Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His response invokes pity....Dumbfuck, this thread has nothing to do with illegal aliens.most illegals are paid under the table.And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted. Don't you ever feel stupid?And were not counted as such. They were Indians.LOL
Who were not U.S. citizens.
DUMBFUCK, this thread is about the "Citizenship" question, WHO do you thinks it's directed at.
GOD you are stupid.
Which Brown nation did you flee?another ignorant thread
God bless you inbreeds!
His response invokes pity....Dumbfuck, this thread has nothing to do with illegal aliens.most illegals are paid under the table.And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted. Don't you ever feel stupid?And were not counted as such. They were Indians.
DUMBFUCK, this thread is about the "Citizenship" question, WHO do you thinks it's directed at.
GOD you are stupid.
How can someone be that stupid?
Judging by how everyone claims they did not vote for her they [illegals] must be the only ones who voted for herFaun wants illegals to vote because he doesn't want a "Hillary" defeat to occur again.
LOLNo they are not. They represent the voting public.They also represent non-U.S. citizens who reside here legally.Yet those representatives are not representing illegals. They are representing citizens of their districts.Holyfuckingshit!LOL
You still don't understand "persons" includes non-U.S. citizens??
"“all persons born or naturalized in the United States.”"
Fourteenth Amendment | Definition, Summary, & Date
How does this apply to illegal Hispanics kid?
Dumbfuck, you're referring to section one, which is about citizenship; while I'm referring to section two, which is about apportioning representation.
LOLOLHolyfuckingshit!Dumbfuck, who said section two refutes section one?Holyfuckingshit!
Dumbfuck, you're referring to section one, which is about citizenship; while I'm referring to section two, which is about apportioning representation.
Tell me kid, how does section two refute any other section? You DO know that section two talks about those who have the "right" to vote right....? Do illegals have the "right" to vote?
Now you're reduced to ascribing arguments to others that are not being made because you failed miserably to prove your own argument.
YOU are trying to kid.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
NOTHING in the 14th ascribes "rights" of "citizenship" to illegals.
NOTHING.
You're actually getting more retarded as this thread progresses. I never said anything in the 14th Amendment establishes rights of citizenship to illegals.
Can't you argue what's actually being debated and stop making up these imaginary arguments that exist nowhere outside of your vacant skull?
LOL, run kid run.
Then why did they count tax-paying Indians who were not citizens?That's why the republicans made the 3/5 compromise to stop the democrats spread of slavery in territories that would become states.and yes it only counted citizens.I agree why should a state be given credit for have illegals only citizens should be counted on the census
In the entire time that the US has done the census, it has never only counted citizens.
States should not be given credit that dictates representation for a crime against federal law.Congressional Apportionment - Frequently Asked Questions - People and Households - U.S. Census BureauI agree why should a state be given credit for have illegals only citizens should be counted on the census
In the entire time that the US has done the census, it has never only counted citizens.
I already posted that link, but will again highlight hte important parts...
Who is included in the apportionment population counts? back to top
The apportionment calculation is based upon the total resident population (citizens and non-citizens) of the 50 states. In the 2010 Census, the apportionment population also includes U.S. Armed Forces personnel and federal civilian employees stationed outside the United States (and their dependents living with them) that can be allocated, based on administrative records, back to a home state. This is the same procedure used in 2000.
LOLOLHolyfuckingshit!Dumbfuck, who said section two refutes section one?Tell me kid, how does section two refute any other section? You DO know that section two talks about those who have the "right" to vote right....? Do illegals have the "right" to vote?
Now you're reduced to ascribing arguments to others that are not being made because you failed miserably to prove your own argument.
YOU are trying to kid.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
NOTHING in the 14th ascribes "rights" of "citizenship" to illegals.
NOTHING.
You're actually getting more retarded as this thread progresses. I never said anything in the 14th Amendment establishes rights of citizenship to illegals.
Can't you argue what's actually being debated and stop making up these imaginary arguments that exist nowhere outside of your vacant skull?
LOL, run kid run.
Run from what? Your strawmen??
illegals are paid under the table. Indians had their own nationThen why did they count tax-paying Indians who were not citizens?That's why the republicans made the 3/5 compromise to stop the democrats spread of slavery in territories that would become states.and yes it only counted citizens.I agree why should a state be given credit for have illegals only citizens should be counted on the census
In the entire time that the US has done the census, it has never only counted citizens.
Thanks for proving me right...Congressional Apportionment - Frequently Asked Questions - People and Households - U.S. Census BureauI agree why should a state be given credit for have illegals only citizens should be counted on the census
In the entire time that the US has done the census, it has never only counted citizens.
