Pffft.
You also have to understand that any particular species, T-Rex say, roamed the earth for tens of thousands of years. That's a lot of dead T-Rexes. Yet what do we have, like six complete skeletons?
How is that hard to believe?
Dozens of full skeletons? No, you won't. Even in your scenario, many animals that consume flesh shit out the bones. If you were to find dozens of full skeletons, then you might have a valid argument, but you would also be famous.
Yeah, but why only six or T rexes? My fundementalist friend is convinced they were killed in the flood.Yes, I will find dozens of fossilized fish and other sea creatures. Which I can only find because they were rapidly buried in mud.I'm going fossil hunting next week. I will likely find dozens of intact fossils.I didnt think we had any. We have "sue" which is like 80 or 85% complete. The others are like 50 and 60%. Maybe i am wrong?You also have to understand that any particular species, T-Rex say, roamed the earth for tens of thousands of years. That's a lot of dead T-Rexes. Yet what do we have, like six complete skeletons?
How is that hard to believe?
Dozens of full skeletons? No, you won't. Even in your scenario, many animals that consume flesh shit out the bones. If you were to find dozens of full skeletons, then you might have a valid argument, but you would also be famous.
If humans have existed for 500,000 years why only a dozen finds?Yeah, but why only six or T rexes? My fundementalist friend is convinced they were killed in the flood.Yes, I will find dozens of fossilized fish and other sea creatures. Which I can only find because they were rapidly buried in mud.I'm going fossil hunting next week. I will likely find dozens of intact fossils.I didnt think we had any. We have "sue" which is like 80 or 85% complete. The others are like 50 and 60%. Maybe i am wrong?You also have to understand that any particular species, T-Rex say, roamed the earth for tens of thousands of years. That's a lot of dead T-Rexes. Yet what do we have, like six complete skeletons?
How is that hard to believe?
Dozens of full skeletons? No, you won't. Even in your scenario, many animals that consume flesh shit out the bones. If you were to find dozens of full skeletons, then you might have a valid argument, but you would also be famous.
How long have we been looking? How long have we been smart enough to understand what they were?If humans have existed for 500,000 years why only a dozen finds?Yeah, but why only six or T rexes? My fundementalist friend is convinced they were killed in the flood.Yes, I will find dozens of fossilized fish and other sea creatures. Which I can only find because they were rapidly buried in mud.I'm going fossil hunting next week. I will likely find dozens of intact fossils.I didnt think we had any. We have "sue" which is like 80 or 85% complete. The others are like 50 and 60%. Maybe i am wrong?
Dozens of full skeletons? No, you won't. Even in your scenario, many animals that consume flesh shit out the bones. If you were to find dozens of full skeletons, then you might have a valid argument, but you would also be famous.
