danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Jan 24, 2015
- 73,961
- 5,055
The higher the multiplier the better.Indeed I do. And since your plan raised my taxes, I will accept the extra income to help balance it out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The higher the multiplier the better.Indeed I do. And since your plan raised my taxes, I will accept the extra income to help balance it out.
Someone in poverty who is unemployed in an at-will employment State should not be denied or disparaged unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.Oh, so now it is only people living in poverty who get the unemployment compensation?
To my case.your UE insurance denial?
There was still a gold standard back then.not really. Adam Smith had already wrote the Wealth of Nations
I do believe Karl Marx theories were well…sounded pretty…
A comprehensive solution. Unlike what right-wingers ever do.Oh, so in addition to the fantasy of free money for anyone without a job, you want to write tax laws now? lol
ok. yeah cash has to have some sort of value. That hasn’t changedThere was still a gold standard back then.
Someone in poverty who is unemployed in an at-will employment State should not be denied or disparaged unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.
A comprehensive solution. Unlike what right-wingers ever do.
Vote blue not red!
Pre-WWII Germany could not get away with simply printing money.ok. yeah cash has to have some sort of value. That hasn’t changed
What if they accept the job offer?What if they are offered a job making $15 an hour?
Noone is making you prefer "greed" over need. Unlike right-wingers preferring unequal protection of the laws so the Rich can get richer.Raising taxes on people you dislike is not about a solution. It is about vindictive revenge.
If I didn't work I would be in poverty, as most people would be but now you claim I'm greedy? So you only want certian people to collect and others not to?In my opinion, a person in poverty merely lacking an income who is unemployed should be able to automatically obtain unemployment compensation in an at-will employment State.
So why couldn't I?In my opinion, a person in poverty merely lacking an income who is unemployed should be able to automatically obtain unemployment compensation in an at-will employment State.
they tried…no country and just get away with simply printing moneyPre-WWII Germany could not get away with simply printing money.
What if they accept the job offer?
Why do you assume that conclusion?If I didn't work I would be in poverty, as most people would be but now you claim I'm greedy? So you only want certian people to collect and others not to?
I am not saying you couldn't if you were unemployed.So why couldn't I?
What hyperinflation? And, it was not a problem until the supply chain got overstressed.they tried…no country and just get away with simply printing money
it makes the money worthless….we are seeing that now in the US thanks to the Xiden admin, it’s called hyperinflation
I am looking for work I can do from home.That would be preferable.
And if someone offered you a $15 an hour job?
the hyperinflation happening nowWhat hyperinflation? And, it was not a problem until the supply chain got overstressed.