Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”It's not a border thread. You're just reciting words you've written so many times you don't even think about them.
At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."
I don't have Standing, without it.
We can also use a dissertation on how solving simple poverty would reduce our homeless problem.
This is the Law for Legal purposes: Section 2922. 2922. An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other.And obviously you were free to quit. You just were not qualified to draw unemployment.
When you quit, did you think you were eligible for unemployment?
Proof, right-wingers prefer ignorance to promoting or providing for the general welfare?Not this again. No, making everyone eligible for unemployment compensation will not cure the homeless problem.
This is the Law for Legal purposes: Section 2922. 2922. An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other.
I had no rational reason to doubt it under the common law.
For what?LMAO!! So you were an idiot in addition to being lazy?
No, there is no excuse for your assumption about something that is common knowledge and could have beeen verified with a single phone call.
No, it is proof you are willing to have your ideas refuted over and over.Proof, right-wingers prefer ignorance to promoting or providing for the general welfare?
For what?
(a) A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the laws;
Right-wing hypocrisy is why we need dissertations.No, it is proof you are willing to have your ideas refuted over and over.
So your new unemployment compensation program will cure the homeless problem?
People who have no mailing address, bank account or ID, and you want to give them a check? Those with substance abuse problems will end up dead in short order. Those with mental health issues will suffer the ravages of crime against them as people attack them to steal the $2,200+ that they will have on their person if they can get the check cashed.
This is the Legal doctrine in question: At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."For not verifying that you would qualify for unemployment compensation if you quit your job. You just assumed you would get a check and so you voluntarily quit a job that was paying you.
Right-wing hypocrisy is why we need dissertations.
Why do you believe it won't discover solutions to our problems?A dissertation will not give the homeless a mailing address, an ID or a bank account. It will not protect them from being the victims of violent crime when they are walking around with over $2k on their person.
This is the Legal doctrine in question: At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."
Why do you believe it won't discover solutions to our problems?
You are simply too judgmental and prove right-wingers, like yourself, don't really care about being Legal to the Law except in border threads.And, obviously, you were allowed to quit your job without any prosecution or penalty. But not verifying that unemployment compensation would be available was stupid.
Also, you have to be employed for a certain length of time. Were you?
You are simply too judgmental and prove right-wingers, like yourself, don't really care about being Legal to the Law except in border threads.
I agree to disagree. We have a better understanding of economics and the law now. Only right-wingers can be in an industry for twenty plus years and be "worthless" for better solutions at lower cost purposes.Homelessness has been studied from every angle for decades. No solutions.
Now you think by creating this makeshift welfare problem, you will cure it? If the current welfare system did not cure it, why do you think your plan will?
