Love Child? Never meant to be...

shoot, Jimmy Carter at least, just lusted in his heart....and did not act on it.....God bless him, for recognizing that the Bible says, even THAT is just as sinful...but it shows he was seeking forgiveness and repentance for those thoughts....he was confessing them imo, only without the confessional booth and priest.
Truman, Roosevelt, Churchill, Bill Clinton, LBJ, JFK and more were good Presidents/leaders but had moral issues.

Ronald Reagan seemed to be one of the few moral men who was also a good leader. I guess Hollywood made him learn to 'trust but vverify'.

He ran around with Nancy behind his wife's back for years.
 
why pay the guy $30k though? if there was not a smidgen chance of it being true.... that's the puzzling part....?

the rich often would rather buy the silence of their accusers than go to court and pay the lawyers.
but it was the National enquirer buying it, NOT the rich person, Trump....unless in the search records they find that cohen had shows he is the one who repaid the National enquirer?

and the trump team put out on the doorman that he was known liar that makes things up....

if that were the case, and he is known to be a fabricator, and if there was no chance in being true, why pay him the 30k?

One thing rich people like Trump love, is their money....they don't pass it on to strangers for nothing....imo.
Other than the doorman's word which the NE has denied, is there any proof he was paid anything?
 
why pay the guy $30k though? if there was not a smidgen chance of it being true.... that's the puzzling part....?

the rich often would rather buy the silence of their accusers than go to court and pay the lawyers.
but it was the National enquirer buying it, NOT the rich person, Trump....unless in the search records they find that cohen had shows he is the one who repaid the National enquirer?

and the trump team put out on the doorman that he was known liar that makes things up....

if that were the case, and he is known to be a fabricator, and if there was no chance in being true, why pay him the 30k?

One thing rich people like Trump love, is their money....they don't pass it on to strangers for nothing....imo.
Other than the doorman's word which the NE has denied, is there any proof he was paid anything?
the N/E have NOT denied it Tipsy...




In late 2015, Dino Sajudin, a former doorman at Trump Tower, told a reporter for American Media Inc. (or AMI for short, which publishes the National Enquirer among other gossip outlets) that Donald Trump had possibly fathered a child out of wedlock with an ex-employee in the late 1980s. He passed a lie detector test, AMI paid him $30,000 for the exclusive rights to his account, and then the company, whose president is good friends with President Trump, buried it.

Sajudin’s allegation of a $30,000 payoff to kill the story, reported first by the New Yorker’s Ronan Farrow on Thursday, April 12, has since been corroborated in whole or in part by the Associated Press and the Washington Post. The Post’s Carol Leonnig spoke to Sajudin, who stood by his story and told her it “had to come out.”

The Donald Trump "love child" payoff scandal, explained

and this

National Enquirer publisher paid doorman $30K to keep quiet about Trump rumor: reports

and this

Tabloid paid doorman $30,000 to squash Trump baby rumor

and this

Trump Tower doorman: They told me not to talk about housekeeper who allegedly had Trump's child

Trump doorman says National Enquirer paid for 'love child' story
 
yheir
why pay the guy $30k though? if there was not a smidgen chance of it being true.... that's the puzzling part....?

the rich often would rather buy the silence of their accusers than go to court and pay the lawyers.
but it was the National enquirer buying it, NOT the rich person, Trump....unless in the search records they find that cohen had shows he is the one who repaid the National enquirer?

and the trump team put out on the doorman that he was known liar that makes things up....

if that were the case, and he is known to be a fabricator, and if there was no chance in being true, why pay him the 30k?

One thing rich people like Trump love, is their money....they don't pass it on to strangers for nothing....imo.
Other than the doorman's word which the NE has denied, is there any proof he was paid anything?
the N/E have NOT denied it Tipsy...




In late 2015, Dino Sajudin, a former doorman at Trump Tower, told a reporter for American Media Inc. (or AMI for short, which publishes the National Enquirer among other gossip outlets) that Donald Trump had possibly fathered a child out of wedlock with an ex-employee in the late 1980s. He passed a lie detector test, AMI paid him $30,000 for the exclusive rights to his account, and then the company, whose president is good friends with President Trump, buried it.

Sajudin’s allegation of a $30,000 payoff to kill the story, reported first by the New Yorker’s Ronan Farrow on Thursday, April 12, has since been corroborated in whole or in part by the Associated Press and the Washington Post. The Post’s Carol Leonnig spoke to Sajudin, who stood by his story and told her it “had to come out.”

The Donald Trump "love child" payoff scandal, explained

and this

National Enquirer publisher paid doorman $30K to keep quiet about Trump rumor: reports

and this

Tabloid paid doorman $30,000 to squash Trump baby rumor

and this

Trump Tower doorman: They told me not to talk about housekeeper who allegedly had Trump's child

Trump doorman says National Enquirer paid for 'love child' story

The same person saying the same thing to several different outlets is the same thing. The National Enquirer says they never pay for stories until that story is to be published. So yes, they denied paying for the story and the doorman has not a shred of evidence to back up a thing he says except for the wishful thinking of democrats.
 
yheir
why pay the guy $30k though? if there was not a smidgen chance of it being true.... that's the puzzling part....?

the rich often would rather buy the silence of their accusers than go to court and pay the lawyers.
but it was the National enquirer buying it, NOT the rich person, Trump....unless in the search records they find that cohen had shows he is the one who repaid the National enquirer?

and the trump team put out on the doorman that he was known liar that makes things up....

if that were the case, and he is known to be a fabricator, and if there was no chance in being true, why pay him the 30k?

