Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The reason there are questions about the Pentagon is simple---But wait.....There’s more!
If you think the idea of the WTC being wired for a controlled demo is preposterous
Look at 9-11 truth claims about the Pentagon
Damage was not caused by an airliner being flown into the Pentagon, it was caused by a missile that was fired just as the airline was flying over. Then, the government scattered airline debris all over the site
Can’t make this shit up
why were all the cameras off ?
You mean was FDR warned the Japs were coming and let it happen anyway ?Questions still remain about Pearl Harbor too
9-11 Truthers Alternative Reality
While being constructed, the WTC towers and Building 7 were wired with thermite waiting for the day when terrorists would hijack planes and fly them into the towers
OK 9-11 Truthers
Is this your explanation or not?
Personally? No.
My only position is that the governments story is bullshit.
Burden of proof is on you
If you claim a controlled demo, you must concede the idiocy of your scenario
WTC was wired for a controlled demo just in case someone flew planes into the buildings
YOUR theory.....defend it
Different conspiracy theoryYou mean was FDR warned the Japs were coming and let it happen anyway ?Questions still remain about Pearl Harbor too
Yep.
The government provided reams of proof about what happened on 9-119-11 Truthers Alternative Reality
While being constructed, the WTC towers and Building 7 were wired with thermite waiting for the day when terrorists would hijack planes and fly them into the towers
OK 9-11 Truthers
Is this your explanation or not?
Personally? No.
My only position is that the governments story is bullshit.
Burden of proof is on you
If you claim a controlled demo, you must concede the idiocy of your scenario
WTC was wired for a controlled demo just in case someone flew planes into the buildings
YOUR theory.....defend it
NO IT IS NOT!
The burden of proof is on YOU to support the governments theory. YOU CAN'T.
You are asking me to support a theory which I do not support, to prove something I do not believe.
I have told you multiple times, I DO NOT KNOW what happened.
I only know what did NOT happen.
I have no theory. Thus, I do not have to prove anything.
I debated every year in high school, and for two years on a Big Ten College team. Do not tell me how debate happen, or how burden of proof works.
Wow, you are incredibly stupid if you think that is how this works.
STOP with the strawman already.
simpleYet, you can’t point to a single lie. . . and the Majority of USMB knows everything rightwinger posts are lies.
You are correct, nothing changes.
The Biggest LIES of 9/11
https://off-guardian.org/2017/09/28/the-biggest-lies-of-911/
". . .A simple building collapse does NOT generate enough energy to hurl a multi-ton steel beam–from the South Tower–nearly 400 feet away and have enough energy left over to impale the beam into the Deutsche Bank building, as seen in the picture below:
"
Have you calculated the energy generated by the collapse of a hundred story building?
Would “thermite” have caused a beam to project that far?
Show your math
A) Never in the history of high rise building fires, has a building collapsed due to fire.
B) In every controlled demolition in history, there has never been enough energy to throw out multi-ton steel beams. I never, ever, held the position that thermite alone did this, thus, I don't have to prove anything.
C) It is the job of YOU to prove the governments theory, that fire could cause such a preposterous thing to happen. I don't have to prove YOUR foolish conspiracy theory.
A) Never in the history of high rise building fires, has a building collapsed due to fire.
Never before in the history of the WTC have jets crashed into the buildings.
The government provided reams of proof about what happened on 9-119-11 Truthers Alternative Reality
While being constructed, the WTC towers and Building 7 were wired with thermite waiting for the day when terrorists would hijack planes and fly them into the towers
OK 9-11 Truthers
Is this your explanation or not?
Personally? No.
My only position is that the governments story is bullshit.
Burden of proof is on you
If you claim a controlled demo, you must concede the idiocy of your scenario
WTC was wired for a controlled demo just in case someone flew planes into the buildings
YOUR theory.....defend it
NO IT IS NOT!
The burden of proof is on YOU to support the governments theory. YOU CAN'T.
You are asking me to support a theory which I do not support, to prove something I do not believe.
I have told you multiple times, I DO NOT KNOW what happened.
I only know what did NOT happen.
I have no theory. Thus, I do not have to prove anything.
I debated every year in high school, and for two years on a Big Ten College team. Do not tell me how debate happen, or how burden of proof works.
Wow, you are incredibly stupid if you think that is how this works.
STOP with the strawman already.
If you disagree, you must provide proof of your alternative reality
Was the WTC wired for a controlled demo or not?
Why wouldn’t they?simpleYet, you can’t point to a single lie
The Biggest LIES of 9/11
https://off-guardian.org/2017/09/28/the-biggest-lies-of-911/
". . .A simple building collapse does NOT generate enough energy to hurl a multi-ton steel beam–from the South Tower–nearly 400 feet away and have enough energy left over to impale the beam into the Deutsche Bank building, as seen in the picture below:
"
Have you calculated the energy generated by the collapse of a hundred story building?
