- Sep 16, 2012
- 57,881
- 51,445
- 3,605
I see all he posts about is the World Economic Forum's technocracy agenda's propaganda of this "plague." It would not surprise me if he is a global bureaucrat, somehow associated with the academia, or world government, same as Crick. He only posts that same propaganda, regardless or whether it is true or not. Crick only posts that AGW crap from those same quacks at the IPCC and the UN, which has the same agenda as global oligarchs and the old world aristocracy which has no use for natural rights or America's Constitution.And a complete sycophant to what the Govt tells him to do.You're right, he is a colossal liar.Nope. Sweden didn’t wear masks…they are fine. You’re a liar.NO. . . the reason it ran into a wall in Asia. . . was because many of these folks had already been exposed to SARS.This is why covid ran into a wall when everyone in asia immediately masked up and social distanced.
Anyone exposed to SARS? Is immune to COVID.
". . . One antibody (named S309) potently neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV pseudoviruses as well as authentic SARS-CoV-2, by engaging the receptor-binding domain of the S glycoprotein. Using cryo-electron microscopy and binding assays, we show that S309 recognizes an epitope containing a glycan that is conserved within the Sarbecovirus subgenus, without competing with receptor attachment. Antibody cocktails that include S309 in combination with other antibodies that we identified further enhanced SARS-CoV-2 neutralization, and may limit the emergence of neutralization-escape mutants. . . "
If You've Had This Illness, You May Be Immune to COVID-19
There were only 8,000+ cases of SARS around the globe. Most asian countries were not even affected. There were over 5,000 cases in china. To say that Asia was protected because of those 8,000 WORLD cases, which we haven't seen another outbreak of for 17 years now, is rather comical. No, they were protected with one simple thing, masks.
They are both America's enemies.
If. . .indeed, these aren't the same person. . . which, of course, would be against forum rules.
Crick
www.usmessageboard.com