Mark Judge, Key Witness To Alleged Brett Kavanaugh Assault, Refuses To Testify

[Asclepias]

This was not part of the investigation d u h. Time's up.

You would have thought that since Feinstien knew about this in July the FBI would have been looking at it, I wonder why she withheld the information. LOL!

She said she withheld it because the Ford asked her to.

Then why did Ford tell her? Seems pointless. Ford say, Kavanaugh tried to rape me but don’t tell anyone? Is she a 6th grader? Come on, you make the accusation and stay anonymous? Tell when has that happened in this day an age? It is an accusation, Kavanaugh has a right to defend himself and face his accuser. That said Ford I believe, believes Kavenaugh attempted to rape her, however I believe she has a false memory, because a) it never came out until 2012 after a therapy session. b) she doesn’t know where it happened. c) she doesn’t know when it happened d) she doesn’t know who was there, other than Kavenaugh and Judge. e) she told no one before 2012, not even her husband because she said she didn’t remember. f) she has such clear detail of the event but no clear memory of where or when. g) she took a lie detector and passed without any other clear details. h) Kavenaugh has no recollection. I) Judge has no recollection. j) no one else has come forward with any recollection. k) her attorney is a Soros operative. l) Kavenaugh has no one else coming forward with accusations. m) she is unwilling to testify.

False memories are real, to the person who has them, however it doesn’t mean they actually happened. When you research such accusations and stories in the past, false memories follow a very similar pattern to hers.

You would have to ask Ford that. I would have to assume she wanted Feinstein to work extra hard to keep a sexual predator off the SC.

Absolutely no proof that Kavenaugh is a sexual predator, none what so ever. If her memory is false then I could see why she would not want Kavenaugh on the court, however there is absolutely no evidence, no witnesses and no time or place.

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

 

[Papageorgio]

You would have thought that since Feinstien knew about this in July the FBI would have been looking at it, I wonder why she withheld the information. LOL!

She said she withheld it because the Ford asked her to.

Then why did Ford tell her? Seems pointless. Ford say, Kavanaugh tried to rape me but don’t tell anyone? Is she a 6th grader? Come on, you make the accusation and stay anonymous? Tell when has that happened in this day an age? It is an accusation, Kavanaugh has a right to defend himself and face his accuser. That said Ford I believe, believes Kavenaugh attempted to rape her, however I believe she has a false memory, because a) it never came out until 2012 after a therapy session. b) she doesn’t know where it happened. c) she doesn’t know when it happened d) she doesn’t know who was there, other than Kavenaugh and Judge. e) she told no one before 2012, not even her husband because she said she didn’t remember. f) she has such clear detail of the event but no clear memory of where or when. g) she took a lie detector and passed without any other clear details. h) Kavenaugh has no recollection. I) Judge has no recollection. j) no one else has come forward with any recollection. k) her attorney is a Soros operative. l) Kavenaugh has no one else coming forward with accusations. m) she is unwilling to testify.

False memories are real, to the person who has them, however it doesn’t mean they actually happened. When you research such accusations and stories in the past, false memories follow a very similar pattern to hers.

You would have to ask Ford that. I would have to assume she wanted Feinstein to work extra hard to keep a sexual predator off the SC.

Absolutely no proof that Kavenaugh is a sexual predator, none what so ever. If her memory is false then I could see why she would not want Kavenaugh on the court, however there is absolutely no evidence, no witnesses and no time or place.

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

Who corroborated the story?

 

[Asclepias]

She said she withheld it because the Ford asked her to.

Then why did Ford tell her? Seems pointless. Ford say, Kavanaugh tried to rape me but don’t tell anyone? Is she a 6th grader? Come on, you make the accusation and stay anonymous? Tell when has that happened in this day an age? It is an accusation, Kavanaugh has a right to defend himself and face his accuser. That said Ford I believe, believes Kavenaugh attempted to rape her, however I believe she has a false memory, because a) it never came out until 2012 after a therapy session. b) she doesn’t know where it happened. c) she doesn’t know when it happened d) she doesn’t know who was there, other than Kavenaugh and Judge. e) she told no one before 2012, not even her husband because she said she didn’t remember. f) she has such clear detail of the event but no clear memory of where or when. g) she took a lie detector and passed without any other clear details. h) Kavenaugh has no recollection. I) Judge has no recollection. j) no one else has come forward with any recollection. k) her attorney is a Soros operative. l) Kavenaugh has no one else coming forward with accusations. m) she is unwilling to testify.