Would “thermite” have caused a beam to project that far?
Show your math
A) Never in the history of high rise building fires, has a building collapsed due to fire.
B) In every controlled demolition in history, there has never been enough energy to throw out multi-ton steel beams. I never, ever, held the position that thermite alone did this, thus, I don't have to prove anything.
C) It is the job of YOU to prove the governments theory, that fire could cause such a preposterous thing to happen. I don't have to prove YOUR foolish conspiracy theory.
A) Never in the history of high rise building fires, has a building collapsed due to fire.
Never before in the history of the WTC have jets crashed into the buildings.
So you believe if a jet airliner should ever crash into a building again, it will likewise collapse, taking surrounding buildings with it?
Different theory, same Deep State.Different conspiracy theoryYou mean was FDR warned the Japs were coming and let it happen anyway ?Questions still remain about Pearl Harbor too
Yep.
This is about 9-11
We have the definitive models now.So you believe if a jet airliner should ever crash into a building again, it will likewise collapse, taking surrounding buildings with it?
The government provided reams of proof about what happened on 9-11OK 9-11 Truthers
Is this your explanation or not?
Personally? No.
My only position is that the governments story is bullshit.
Burden of proof is on you
If you claim a controlled demo, you must concede the idiocy of your scenario
WTC was wired for a controlled demo just in case someone flew planes into the buildings
YOUR theory.....defend it
NO IT IS NOT!
The burden of proof is on YOU to support the governments theory. YOU CAN'T.
You are asking me to support a theory which I do not support, to prove something I do not believe.
I have told you multiple times, I DO NOT KNOW what happened.
I only know what did NOT happen.
I have no theory. Thus, I do not have to prove anything.
I debated every year in high school, and for two years on a Big Ten College team. Do not tell me how debate happen, or how burden of proof works.
Wow, you are incredibly stupid if you think that is how this works.
STOP with the strawman already.
If you disagree, you must provide proof of your alternative reality
Was the WTC wired for a controlled demo or not?
Actually, no, the government did NOT provide for so called "reams of proof." Just a fairy tale.
When educated folks tried to twice, it was peer reviewed, found lacking in it's Data and modeling.
Upon the third try?
It the government classified it's Data and modeling, so no peer review could be done.
Thus, I CAN NOT provide any proof otherwise.
This is why all of the data, from all these agencies has been destroyed. The SEC data, the Able Danger data, all of it. ONE BIG COVER-UP. Start to finish.
But then. .. I think you know this, don't you?
http://cryptome.org/wtc-nist-wtc7-no.pdf
The reason there are questions about the Pentagon is simple---But wait.....There’s more!
If you think the idea of the WTC being wired for a controlled demo is preposterous
Look at 9-11 truth claims about the Pentagon
Damage was not caused by an airliner being flown into the Pentagon, it was caused by a missile that was fired just as the airline was flying over. Then, the government scattered airline debris all over the site
Can’t make this shit up
why were all the cameras off ?
Which cameras were off?
And what could that possibly have to do with an airline hitting the Pentagon?
Do you believe the government spread aircraft debris around the Pentagon or not?
The government provided reams of proof about what happened on 9-11Personally? No.
My only position is that the governments story is bullshit.
Burden of proof is on you
If you claim a controlled demo, you must concede the idiocy of your scenario
WTC was wired for a controlled demo just in case someone flew planes into the buildings
YOUR theory.....defend it
NO IT IS NOT!
The burden of proof is on YOU to support the governments theory. YOU CAN'T.
You are asking me to support a theory which I do not support, to prove something I do not believe.
I have told you multiple times, I DO NOT KNOW what happened.
I only know what did NOT happen.
I have no theory. Thus, I do not have to prove anything.
I debated every year in high school, and for two years on a Big Ten College team. Do not tell me how debate happen, or how burden of proof works.
Wow, you are incredibly stupid if you think that is how this works.
STOP with the strawman already.
If you disagree, you must provide proof of your alternative reality
Was the WTC wired for a controlled demo or not?
Actually, no, the government did NOT provide for so called "reams of proof." Just a fairy tale.
When educated folks tried to twice, it was peer reviewed, found lacking in it's Data and modeling.
Upon the third try?
It the government classified it's Data and modeling, so no peer review could be done.
Thus, I CAN NOT provide any proof otherwise.
This is why all of the data, from all these agencies has been destroyed. The SEC data, the Able Danger data, all of it. ONE BIG COVER-UP. Start to finish.
