Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
That hasn't been determined yet.
Which is why it will never be filed. The FEC stated it had no intention of filing such a charge.
Yet Bragg is attempting to pursue these charges under federal statutes, himself.
He's prosecuting a bogus case solely for the purpose of preventing Trump from running for office. Only a lying douchebag would deny it. No one said a legitimate case against Trump can't be prosecuted. This case isn't legitimate.
Cases are never part of discovery, shit for brains. You just proved you're a lying douchebag..
No, the question is, has the misdemeanor morphed into a felony, in accordance with the law.
Which is why it will never be filed. The FEC stated it had no intention of filing such a charge.
Trump wasn't convicted of it, so no banana. It doesn't matter what Cohen was charged with.
Charges he's attempting to prosecute under federal statues.No, Bragg is pursuing state charges of Falsification of Business Records, not campaign finance charges.
WW
Specific conditions have to be made to make it a felony, which Bragg hasn't yet mentioned.That the New York State Penal Code has a base 5 year SOL for felonies which can be extended an additional 5 years for any periods where the defendant is outside the state? No, that is in the law.
Charges he's attempting to prosecute under federal statues.
Specific conditions have to be made to make it a felony, which Bragg hasn't yet mentioned.
Sorry, he is not attempting to prosecute anything under federal statutes.
Meh.....legal minded people on both sides of the aisle, with more apparent knowledge of the law than you are exhibiting have said quite differently. I'll go with them on this.Sorry, he is not attempting to prosecute anything under federal statutes. All he has to do is show that Trumps falsification of business records was intended to hid a crime. That crime can be federal or state and that crime can be committed by another. Oh wait - Cohen.
Sure he did, the connection is made beginning on Page 1 of the Statement of Facts.
WW
Meh.....legal minded people on both sides of the aisle, with more apparent knowledge of the law than you are exhibiting have said quite differently. I'll go with them on this.
Nope.....LOL"Legal Minded People" means talking heads being paid to whip up their tribe
Nope.....LOL
Have a nice day.
We don't need to see all the evidence to know it's bogus. Just the fact that Bragg filed all the charges as felonies tells you it's bogus. To be felonies, those charges depend on a charge that hasn't been filed, and never will be filed. Only a sleazy lying douchebag would pretend this case is legitimate.LOL
It's amusing watching a fucking moron cry how this is a bogus case. A fucking moron, might I add, who hasn't even yet seen all the evidence -- but still thinks it's bogus.
Trump didn't have to be convicted of it. All Bragg has to prove in court is that he was either involved with setting it up ... or that he was trying to cover it up by listing his business reports as "legal services."
So Trump is accused of trying to cover up a non-crime?You're beyond brain-dead to think Bragg would file charges against Trump KNOWING the case will get thrown out upon Trump's first motion to dismiss, based on there not being an underlying offense.
We don't need to see all the evidence to know it's bogus. Just the fact that Bragg filed all the charges as felonies tells you it's bogus. To be felonies, those charges depend on a charge that hasn't been filed, and never will be filed. Only a sleazy lying douchebag would pretend this case is legitimate.
LOL
You fucking moron, I never said that. You said the underlying offense hasn't been filed. To which I pointed out, it will be forthcoming with discovery.