False memories are real, to the person who has them, however it doesn’t mean they actually happened. When you research such accusations and stories in the past, false memories follow a very similar pattern to hers.

You would have to ask Ford that. I would have to assume she wanted Feinstein to work extra hard to keep a sexual predator off the SC.

Absolutely no proof that Kavenaugh is a sexual predator, none what so ever. If her memory is false then I could see why she would not want Kavenaugh on the court, however there is absolutely no evidence, no witnesses and no time or place.

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

Who corroborated the story?

The woman that said she heard people talking about the attempted rape.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You would have thought that since Feinstien knew about this in July the FBI would have been looking at it, I wonder why she withheld the information. LOL!

She said she withheld it because the Ford asked her to.

Then why did Ford tell her? Seems pointless. Ford say, Kavanaugh tried to rape me but don’t tell anyone? Is she a 6th grader? Come on, you make the accusation and stay anonymous? Tell when has that happened in this day an age? It is an accusation, Kavanaugh has a right to defend himself and face his accuser. That said Ford I believe, believes Kavenaugh attempted to rape her, however I believe she has a false memory, because a) it never came out until 2012 after a therapy session. b) she doesn’t know where it happened. c) she doesn’t know when it happened d) she doesn’t know who was there, other than Kavenaugh and Judge. e) she told no one before 2012, not even her husband because she said she didn’t remember. f) she has such clear detail of the event but no clear memory of where or when. g) she took a lie detector and passed without any other clear details. h) Kavenaugh has no recollection. I) Judge has no recollection. j) no one else has come forward with any recollection. k) her attorney is a Soros operative. l) Kavenaugh has no one else coming forward with accusations. m) she is unwilling to testify.

False memories are real, to the person who has them, however it doesn’t mean they actually happened. When you research such accusations and stories in the past, false memories follow a very similar pattern to hers.

You would have to ask Ford that. I would have to assume she wanted Feinstein to work extra hard to keep a sexual predator off the SC.

Absolutely no proof that Kavenaugh is a sexual predator, none what so ever. If her memory is false then I could see why she would not want Kavenaugh on the court, however there is absolutely no evidence, no witnesses and no time or place.

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

By who?

 

[Asclepias]

She said she withheld it because the Ford asked her to.

Then why did Ford tell her? Seems pointless. Ford say, Kavanaugh tried to rape me but don’t tell anyone? Is she a 6th grader? Come on, you make the accusation and stay anonymous? Tell when has that happened in this day an age? It is an accusation, Kavanaugh has a right to defend himself and face his accuser. That said Ford I believe, believes Kavenaugh attempted to rape her, however I believe she has a false memory, because a) it never came out until 2012 after a therapy session. b) she doesn’t know where it happened. c) she doesn’t know when it happened d) she doesn’t know who was there, other than Kavenaugh and Judge. e) she told no one before 2012, not even her husband because she said she didn’t remember. f) she has such clear detail of the event but no clear memory of where or when. g) she took a lie detector and passed without any other clear details. h) Kavenaugh has no recollection. I) Judge has no recollection. j) no one else has come forward with any recollection. k) her attorney is a Soros operative. l) Kavenaugh has no one else coming forward with accusations. m) she is unwilling to testify.

False memories are real, to the person who has them, however it doesn’t mean they actually happened. When you research such accusations and stories in the past, false memories follow a very similar pattern to hers.

You would have to ask Ford that. I would have to assume she wanted Feinstein to work extra hard to keep a sexual predator off the SC.

Absolutely no proof that Kavenaugh is a sexual predator, none what so ever. If her memory is false then I could see why she would not want Kavenaugh on the court, however there is absolutely no evidence, no witnesses and no time or place.

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

By who?

see above.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Oh gee, that's not the same thing.

Do you need a link to a dictionary? Recant means to say your previous statement was false. She never said anything even close to that.

If she refused to come forward with it, it's the same thing. She threw it out there until she was asked about it. In other words, she made it up.

You see if she did go forward with it, the next question would be who did she hear this from? Since she made it up, she wouldn't be able to answer the question.

No its not the same thing. Only someone lacking in vocabulary would say its the same thing.

You are trying to Clintonize this. Go to the police department and tell them you witnessed an auto accident. When questioned about it, say you don't want to get involved. What's the difference between backing off your claim and saying you made it up?

"What's the difference between backing off your claim and saying you made it up?"

You just stated the difference. One is backing off your claim and the other is saying you made it up. Whats really killing your logic though is she hasnt backed off her claim at all. She just said she wasnt going to discuss it with the media. She was pretty specific about that.