But then. .. I think you know this, don't you?
http://cryptome.org/wtc-nist-wtc7-no.pdf
What we know
A jet airline flew into each tower at high speed
Those airlines smashed huge hole in the building and created massive fires
People caught in the buildings were so terrified of the fires that they jumped rather than face the fires
Damage and intense fires caused TWO equally designed towers under identical circumstances to collapse
Prove anything else caused the collapse
What we know
A jet airline flew into each tower at high speed
Those airlines smashed huge hole in the building and created massive fires
People caught in the buildings were so terrified of the fires that they jumped rather than face the fires
Damage and intense fires caused TWO equally designed towers under identical circumstances to collapse
Prove anything else caused the collapse
simpleYet, you can’t point to a single lie
The Biggest LIES of 9/11
https://off-guardian.org/2017/09/28/the-biggest-lies-of-911/
". . .A simple building collapse does NOT generate enough energy to hurl a multi-ton steel beam–from the South Tower–nearly 400 feet away and have enough energy left over to impale the beam into the Deutsche Bank building, as seen in the picture below:
"
Have you calculated the energy generated by the collapse of a hundred story building?
Would “thermite” have caused a beam to project that far?
Show your math
A) Never in the history of high rise building fires, has a building collapsed due to fire.
B) In every controlled demolition in history, there has never been enough energy to throw out multi-ton steel beams. I never, ever, held the position that thermite alone did this, thus, I don't have to prove anything.
C) It is the job of YOU to prove the governments theory, that fire could cause such a preposterous thing to happen. I don't have to prove YOUR foolish conspiracy theory.
A) Never in the history of high rise building fires, has a building collapsed due to fire.
Never before in the history of the WTC have jets crashed into the buildings.
So you believe if a jet airliner should ever crash into a building again, it will likewise collapse, taking surrounding buildings with it?
What we know
A jet airline flew into each tower at high speed
Those airlines smashed huge hole in the building and created massive fires
People caught in the buildings were so terrified of the fires that they jumped rather than face the fires
Damage and intense fires caused TWO equally designed towers under identical circumstances to collapse
Prove anything else caused the collapse
Lawyers' Committee 'Names Names' in New 9/11 Grand Jury Filing
9/11: Finally the Truth Comes Out?
Ongoing trial at Guantanamo also.
Trial for Men Accused of Plotting 9/11 Attacks Is Set for 2021
The reason there are questions about the Pentagon is simple---But wait.....There’s more!
If you think the idea of the WTC being wired for a controlled demo is preposterous
Look at 9-11 truth claims about the Pentagon
Damage was not caused by an airliner being flown into the Pentagon, it was caused by a missile that was fired just as the airline was flying over. Then, the government scattered airline debris all over the site
Can’t make this shit up
why were all the cameras off ?
Which cameras were off?
And what could that possibly have to do with an airline hitting the Pentagon?
Do you believe the government spread aircraft debris around the Pentagon or not?
Come on 9-11 Truthers.......you got some Splaining to do
How did the airline debris get to the Pentagon crash site?
The reason there are questions about the Pentagon is simple---But wait.....There’s more!
If you think the idea of the WTC being wired for a controlled demo is preposterous
Look at 9-11 truth claims about the Pentagon
Damage was not caused by an airliner being flown into the Pentagon, it was caused by a missile that was fired just as the airline was flying over. Then, the government scattered airline debris all over the site
Can’t make this shit up
why were all the cameras off ?
Which cameras were off?
And what could that possibly have to do with an airline hitting the Pentagon?
Do you believe the government spread aircraft debris around the Pentagon or not?
Come on 9-11 Truthers.......you got some Splaining to do
How did the airline debris get to the Pentagon crash site?
And how did the bodies, still belted into airplane seats, get embedded in Pentagon rubble?
Dick Cheney sneak them in when no one was looking?
The reason there are questions about the Pentagon is simple---But wait.....There’s more!
If you think the idea of the WTC being wired for a controlled demo is preposterous
Look at 9-11 truth claims about the Pentagon
Damage was not caused by an airliner being flown into the Pentagon, it was caused by a missile that was fired just as the airline was flying over. Then, the government scattered airline debris all over the site
Can’t make this shit up
why were all the cameras off ?
Which cameras were off?
And what could that possibly have to do with an airline hitting the Pentagon?
Do you believe the government spread aircraft debris around the Pentagon or not?
Come on 9-11 Truthers.......you got some Splaining to do
How did the airline debris get to the Pentagon crash site?
And how did the bodies, still belted into airplane seats, get embedded in Pentagon rubble?
Dick Cheney sneak them in when no one was looking?
Ummmm......maybe they were on the plane when it crashed into the building
Question for you now.......how could anyone get a charred body whose DNA matched a passenger on that plane into the rubble of the Pentagon ?
How could anyone get the personal affects and IDs of passengers on that plane into the rubble?
You got some Splaining to do