One thing rich people like Trump love, is their money....they don't pass it on to strangers for nothing....imo.
Other than the doorman's word which the NE has denied, is there any proof he was paid anything?
the N/E have NOT denied it Tipsy...




In late 2015, Dino Sajudin, a former doorman at Trump Tower, told a reporter for American Media Inc. (or AMI for short, which publishes the National Enquirer among other gossip outlets) that Donald Trump had possibly fathered a child out of wedlock with an ex-employee in the late 1980s. He passed a lie detector test, AMI paid him $30,000 for the exclusive rights to his account, and then the company, whose president is good friends with President Trump, buried it.

Sajudin’s allegation of a $30,000 payoff to kill the story, reported first by the New Yorker’s Ronan Farrow on Thursday, April 12, has since been corroborated in whole or in part by the Associated Press and the Washington Post. The Post’s Carol Leonnig spoke to Sajudin, who stood by his story and told her it “had to come out.”

The Donald Trump "love child" payoff scandal, explained

and this

National Enquirer publisher paid doorman $30K to keep quiet about Trump rumor: reports

and this

Tabloid paid doorman $30,000 to squash Trump baby rumor

and this

Trump Tower doorman: They told me not to talk about housekeeper who allegedly had Trump's child

Trump doorman says National Enquirer paid for 'love child' story

The same person saying the same thing to several different outlets is the same thing. The National Enquirer says they never pay for stories until that story is to be published. So yes, they denied paying for the story and the doorman has not a shred of evidence to back up a thing he says except for the wishful thinking of democrats.
Please give a link to that national enquirer claim....

Because I read the story, and the National enquirer(AMI) claimed, they never pay for a story they do not believe to be true.....

They NEVER SAID they did not pay for a story unless they are going to PRINT it.....

What do you think "Catch and Kill" is? It's not against the law and it is utilized by the wealthy.

They (AMI-parent company) have done it on numerous occasions for Trump and the Lord only knows, how many others....people like Weinstein, Cosby and any big time politician comes to mind...
 
The very cozy relationship between Donald Trump and the National Enquirer
By Callum Borchers March 28, 2016

[...]
Trump has written several articles for the Enquirer during the campaign, including one that appears to have been recycled from 2011, when the tabloid was cheering the billionaire real estate mogul toward a White House run that he ultimately decided not to make. The contents are a glorious fusion of Trump's bombast and the Enquirer's gratuitous use of exclamation points.
[...]
Earlier this month, the Enquirer endorsed Trump for president. Its list of 10 reasons he is the "only choice for the White House" read like one of the candidate's stump speeches.
[...]
The very cozy relationship between Donald Trump and the National Enquirer

note the date that was written... & that was just recently... trump has fed them stories for decades when he was just a sleazebag with cash ...whoring around NYC.
 
yheir
the rich often would rather buy the silence of their accusers than go to court and pay the lawyers.
but it was the National enquirer buying it, NOT the rich person, Trump....unless in the search records they find that cohen had shows he is the one who repaid the National enquirer?

and the trump team put out on the doorman that he was known liar that makes things up....

if that were the case, and he is known to be a fabricator, and if there was no chance in being true, why pay him the 30k?

One thing rich people like Trump love, is their money....they don't pass it on to strangers for nothing....imo.
Other than the doorman's word which the NE has denied, is there any proof he was paid anything?
the N/E have NOT denied it Tipsy...




In late 2015, Dino Sajudin, a former doorman at Trump Tower, told a reporter for American Media Inc. (or AMI for short, which publishes the National Enquirer among other gossip outlets) that Donald Trump had possibly fathered a child out of wedlock with an ex-employee in the late 1980s. He passed a lie detector test, AMI paid him $30,000 for the exclusive rights to his account, and then the company, whose president is good friends with President Trump, buried it.

Sajudin’s allegation of a $30,000 payoff to kill the story, reported first by the New Yorker’s Ronan Farrow on Thursday, April 12, has since been corroborated in whole or in part by the Associated Press and the Washington Post. The Post’s Carol Leonnig spoke to Sajudin, who stood by his story and told her it “had to come out.”

The Donald Trump "love child" payoff scandal, explained

and this

National Enquirer publisher paid doorman $30K to keep quiet about Trump rumor: reports

and this

Tabloid paid doorman $30,000 to squash Trump baby rumor

and this

Trump Tower doorman: They told me not to talk about housekeeper who allegedly had Trump's child

Trump doorman says National Enquirer paid for 'love child' story

The same person saying the same thing to several different outlets is the same thing. The National Enquirer says they never pay for stories until that story is to be published. So yes, they denied paying for the story and the doorman has not a shred of evidence to back up a thing he says except for the wishful thinking of democrats.
Please give a link to that national enquirer claim....

Because I read the story, and the National enquirer(AMI) claimed, they never pay for a story they do not believe to be true.....

They NEVER SAID they did not pay for a story unless they are going to PRINT it.....

What do you think "Catch and Kill" is? It's not against the law and it is utilized by the wealthy.

They (AMI-parent company) have done it on numerous occasions for Trump and the Lord only knows, how many others....people like Weinstein, Cosby and any big time politician comes to mind...

All the articles and quotes are from leftist news sites that wouldn't print the truth if it bit them on the ankle. I saw it in a interview, but of course that interview would NEVER make it past You Tube censors.
 

Forum List

Back
Top