It's the same thing. If you make a claim you don't want to prove, then you did make it up. Because she didn't use those exact words, it's not the same thing?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Then why did Ford tell her? Seems pointless. Ford say, Kavanaugh tried to rape me but don’t tell anyone? Is she a 6th grader? Come on, you make the accusation and stay anonymous? Tell when has that happened in this day an age? It is an accusation, Kavanaugh has a right to defend himself and face his accuser. That said Ford I believe, believes Kavenaugh attempted to rape her, however I believe she has a false memory, because a) it never came out until 2012 after a therapy session. b) she doesn’t know where it happened. c) she doesn’t know when it happened d) she doesn’t know who was there, other than Kavenaugh and Judge. e) she told no one before 2012, not even her husband because she said she didn’t remember. f) she has such clear detail of the event but no clear memory of where or when. g) she took a lie detector and passed without any other clear details. h) Kavenaugh has no recollection. I) Judge has no recollection. j) no one else has come forward with any recollection. k) her attorney is a Soros operative. l) Kavenaugh has no one else coming forward with accusations. m) she is unwilling to testify.

False memories are real, to the person who has them, however it doesn’t mean they actually happened. When you research such accusations and stories in the past, false memories follow a very similar pattern to hers.

You would have to ask Ford that. I would have to assume she wanted Feinstein to work extra hard to keep a sexual predator off the SC.

Absolutely no proof that Kavenaugh is a sexual predator, none what so ever. If her memory is false then I could see why she would not want Kavenaugh on the court, however there is absolutely no evidence, no witnesses and no time or place.

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

By who?

see above.

You talk about the use of words. Corroborating does not mean you heard something.

corroborate |kəˈräbəˌrāt| verb [ with obj. ]

confirm or give support to (a statement, theory, or finding): the witness had corroborated the boy's account of the attack.

 

[Asclepias]

Do you need a link to a dictionary? Recant means to say your previous statement was false. She never said anything even close to that.

If she refused to come forward with it, it's the same thing. She threw it out there until she was asked about it. In other words, she made it up.

You see if she did go forward with it, the next question would be who did she hear this from? Since she made it up, she wouldn't be able to answer the question.

No its not the same thing. Only someone lacking in vocabulary would say its the same thing.

You are trying to Clintonize this. Go to the police department and tell them you witnessed an auto accident. When questioned about it, say you don't want to get involved. What's the difference between backing off your claim and saying you made it up?

"What's the difference between backing off your claim and saying you made it up?"

You just stated the difference. One is backing off your claim and the other is saying you made it up. Whats really killing your logic though is she hasnt backed off her claim at all. She just said she wasnt going to discuss it with the media. She was pretty specific about that.

It's the same thing. If you make a claim you don't want to prove, then you did make it up. Because she didn't use those exact words, it's not the same thing?

Not its not the same thing. Maybe in your alternate reality its the same but among intelligent people we know that if you dont want to talk to the media then that has jack shit to do with the truthfulness of your claim.

 

[Papageorgio]

Then why did Ford tell her? Seems pointless. Ford say, Kavanaugh tried to rape me but don’t tell anyone? Is she a 6th grader? Come on, you make the accusation and stay anonymous? Tell when has that happened in this day an age? It is an accusation, Kavanaugh has a right to defend himself and face his accuser. That said Ford I believe, believes Kavenaugh attempted to rape her, however I believe she has a false memory, because a) it never came out until 2012 after a therapy session. b) she doesn’t know where it happened. c) she doesn’t know when it happened d) she doesn’t know who was there, other than Kavenaugh and Judge. e) she told no one before 2012, not even her husband because she said she didn’t remember. f) she has such clear detail of the event but no clear memory of where or when. g) she took a lie detector and passed without any other clear details. h) Kavenaugh has no recollection. I) Judge has no recollection. j) no one else has come forward with any recollection. k) her attorney is a Soros operative. l) Kavenaugh has no one else coming forward with accusations. m) she is unwilling to testify.

False memories are real, to the person who has them, however it doesn’t mean they actually happened. When you research such accusations and stories in the past, false memories follow a very similar pattern to hers.

You would have to ask Ford that. I would have to assume she wanted Feinstein to work extra hard to keep a sexual predator off the SC.

Absolutely no proof that Kavenaugh is a sexual predator, none what so ever. If her memory is false then I could see why she would not want Kavenaugh on the court, however there is absolutely no evidence, no witnesses and no time or place.

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

Who corroborated the story?