They represent the voters of their districtsLOLNo they are not. They represent the voting public.They also represent non-U.S. citizens who reside here legally.Yet those representatives are not representing illegals. They are representing citizens of their districts.Holyfuckingshit!"“all persons born or naturalized in the United States.”"
Fourteenth Amendment | Definition, Summary, & Date
How does this apply to illegal Hispanics kid?
Dumbfuck, you're referring to section one, which is about citizenship; while I'm referring to section two, which is about apportioning representation.
Is that what your representative states? Mine says he representatives the people in his district.
There's nothing for me to dodge. This thread is about whether or not we should ask if the census should include a question about ones citizenship. Not about if they're here legally or not.yes it is stop dodgingDumbfuck, this thread has nothing to do with illegal aliens.most illegals are paid under the table.And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted. Don't you ever feel stupid?And were not counted as such. They were Indians.LOL
Who were not U.S. citizens.
53-32.There's nothing for me to dodge. This thread is about whether or not we should ask if the census should include a question about ones citizenship. Not about if they're here legally or not.yes it is stop dodgingDumbfuck, this thread has nothing to do with illegal aliens.most illegals are paid under the table.And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted. Don't you ever feel stupid?And were not counted as such. They were Indians.
As always, you prove to be too clueless to participate.
Dancing in a diaper full of shit does not make you look good.Thanks for proving me right...Congressional Apportionment - Frequently Asked Questions - People and Households - U.S. Census BureauI agree why should a state be given credit for have illegals only citizens should be counted on the census
In the entire time that the US has done the census, it has never only counted citizens.
The apportionment calculation is based upon the total resident population (citizens and non-citizens) of the 50 states.
It is utterly absurd to me that there is even a doubt that citizenship should be on the census. Don’t we need and want to know who lives in this country and where they come from?
Holyfuckingshit!Holyfuckingshit!Dumbfuck, who said section two refutes section one?Holyfuckingshit!
Dumbfuck, you're referring to section one, which is about citizenship; while I'm referring to section two, which is about apportioning representation.
Tell me kid, how does section two refute any other section? You DO know that section two talks about those who have the "right" to vote right....? Do illegals have the "right" to vote?
Now you're reduced to ascribing arguments to others that are not being made because you failed miserably to prove your own argument.
YOU are trying to kid.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
NOTHING in the 14th ascribes "rights" of "citizenship" to illegals.
NOTHING.
You're actually getting more retarded as this thread progresses. I never said anything in the 14th Amendment establishes rights of citizenship to illegals.
Can't you argue what's actually being debated and stop making up these imaginary arguments that exist nowhere outside of your vacant skull?
Ok then...WHY are you against asking them if they are citizens?
Holyfuckingshit!Holyfuckingshit!Dumbfuck, who said section two refutes section one?Tell me kid, how does section two refute any other section? You DO know that section two talks about those who have the "right" to vote right....? Do illegals have the "right" to vote?
Now you're reduced to ascribing arguments to others that are not being made because you failed miserably to prove your own argument.
YOU are trying to kid.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
NOTHING in the 14th ascribes "rights" of "citizenship" to illegals.
NOTHING.
You're actually getting more retarded as this thread progresses. I never said anything in the 14th Amendment establishes rights of citizenship to illegals.
Can't you argue what's actually being debated and stop making up these imaginary arguments that exist nowhere outside of your vacant skull?
Ok then...WHY are you against asking them if they are citizens?
Do you ever argue with what other posters actually say? Or are you only capable of arguing with the voices haunting your empty head?
Dumbfuck... I actually said I see no reason not to add that question to the census. Twice.
So other than cultist-like dementia, what excuse do you have for still thinking I'm against it??
Dumbfuck.... you have to be a resident in one of the 50 states. And unless you're an Indian, it doesn't matter whether or not you pay taxes. Why does such a simple concept baffle you so?You don’t have to reside there. You get income from a different state YOU live in you’re paying taxes in that state.Does he reside here?And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted. Don't you ever feel stupid?And were not counted as such. They were Indians.LOL
Who were not U.S. citizens.And yet, the Constitution says if they pay taxes, they are to be counted.
All you have is dumbass lies.
If Putin took a 2 month job working in Los Angeles, he’s paying US taxes.
Which Brown nation did you flee?another ignorant thread
God bless you inbreeds!
Which Brown nation did you flee?another ignorant thread
God bless you inbreeds!
