Rinata
Gold Member
- Oct 5, 2009
- 6,790
- 973
- 153
Read carefully what I wrote.....Beck's back peddling and gloss over's come AFTER all of his incendiary blatherings and mean spirited, ultra conservative paranoid ratnings. It's like someone consistently taking a piss on your front lawn and then making all types of apologies afterwards...yet they continue to piss on your front lawn.
Glenn hasn't been backpedalling at all. In order to accept your claims we have to ignore what Glenn actually says and talks about.
You believe MediaMatters because they say what you want to hear. "Truth" has nothing to do with it. They have their agenda, and are not above distortion and fabrication to bring it about.Sorry Dave, but avoiding content because you dislike the politics of the source does not automatically make your assertions correct. Bottom line: one must have the courage to read ALL information available in order to determine the truth. If you cannot disprove what Media Matters is printing, then all the sour grapes in the world won't change the facts contained. In short, ALL the source material I provided proves Beck to be a liar....period. If YOU can logically and factually disprove what I sourced, then have at it. If not, then you're just spitting in the wind.
As for Olberman....YOU need to PROVE your assertion, as I did.
As for Olbermann...you wouldn't accept anything I could show you, so why should I bother?
Media Matters DOCUMENTS what it writes...that means it provides ORIGINAL source material for the subject in question. This is how they are able to point out Beck's lies and distortions. Mind you, opinion is one thing, but when Beck rants on specifics, that seals his fate to be exposed as a phony by folk like Media Matters. Even Beck himself admits to NOT doing proper research and being informed on the subjects he rants about.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/media/126924-media-matter-blames-beck-31.html#post2611619
Here's the thing Dave...it is YOU who have demonstrated here that it's not about FACTS, but about what YOU WANT TO BELIEVE. That is why you cannot and will not discuss the details that Media Matters brings up, Dave...because to do so would mean honestly confronting the facts and then trying to logically defend Beck and your belief in what he asserts. Bottom line: you know you can't logically and/or factually defend Beck.
Finally, your last accusation is utter nonsense. As the chronology of the posts shows, I have readily provided proof for discussion of what I state. YOU HAVE NOT. Sorry Dave, but you can't bluff your way past me when there's a recorded record of what has transpired to contradict and disprove you.
I see you haven't been around here long but you catch on quickly!!! You'll see that Dave and his numbnut pals NEVER care about facts. They are uninformed and ignorant. And if God Himself came down and presented them with the truth, they still would say it was a lie. They don't want to know the truth.