Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Illegals should not be count towards elected representation in the houseThere's nothing for me to dodge. This thread is about whether or not we should ask if the census should include a question about ones citizenship. Not about if they're here legally or not.yes it is stop dodgingDumbfuck, this thread has nothing to do with illegal aliens.most illegals are paid under the table.And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted. Don't you ever feel stupid?And were not counted as such. They were Indians.
As always, you prove to be too clueless to participate.
Holyfuckingshit!Dumbfuck, this thread has nothing to do with illegal aliens.most illegals are paid under the table.And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted. Don't you ever feel stupid?And were not counted as such. They were Indians.LOL
Who were not U.S. citizens.
DUMBFUCK, this thread is about the "Citizenship" question, WHO do you thinks it's directed at.
GOD you are stupid.
LOLOLhe's in panic mode lolDumbfuck, this thread has nothing to do with illegal aliens.most illegals are paid under the table.And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted. Don't you ever feel stupid?And were not counted as such. They were Indians.
DUMBFUCK, this thread is about the "Citizenship" question, WHO do you thinks it's directed at.
GOD you are stupid.
Majority Want Citizenship Question On Census, 53%-32%
A Canadian taking a job in San Diego pays US and California taxes, ignoramus.Dumbfuck.... you have to be a resident in one of the 50 states. And unless you're an Indian, it doesn't matter whether or not you pay taxes. Why does such a simple concept baffle you so?You don’t have to reside there. You get income from a different state YOU live in you’re paying taxes in that state.Does he reside here?And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted. Don't you ever feel stupid?And were not counted as such. They were Indians.And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted.
All you have is dumbass lies.
If Putin took a 2 month job working in Los Angeles, he’s paying US taxes.
Great, take your argument over who should be counted over to a thread where that's being discussed.Illegals should not be count towards elected representation in the houseThere's nothing for me to dodge. This thread is about whether or not we should ask if the census should include a question about ones citizenship. Not about if they're here legally or not.yes it is stop dodgingDumbfuck, this thread has nothing to do with illegal aliens.most illegals are paid under the table.And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted. Don't you ever feel stupid?
As always, you prove to be too clueless to participate.
Why do I provide links?Majority Want Citizenship Question On Census, 53%-32%
The majority of whom?
Those of age 18 or older?
Or is it the majority of citizens or of those who claim they are citizens when asked on a Gallup // Reuters // AP opinion poll?
I am getting really, really sick of the Fourth-Estate Mainstream Media owned & operated exclusively by ultra-wealthy left-wing Jews.
I'm not talking about people who keep kosher or put a menorah in the window for Hanukkah, and I think they know that.
Oh look, an idiot ^^^ who actually thinks this is going to impact voters' decision on the next president.53-32.There's nothing for me to dodge. This thread is about whether or not we should ask if the census should include a question about ones citizenship. Not about if they're here legally or not.yes it is stop dodgingDumbfuck, this thread has nothing to do with illegal aliens.most illegals are paid under the table.And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted. Don't you ever feel stupid?
As always, you prove to be too clueless to participate.
Trump 2020 thanks you for your tireless support.
Again.... this is not about counting illegals. It's about counting non‐U.S citizens.Dancing in a diaper full of shit does not make you look good.Thanks for proving me right...Congressional Apportionment - Frequently Asked Questions - People and Households - U.S. Census BureauI agree why should a state be given credit for have illegals only citizens should be counted on the census
In the entire time that the US has done the census, it has never only counted citizens.
The apportionment calculation is based upon the total resident population (citizens and non-citizens) of the 50 states.
There is literally no reason to count illegals other than to get addresses to follow up with ice
You failed to refute your own stupidity.Fucking moron, my argument refuted the idiotic claims of one of your fellow herd members.That seems to be your argument.Fucking moron, it mentions how we apportion the number of U.S. representatives in the House. Which blows up the moronic con argument in this thread that we should count non-U.S. citizens in the census for the purpose of apportioning U.S. representatives.The 14th Amendment doesn't mention the census, moron.Holyfuckingshit!It also counted black saves as 3/5 of a person. Is that what you're defending?
No, ya fucking moron. I quoted the 14th Amendment which stipulates we count the "whole" number of "persons" with the only exception being Indians who are not taxed.
Don't you ever feel stupid for posting such fucking moronic nonsense?
Neither one should receive representation in Congress.Again.... this is not about counting illegals. It's about counting non‐U.S citizens.Dancing in a diaper full of shit does not make you look good.Thanks for proving me right...Congressional Apportionment - Frequently Asked Questions - People and Households - U.S. Census BureauI agree why should a state be given credit for have illegals only citizens should be counted on the census
In the entire time that the US has done the census, it has never only counted citizens.
The apportionment calculation is based upon the total resident population (citizens and non-citizens) of the 50 states.
There is literally no reason to count illegals other than to get addresses to follow up with ice
How many illegal aliens do you imagine inform the government they're here by responding to the U.S. census?
You failed to refute your own stupidity.Fucking moron, my argument refuted the idiotic claims of one of your fellow herd members.That seems to be your argument.Fucking moron, it mentions how we apportion the number of U.S. representatives in the House. Which blows up the moronic con argument in this thread that we should count non-U.S. citizens in the census for the purpose of apportioning U.S. representatives.The 14th Amendment doesn't mention the census, moron.Holyfuckingshit!
