member
Pls trust in God
- Mar 14, 2012
- 1,823
- 426
The argument is moot because Israel is there and they have nuclear weapons. If the United States were to become a minor nation in the near future, it may get interesting in that region though.but there is NO Jewish right to ownership at all. NONE!
You don't seem to be very clear what you are arguing here. You, like many, are attempting to conflate private property ownership with sovereignty. You, like many, use this as a way to restrict Jewish rights at both ends of the candle, as it were. Because, apparently, you think there should be different rules for Jews. Sigh. Where have we heard that before?
So, to be clear:
You are arguing that the right to purchase property should be withheld from people who are Jewish?!
and/or
You are arguing that the right to self-determination should be withheld from people who are Jewish?
Wrong.
I am separately arguing both issues.
Jews have absolutely no legal right to any political control over Palestine at all, since Jews are almost entirely a minority of foreign illegal immigrants, and that any Jews were allowed to legally immigrate to Palestine on the promise they would never try to get involved rule or sovereignty.
Jews are not the natives nor the majority, in Israel or Palestine/Israel.
Jews have almost no legal right to any land or property, because they did not actually purchase any significant amount of land, unlike the Palestinians, who have valid deeds, titles, bill of sales, etc.
how'about a little "moot"-beer for you ?
"If the United States were to become a minor nation in the near future, it may get interesting in that region though..."
a snack with that beer ?