Maine Governor Wacky Paul LePage Writes ‘Stolen Election’ on Note Certifying Democrat’s Election Win

[basquebromance]

go get em LePage!

Gov Writes 'Stolen Election' on Note Certifying Democrat's Election Win

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Whiney sore losers, the country is overflowing with them.

 

[rightwinger]

What a legacy

 

[Blackrook]

Democrats have been cheating on elections for over a century. You guys get pissed when you're called on it.

 

[depotoo]

What is wacky is ranked choice voting can change who the winner is, even though the other candidate had the most votes.

 

[Centrista]

go get em LePage!

Gov Writes 'Stolen Election' on Note Certifying Democrat's Election Win

 

[BULLDOG]

What is wacky is ranked choice voting can change who the winner is, even though the other candidate had the most votes.

Seems to be a rash of people being elected with fewer votes than their competitor. Hillary had 3 million more than Trump.

 

[depotoo]

What is wacky is ranked choice voting can change who the winner is, even though the other candidate had the most votes.

Seems to be a rash of people being elected with fewer votes than their competitor. Hillary had 3 million more than Trump.

A poor straw man. Electors are used in the Presidential election, as the founders planned for a reason. A local election is much different than one of thousands of square miles.

 

[Centrista]

What is wacky is ranked choice voting can change who the winner is, even though the other candidate had the most votes.

Seems to be a rash of people being elected with fewer votes than their competitor. Hillary had 3 million more than Trump.

A poor straw man. Electors are used in the Presidential election, as the founders planned for a reason. A local election is much different than one of thousands of square miles.

Why isn't the whiner fighting it in court?

 

[depotoo]

He did and lost.
But you tell me how when you throw out the last candidate ranked choice, and then use those votes added to the top candidates, how do you know the intent of the voter of those lower candidates, to be able to then subscribe those votes to the top two candidate choices.

What is wacky is ranked choice voting can change who the winner is, even though the other candidate had the most votes.

Seems to be a rash of people being elected with fewer votes than their competitor. Hillary had 3 million more than Trump.

A poor straw man. Electors are used in the Presidential election, as the founders planned for a reason. A local election is much different than one of thousands of square miles.

Why isn't the whiner fighting it in court?

 

[Corodon]

According to a different report, "Maine’s top state court last year warned that ranked-choice voting conflicts with the state’s constitution, which says the winners of state-level races are whoever gets the most votes, or a plurality."

Meanwhile, the calendar demands certification, so just do it. Don't add doodles.

https://nypost.com/2018/12/29/maine...-election-while-certifying-democrats-victory/

 

[Centrista]

He did and lost.

Thanks.

 

[BULLDOG]

What is wacky is ranked choice voting can change who the winner is, even though the other candidate had the most votes.

Seems to be a rash of people being elected with fewer votes than their competitor. Hillary had 3 million more than Trump.

A poor straw man. Electors are used in the Presidential election, as the founders planned for a reason. A local election is much different than one of thousands of square miles.

Suck it up and quit whining. You lost. Get over it.

 

[BULLDOG]

He did and lost.
But you tell me how when you throw out the last candidate ranked choice, and then use those votes added to the top candidates, how do you know the intent of the voter of those lower candidates, to be able to then subscribe those votes to the top two candidate choices.

What is wacky is ranked choice voting can change who the winner is, even though the other candidate had the most votes.

Seems to be a rash of people being elected with fewer votes than their competitor. Hillary had 3 million more than Trump.

A poor straw man. Electors are used in the Presidential election, as the founders planned for a reason. A local election is much different than one of thousands of square miles.

Why isn't the whiner fighting it in court?

Those rules have been in effect for a long time, haven't they?

 

[Centrista]

According to a different report, "Maine’s top state court last year warned that ranked-choice voting conflicts with the state’s constitution, which says the winners of state-level races are whoever gets the most votes, or a plurality."

Meanwhile, the calendar demands certification, so just do it. Don't add doodles.

https://nypost.com/2018/12/29/maine...-election-while-certifying-democrats-victory/

Let's see what the same court ruled this year instead of what it "warned" last year:
Maine’s top court clears way for ranked-choice voting in June

 

[depotoo]

No, they just started it in 2018.

He did and lost.
But you tell me how when you throw out the last candidate ranked choice, and then use those votes added to the top candidates, how do you know the intent of the voter of those lower candidates, to be able to then subscribe those votes to the top two candidate choices.

What is wacky is ranked choice voting can change who the winner is, even though the other candidate had the most votes.

Seems to be a rash of people being elected with fewer votes than their competitor. Hillary had 3 million more than Trump.

A poor straw man. Electors are used in the Presidential election, as the founders planned for a reason. A local election is much different than one of thousands of square miles.

Why isn't the whiner fighting it in court?

Those rules have been in effect for a long time, haven't they?

 

[BULLDOG]

No, they just started it in 2018.

He did and lost.
But you tell me how when you throw out the last candidate ranked choice, and then use those votes added to the top candidates, how do you know the intent of the voter of those lower candidates, to be able to then subscribe those votes to the top two candidate choices.

Seems to be a rash of people being elected with fewer votes than their competitor. Hillary had 3 million more than Trump.

A poor straw man. Electors are used in the Presidential election, as the founders planned for a reason. A local election is much different than one of thousands of square miles.

Why isn't the whiner fighting it in court?

Those rules have been in effect for a long time, haven't they?

So they were in place before the election, right? I didn't hear any complaining before your idiot right winger lost. Why not?

 

[depotoo]

And you think if it had been the opposite result, no whining from the left would have occurred, right?
Most people probably had no real concept of how it would work.

No, they just started it in 2018.

He did and lost.
But you tell me how when you throw out the last candidate ranked choice, and then use those votes added to the top candidates, how do you know the intent of the voter of those lower candidates, to be able to then subscribe those votes to the top two candidate choices.

A poor straw man. Electors are used in the Presidential election, as the founders planned for a reason. A local election is much different than one of thousands of square miles.

Why isn't the whiner fighting it in court?

Those rules have been in effect for a long time, haven't they?

So they were in place before the election, right? I didn't hear any complaining before your idiot right winger lost. Why not?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

What is wacky is ranked choice voting can change who the winner is, even though the other candidate had the most votes.

No different than a run-off election when a candidate does not reach the prescribed percentage of votes. This just saves the state the money of doing it at a later date.

 

[depotoo]

What is wacky is ranked choice voting can change who the winner is, even though the other candidate had the most votes.

No different than a run-off election when a candidate does not reach the prescribed percentage of votes. This just saves the state the money of doing it at a later date.

In a runoff , a person can decide if they want either candidate. If not, they stay home.