No, ya fucking moron. I quoted the 14th Amendment which stipulates we count the "whole" number of "persons" with the only exception being Indians who are not taxed.
Don't you ever feel stupid for posting such fucking moronic nonsense?
this is not about counting illegals. It's about counting non‐U.S citizens.
Again... run from what? You're not actually arguing g with anything I'm posting. You're arguing with your own.made up strawmen.Holyfuckingshit!Holyfuckingshit!Dumbfuck, who said section two refutes section one?
Now you're reduced to ascribing arguments to others that are not being made because you failed miserably to prove your own argument.
YOU are trying to kid.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
NOTHING in the 14th ascribes "rights" of "citizenship" to illegals.
NOTHING.
You're actually getting more retarded as this thread progresses. I never said anything in the 14th Amendment establishes rights of citizenship to illegals.
Can't you argue what's actually being debated and stop making up these imaginary arguments that exist nowhere outside of your vacant skull?
Ok then...WHY are you against asking them if they are citizens?
Do you ever argue with what other posters actually say? Or are you only capable of arguing with the voices haunting your empty head?
Dumbfuck... I actually said I see no reason not to add that question to the census. Twice.
So other than cultist-like dementia, what excuse do you have for still thinking I'm against it??
Run little man....run.
Again.... this is not about counting illegals. It's about counting non‐U.S citizens.Dancing in a diaper full of shit does not make you look good.Thanks for proving me right...Congressional Apportionment - Frequently Asked Questions - People and Households - U.S. Census BureauI agree why should a state be given credit for have illegals only citizens should be counted on the census
In the entire time that the US has done the census, it has never only counted citizens.
The apportionment calculation is based upon the total resident population (citizens and non-citizens) of the 50 states.
There is literally no reason to count illegals other than to get addresses to follow up with ice
How many illegal aliens do you imagine inform the government they're here by responding to the U.S. census?
That idiot is playing semantics. Don't dignity that fool with a legit responseNeither one should receive representation in Congress.Again.... this is not about counting illegals. It's about counting non‐U.S citizens.Dancing in a diaper full of shit does not make you look good.Thanks for proving me right...Congressional Apportionment - Frequently Asked Questions - People and Households - U.S. Census BureauIn the entire time that the US has done the census, it has never only counted citizens.
The apportionment calculation is based upon the total resident population (citizens and non-citizens) of the 50 states.
There is literally no reason to count illegals other than to get addresses to follow up with ice
How many illegal aliens do you imagine inform the government they're here by responding to the U.S. census?
It's obvious to anyone with a brain. Those Indians were paying taxes. Why should people who pay no taxes receive representation?It does?? Then why did they count Indians who were taxed who were not U.S. citizens before 1924?“Constitution says we count the "whole number of persons" for the apportionment of representatives.”Really? Illegal aliens have never been a significant problem in this country until quite recently, so why would it?
Because we have always had non-citizens living among us.
Jake? Is that you Jake the snake?
So your argument is---------------------->We always allowed them to steal our stuff, so we should keep allowing it?
Good argument, lol!
No, my argument is that the Constitution says we count the "whole number of persons" for the apportionment of representatives. So, that is what I think we should do.
I am one of those odd few that think we should follow our Constitution.
Which means asking if they are citizens.
Dancing in a diaper full of shit does not make you look good.Thanks for proving me right...Congressional Apportionment - Frequently Asked Questions - People and Households - U.S. Census BureauI agree why should a state be given credit for have illegals only citizens should be counted on the census
In the entire time that the US has done the census, it has never only counted citizens.
The apportionment calculation is based upon the total resident population (citizens and non-citizens) of the 50 states.
There is literally no reason to count illegals other than to get addresses to follow up with ice
Again... run from what? You're not actually arguing g with anything I'm posting. You're arguing with your own.made up strawmen.Holyfuckingshit!Holyfuckingshit!YOU are trying to kid.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
NOTHING in the 14th ascribes "rights" of "citizenship" to illegals.
NOTHING.
You're actually getting more retarded as this thread progresses. I never said anything in the 14th Amendment establishes rights of citizenship to illegals.
Can't you argue what's actually being debated and stop making up these imaginary arguments that exist nowhere outside of your vacant skull?
Ok then...WHY are you against asking them if they are citizens?
Do you ever argue with what other posters actually say? Or are you only capable of arguing with the voices haunting your empty head?
Dumbfuck... I actually said I see no reason not to add that question to the census. Twice.
So other than cultist-like dementia, what excuse do you have for still thinking I'm against it??
Run little man....run.
And you're losing to them too.
Dumbfuck, what does that have to do with the U.S. census and apportioning House representatives?A Canadian taking a job in San Diego pays US and California taxes, ignoramus.Dumbfuck.... you have to be a resident in one of the 50 states. And unless you're an Indian, it doesn't matter whether or not you pay taxes. Why does such a simple concept baffle you so?You don’t have to reside there. You get income from a different state YOU live in you’re paying taxes in that state.Does he reside here?And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted. Don't you ever feel stupid?And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted.
All you have is dumbass lies.
If Putin took a 2 month job working in Los Angeles, he’s paying US taxes.
