incorrect. I don't want the voters in California and New York telling the rest of the country how to spend their electors. Your way, 2 States control all your votes.Sounds to me like a perverted form of voter suppression
Only an idiot would claim that the law endorsing the person who gets the most votes is voter suppression.
also sounds like a strong SCOTUS issue!
Because you don't like it? The constitution is perfectly clear. Each state chooses the method for appointing electors. Period. Get over it, snowflake.
Bad move... What if TRUMP WINS the popular vote? You gonna congratulate these mental midgets for their brilliant plan when NY, Cal, DC, and MAINE turn red on election night? It's naked power grabbing..
And I don't like it. But that doesn't matter.. What matters is that states cannot PRESCRIBE voting rules like that to their electors in the Electoral College. That's why you always get a few renegade electors that DO NOT FOLLOW the vote and end up voting for people either NOT on the ballot or who were never NOMINATED to run i in the general election..
You should spend more time understanding how things work and less time wasted defending ideas that are clearly partisan power grabbing... Stupid ideas that could backfire horribly on the conspirator babies....What if TRUMP WINS the popular vote?
Then maybe it was a good idea?
The door swings both ways, dope.
The only way you're against it is if you believe the Repubs will never get the popular vote.