The woman that said she heard people talking about the attempted rape.

What is her name? Where was she when she heard the story? When did she hear it and what is the name of those people talking about it.

 

[Asclepias]

You would have to ask Ford that. I would have to assume she wanted Feinstein to work extra hard to keep a sexual predator off the SC.

Absolutely no proof that Kavenaugh is a sexual predator, none what so ever. If her memory is false then I could see why she would not want Kavenaugh on the court, however there is absolutely no evidence, no witnesses and no time or place.

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

By who?

see above.

You talk about the use of words. Corroborating does not mean you heard something.

corroborate |kəˈräbəˌrāt| verb [ with obj. ]

confirm or give support to (a statement, theory, or finding): the witness had corroborated the boy's account of the attack.

I didnt say it meant you heard something.

She specifically gave support to Ford not only by saying she heard of the incident, she actually spoke the word support when backing Ford up.

 

[OKTexas]

Not evidence, probable cause. There is probable cause to say she is intentionally interfering with governmental administration, searching for evidence of a possible conspiracy with others to that end wouldn't be unreasonable.

.

Whats the probable cause?

Oh I don't know, maybe the FACT that she's currently interfering with governmental administration. And she has already engaged the services and assistance of others.

.

How is she interfering with governmental administration? Please be specific and cite applicable laws that demonstrate what she is doing.

Is your google broke? Look it up yourself.

.

I cant look up something that doesnt exist. At least give me a link.

These are charges one of your heroes laid against some Russians, and this is exactly what Ford, her conspirators and the commiecrats are doing.

“impairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful functions of government”

Mueller charges 13 Russians with interfering in US election to help Trump

.

 

[Asclepias]

You would have to ask Ford that. I would have to assume she wanted Feinstein to work extra hard to keep a sexual predator off the SC.

Absolutely no proof that Kavenaugh is a sexual predator, none what so ever. If her memory is false then I could see why she would not want Kavenaugh on the court, however there is absolutely no evidence, no witnesses and no time or place.

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

Who corroborated the story?

The woman that said she heard people talking about the attempted rape.

What is her name? Where was she when she heard the story? When did she hear it and what is the name of those people talking about it.

You'd have to ask her most of that information. Actually the FBI should. I think her last name is Miranda

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Then why did Ford tell her? Seems pointless. Ford say, Kavanaugh tried to rape me but don’t tell anyone? Is she a 6th grader? Come on, you make the accusation and stay anonymous? Tell when has that happened in this day an age? It is an accusation, Kavanaugh has a right to defend himself and face his accuser. That said Ford I believe, believes Kavenaugh attempted to rape her, however I believe she has a false memory, because a) it never came out until 2012 after a therapy session. b) she doesn’t know where it happened. c) she doesn’t know when it happened d) she doesn’t know who was there, other than Kavenaugh and Judge. e) she told no one before 2012, not even her husband because she said she didn’t remember. f) she has such clear detail of the event but no clear memory of where or when. g) she took a lie detector and passed without any other clear details. h) Kavenaugh has no recollection. I) Judge has no recollection. j) no one else has come forward with any recollection. k) her attorney is a Soros operative. l) Kavenaugh has no one else coming forward with accusations. m) she is unwilling to testify.

False memories are real, to the person who has them, however it doesn’t mean they actually happened. When you research such accusations and stories in the past, false memories follow a very similar pattern to hers.

You would have to ask Ford that. I would have to assume she wanted Feinstein to work extra hard to keep a sexual predator off the SC.

Absolutely no proof that Kavenaugh is a sexual predator, none what so ever. If her memory is false then I could see why she would not want Kavenaugh on the court, however there is absolutely no evidence, no witnesses and no time or place.

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

Who corroborated the story?

The woman that said she heard people talking about the attempted rape.

I heard that Obama was at the airport having sex with other men in the stalls. Does that "corroborate" that he did it?

 

[Asclepias]

Whats the probable cause?

Oh I don't know, maybe the FACT that she's currently interfering with governmental administration. And she has already engaged the services and assistance of others.

.

How is she interfering with governmental administration? Please be specific and cite applicable laws that demonstrate what she is doing.

Is your google broke? Look it up yourself.

.

I cant look up something that doesnt exist. At least give me a link.

These are charges one of your heroes laid against some Russians, and this is exactly what Ford, her conspirators and the commiecrats are doing.

“impairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful functions of government”

Mueller charges 13 Russians with interfering in US election to help Trump

.

Yeah but you havent shown me how Ford has done any of that?

