Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She was investigated by the FBI and neither the FBI or DOJ thought her actions warranted criminal prosecution. Both Obama and Trump appointed directors had the opportunity and none took it so it’s over. She was called out by Comey for her actions, may have lost the election because of it. It is what it is. What do you think? 50 consecutive life sentences?What penalty should Clinton be getting?
What penalty should Clinton be getting?She was investigated by the FBI and neither the FBI or DOJ thought her actions warranted criminal prosecution. Both Obama and Trump appointed directors had the opportunity and none took it so it’s over. She was called out by Comey for her actions, may have lost the election because of it. It is what it is. What do you think? 50 consecutive life sentences?
Clinton already got it, NOTHING.What penalty should Clinton be getting?
Asked and answered. Her case has been investigated and is now over. So nothing. Now your turn. What penalty do you think she should get.What penalty should Clinton be getting?
Levin is in contention, for the worst of the worst.
Levin had always been among the looniest, of the looney.
So what penalty do you think Clinton should get?What penalty should Clinton be getting?
You couldn't wipe his shoes.
You are but you don’t think you are. Sad really..I'd challenge you to prove that I'm a hardcore lefty, a "progbot", but I know how you guys run whenever I do that.
Levin isn't even twice as smart as you.On his worst day, he is thousands of times more intelligent and honest than you are, Smokin’ DOPE.
And yet you can't list off my positions on the issues. You're ignorant.You are but you don’t think you are. Sad really..
Stupid topic Leo. Who gives a shit whether Mac is a hardcore lefty or not. Sounds like you’re diverting from the topic to try and get personal. That’s weak.You are but you don’t think you are. Sad really..
Already answered this many times.So what penalty do you think Clinton should get?
I didn’t see your answer. After I had answered and you asked again I repeated my answer. Is a quick and easy thing. What do you think should be done with Clinton?Already answered this many times.
Trump won.
Levin was spot on.
Already answered this many times.
Trump won.
Levin was spot on.
Didn’t ask for a list of whoever he supports. His scholarship is awesome. The clarity of his thinking is remarkable.Levin isn't even twice as smart as you.
And you think Trump is a genius, because he told you he was.
Levin supported U.S. Representative Mo Brooks in his campaign in the 2017 Alabama special election against incumbent Luther Strange, who had received a temporary appointment earlier that year.
Levin strongly defended former EPA head Scott Pruitt while he was under a dozen separate ethics investigations. Levin said Pruitt's "policies on the whole have been outstanding," and "I don't throw good people under the bus because the left targets them."
In 2009, Levin described as "absolutely right" the statement by Sarah Palin that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) includes death panels to decide whether elderly people or sick children were worthy of medical care.
In 2011, a caller to Levin's show, claiming to be a neurosurgeon, said that the Department of Health and Human Services had issued a document saying that people over age 70 would not be allowed to receive medical treatments. Levin said to the caller, "so Sarah Palin was right."
The call was later revealed to be a hoax and the death panel claims were revealed to be false.
In late 2013, Levin said there were similarities between a gathering of "hand-picked" supporters of the Affordable Care Act chosen by the Obama administration to Nazi Sturmabteilung or "Brownshirts" drawing comparisons of the propaganda techniques of the two groups.
Following the 2020 presidential election, as all significant media organizations reported Joe Biden had won, Levin told his radio audience, the Democrats were "stealing the election". He insisted on Twitter to his 2.4 million followers: "there's lots of evidence of voter fraud and election screw-ups."
Like every other Trump humper, no evidence and not ONE, was willing to testify, under oath.
Only to the delusional.Didn’t ask for a list of whoever he supports. His scholarship is awesome. The clarity of his thinking is remarkable.
Try to stay on topic, Smokin’_Crack
Lol, what makes this fun is that every lefty on this board knows the answer to this, including you.Trump won what?
