Mayor Bill de Blasio punishes children for OVERT POLITICAL GAIN

[

you dont know what you're talking about as usual. i doubt you know anybody that goes to a charter school or has children in one. Charter schools are WAY better than the failing, violent public schools in places like New York City

this is one the Left is going to lose; because many minorities have their children in them.

Then you make the public schools better, you don't let a few rich corporatiosn suck out needed resources to benefit a few, when 75% of them do no better and 30% of them do worse.

Sorry, dude, the Snake Oil Sale is over on Charter School Ripoffs.
 
Let me point out a few things. Eva Markowitz is a Democrat. She wants preferential treatment. She wants special treatment v other charter schools. Why did Bill de Blasio approve other charter school co-locations?

I don't care how many ways this woman tries to spin it.
 
Our public schools turn out 'children of the corn' who are so stupid they pray to the scarecrow that they put there themselves to frighten away the well educated, law abiding 'children of the voucher' that threatens the existence of the union of undereducated, low information, teachers of 'progressive liberalism, socialism, and marxism'.
 
Read the article about the re-location part.

An overt fascist supporting an overt fascist mayor. Not surprised.

So I have a great business idea but in order for it to work the government has to let me use one of its buildings, rent free. Am I approved?

I have an even more insane idea. How about we require that you, and every other person, purchase a product through force of law. THEN we can look at the competition and point out that selling their product is damn near impossible since customers have to purchase the product TWICE.

Considering that parents are forced to purchase public education (and not refunded a dime of that if they pay for private school) it is a wonder that private education even exists at all. The sheer fact that people willingly pay twice just to get out of public schools shows just how crappy the public product really is.

The ONE thing that the lefts refusal to allow any choice does is trap inner city students in schools that do not work and are dangerous to attend. Things like charter schools, vouchers and other programs allow those trapped students who really want access to a better education an outlet to actually achieve that. The left fights that desperately though because it is not about getting good education – it’s about stopping ANYONE from getting ahead.

The poor are fucked in this system because you have locked them into the worst education institutes in the entire country and then DEMAND that they not have any option to go anywhere else. The left fight for the poor? Please, education is the ONE place where you can actually help them break out of that poverty and it is fought each and every step without a single concrete reason.

You wont see the LOLberals here addressing this post. It completely tyurns their typical dishonest, nonsense arguments into shit smear. Because, this is correct.
 
LOLberals hate competition. Unless it is internet speed. Then they want more capitalism.

:lmao:

Liars and hypocrites.
 
LOLberals hate competition. Unless it is internet speed. Then they want more capitalism.

:lmao:

Liars and hypocrites.

perhaps you should just acknowledge that you don't understand the issue and stop randing about liberals.

oh wait... that would require actual thought.

And here's the resident moron with a typically moronic post.
We do understand the issue. The issue is that libs want to deny poor kids an equal opportunity to get a good education so they can get off the gov't plantation.

Why do you hate poor black children?
 
LOLberals hate competition. Unless it is internet speed. Then they want more capitalism.

:lmao:

Liars and hypocrites.

perhaps you should just acknowledge that you don't understand the issue and stop randing about liberals.

oh wait... that would require actual thought.

My thoughts were already put down by another poster. The post LOLberals like you WONT address because it steamrolls your bullshit talking points, lies and hypocrisy.
 
How dare my tax dollars be used to fund private schools. If you want to have private education raise your own damn money.

How dare my tax dollars be used to fund government schools. If you want public schools, then raise your own damn money.

we do. they're called taxes.

now run along.

If you object to vouchers on the basis that they use tax money, then you object to government schools on the same grounds. Apparently that went right over your head.
 
Charter schools and choice are a good idea. The fight over charter schools tends to be about them being a way to undermine the power of the unions. Unionize charter school teachers, make their budget reflect the cost of the building, and put them on equal footing with other public schools and then the choice process can work.

The whole point of choice is to create a market like environment. If that market is inherently imbalanced due to one side being subsidized over the other or if it is just about union v non-union teachers it really isn't creating the market conditions intended.

Republicans are supposed to want good market conditions. They have to choose what is more important, union breaking or market conditions. Hiding behind one to do the other is BS.
 
Unionizing the charter schools teachers ensures that they perform like public schools. Expensive, and yet the results are an embarrassment.
 
Unionizing the charter schools teachers ensures that they perform like public schools. Expensive, and yet the results are an embarrassment.

If you believe that then just be honest about it and fight teacher unions openly and stop hiding behind charter schools and choice.

I don't agree with your opinion but I have more respect for someone being open with an opinion than someone hiding their agenda.

I personally believe in market conditions enough to support unionized charter schools.
 
Fighting unions and supporting charter schools is one and the same, and it's way out there in the open.

"unionized charter schools" is an oxymoron.

Everybody, EVERYBODY knows unions are corrupt, and liberalism supports unions because "liberal" itself has become corrupt by theft of definition of the word.

When that became obvious to most people, the liberals changed their name (label) back to "progressives" which they changed to "liberals" in the "Wilson" era, and had to change again....because they can't tell you who, and what they really are.....Marxists.
 

Forum List

Back
Top