 

[Asclepias]

You would have to ask Ford that. I would have to assume she wanted Feinstein to work extra hard to keep a sexual predator off the SC.

Absolutely no proof that Kavenaugh is a sexual predator, none what so ever. If her memory is false then I could see why she would not want Kavenaugh on the court, however there is absolutely no evidence, no witnesses and no time or place.

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

Who corroborated the story?

The woman that said she heard people talking about the attempted rape.

I heard that Obama was at the airport having sex with other men in the stalls. Does that "corroborate" that he did it?

Did someone else make that same claim prior to you making this statement? If so that would corroborate the first claim.

FYI. I can tell by the context in which you used the word corroborate you are very unfamiliar with it.

 

[Papageorgio]

Absolutely no proof that Kavenaugh is a sexual predator, none what so ever. If her memory is false then I could see why she would not want Kavenaugh on the court, however there is absolutely no evidence, no witnesses and no time or place.

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

By who?

see above.

You talk about the use of words. Corroborating does not mean you heard something.

corroborate |kəˈräbəˌrāt| verb [ with obj. ]

confirm or give support to (a statement, theory, or finding): the witness had corroborated the boy's account of the attack.

I didnt say it meant you heard something.

She specifically gave support to Ford not only by saying she heard of the incident, she actually spoke the word support when backing Ford up.

Who said? What is her name? When did she hear of the incident? Because Kavanaugh, Judge and now PJ Smyth who Ford alleges was there denies being there.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Absolutely no proof that Kavenaugh is a sexual predator, none what so ever. If her memory is false then I could see why she would not want Kavenaugh on the court, however there is absolutely no evidence, no witnesses and no time or place.

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

By who?

see above.

You talk about the use of words. Corroborating does not mean you heard something.

corroborate |kəˈräbəˌrāt| verb [ with obj. ]

confirm or give support to (a statement, theory, or finding): the witness had corroborated the boy's account of the attack.

I didnt say it meant you heard something.

She specifically gave support to Ford not only by saying she heard of the incident, she actually spoke the word support when backing Ford up.

You can't support somebody by something you "heard" you can only support somebody by being a witness to something.

 

[Asclepias]

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

By who?

see above.

You talk about the use of words. Corroborating does not mean you heard something.

corroborate |kəˈräbəˌrāt| verb [ with obj. ]

confirm or give support to (a statement, theory, or finding): the witness had corroborated the boy's account of the attack.

I didnt say it meant you heard something.

She specifically gave support to Ford not only by saying she heard of the incident, she actually spoke the word support when backing Ford up.

You can't support somebody by something you "heard" you can only support somebody by being a witness to something.

Thats patently false. You obviously dont know what you are talking about.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Absolutely no proof that Kavenaugh is a sexual predator, none what so ever. If her memory is false then I could see why she would not want Kavenaugh on the court, however there is absolutely no evidence, no witnesses and no time or place.

There doesnt have to be proof for someone to make an accusation. The problem comes when the story is corroborated by someone else which it was.

Who corroborated the story?

The woman that said she heard people talking about the attempted rape.

I heard that Obama was at the airport having sex with other men in the stalls. Does that "corroborate" that he did it?

Did someone else make that same claim prior to you making this statement? If so that would corroborate the first claim.

FYI. I can tell by the context in which you used the word corroborate you are very unfamiliar with it.

Good, you try to use that in the court of law and see what happens. What a joke. I heard something of what somebody else claims. Don't try to go to law school.

 

[OKTexas]

while I was pointing out an example of how easily rumors can get started

Which is a red herring, because this is not a "rumor", but rather an explicit claim by the alleged victim.

For it not to be a rumor it would need to be substantiated by facts like time and place, I haven't seen any indication those facts are available, so yeah, it's a rumor. Who started it is irrelevant.

.

You obviously need a dictionary.

I got one:

ru·mor
[ˈro͞omər]
NOUN

1. a currently circulating story or report of uncertain or doubtful truth.
   "they were investigating rumors of a massacre" ·
   gossip · hearsay · talk · tittle-tattle · the grapevine ·
   reportedly · reputedly ·
   [more]

I'd say that fits the Ford story pretty well.

.

You need someone holding your hand and helping you with the correct terminology.

ac·cu·sa·tion
ˌakyəˈzāSH(ə)n/
noun

1. a charge or claim that someone has done something illegal or wrong.

Id say instead of a rumor we should label it what it is. An accusation.

Now all you need is the word "unfounded" and you'll have a more accurate picture. LMAO

.