Meet the New Muslim Mayor of London:

[Mindful]

At a time when Europe is reeling from reports of Muslims refugees running amok everywhere they go, Londoners have quietly voted in a Muslim to be their mayor. Lahore Karahi is the first ever Muslim to be elected as mayor of London and possibly the first minority. Considering that his opponent, a conservative snob, tried to tie hm to Islamic extremists, the taste of victory is even more satisfying.

The story broke early this morning but, unless I missed it, not a peep or post from the news hounds who don't miss a thing over at USMB. Yes, the eerie silence is quite telling. Its as if the RW crowd is watching from the shadows thinking their world is crumbling. EGADS! Whats next... Will one of the Royals marry a... ( the unthinkable)????

First mayor of London with a Fatwa on his head.

First mayor or London who has only had children with one woman who was his wife.

First mayor of London who hasn't been divorced.

And all they talk about is that he's a Muslim.

Admirable.

But he's had some dodgy connections.

Well the Bush's had the Saudi royal family, now that's dodgy.

So who is dodgy for this guy? Corbyn?

Sadiq Khan defended the 9/11 killer Zacarias Moussaoui, and called moderate Muslims “Uncle Toms”.

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

Bush and the Saudis have nothing to do with it.

 

[frigidweirdo]

"Uncle Tom" is a pretty racist thing to say, and nasty too when describing Muslims who are trying to moderate Islam and make it less dangerous and obnoxious to the outside world. I predict that this new mayor will be a total disaster for London, and the world. And don't think that the mayor of a city of 8.5 million people can't harm the interests of the United States, he certainly can.

Why do you think he'll be a disaster? Because he's a Muslim?

Ken Livingstone, also know as "Red Ken" is also a member of the Labour Party. If many on the right knew much about the Labour Party, they'd call them all a bunch of Communists. They're not. But "Red Ken" is. He's on the left of the Labour Party, and the left of the Labour Party has Communists in it.

Ken Livingstone - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here's what wikipedia says about him: "Supporters lauded his efforts to improve rights for women, LGBT people, and ethnic minorities in London, but critics accused him of cronyism and antisemitism and lambasted his connections to Islamists, Marxists, and Irish republicans."

So, "Red Ken" is probably more of a supporter of Islamic groups that might be questionable in the west than Khan is.

Boris Johnson has been described to have "an ideological emptiness beneath the staunch Tory exterior" and a "opportunistic – some might say pragmatic – approach to politics".

Basically like Trump. The winning is more important than anything else.

 

[frigidweirdo]

At a time when Europe is reeling from reports of Muslims refugees running amok everywhere they go, Londoners have quietly voted in a Muslim to be their mayor. Lahore Karahi is the first ever Muslim to be elected as mayor of London and possibly the first minority. Considering that his opponent, a conservative snob, tried to tie hm to Islamic extremists, the taste of victory is even more satisfying.

The story broke early this morning but, unless I missed it, not a peep or post from the news hounds who don't miss a thing over at USMB. Yes, the eerie silence is quite telling. Its as if the RW crowd is watching from the shadows thinking their world is crumbling. EGADS! Whats next... Will one of the Royals marry a... ( the unthinkable)????

First mayor of London with a Fatwa on his head.

First mayor or London who has only had children with one woman who was his wife.

First mayor of London who hasn't been divorced.

And all they talk about is that he's a Muslim.

Admirable.

But he's had some dodgy connections.

Well the Bush's had the Saudi royal family, now that's dodgy.

So who is dodgy for this guy? Corbyn?

Sadiq Khan defended the 9/11 killer Zacarias Moussaoui, and called moderate Muslims “Uncle Toms”.

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

Bush and the Saudis have nothing to do with it.

I'm not sure much of this is true. Type in this stuff and what comes up? Conservative Party sites, and articles from people like Pamella Geller
Muslim Anti-Semite Elected London Mayor Jihad Khan Defended 9/11 Terrorists

She starts with "his is part of the Islamization of Britain. Is anyone really surprised? The UK banned me from the country. It is already acting like a de facto Islamic state."

Well, as if we can't see her bias on the table from the first sentence.

Tories step up attempts to link Sadiq Khan to extremists

This is from a proper source, the first I came across.

Seems they linked the new mayor with Suliman Gani because, well, because Suliman Gani lives in Khan's old constituency.
Well that proves it then, doesn't it?

As for Moussaoui

"Goldsmith said Khan “chose to defend” Zacarias Moussaoui, one of the terrorists involved in the 9/11 attacks. Khan said he never represented him and his firm had consulted on his defence."

So, Khan didn't represent him. Or is there evidence that he did?
Moussaoui was tried in the US, I doubt Khan practiced law in the US, so this would be a little difficult. That the company he worked for was consulted on this case is just what law companies do.

What Khan has done in his time as a lawyer is:

• Bubbins vs The United Kingdom (European Court of Human Rights – shooting of an unarmed individual by police marksmen)[11]
• HSU and Thompson v Met Police (wrongful arrest/police damages)[12]
• Reeves v Met Police (duty of care to prisoners)[13]
• Murray v CAB (discrimination)[14]
• Ahmed v University of Oxford (racial discrimination against a student)[15]
• Dr Jadhav v Secretary of State for Health (racial discrimination in the employment of Indian doctors by the health service)[16]
• CI Logan v Met Police (racial discrimination)[17]
• Supt Dizaei v Met Police (police damages, discrimination)[18]
• Inquest into the death of David Rocky Bennett (use of restraints)[19]
• Lead solicitor on Mayday demonstration 2001 test case litigation (Human Rights Act)[20]
• Farrakhan v Home Secretary (Human Rights Act)[21]
• In February 2000, Khan represented a group of Kurdish actors who were arrested by Metropolitan Police during a rehearsal of the Harold Pinter play Mountain Language, securing £150,000 in damages for the group for wrongful arrest and the trauma caused by their arrest.[22]
• McDowell and Taylor v Met Police: Leroy McDowell and Wayne Taylor successfully sued the Metropolitan Police for assault and false imprisonment.[23]

As taken from Wikipedia.

It's all very easy to jump on the mistruths, half truths, and twists that have been made of this guy, but if there were anything serious, he'd not have been elected mayor in the first place.

 

[frigidweirdo]

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

Really?

In which case, and in which country?

Khan is still a British citizen, and still practices law in the UK, Farrakhan is American and lives in American. Why the hell would Khan be his defense lawyer? And did Farrakhan need a lawyer? For what?

 

[Mindful]

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

Really?

In which case, and in which country?

Khan is still a British citizen, and still practices law in the UK, Farrakhan is American and lives in American. Why the hell would Khan be his defense lawyer? And did Farrakhan need a lawyer? For what?

In 2002, Khan defended Louis Farrakhan, who was seeking to overturn his ban on entering Britain.

 

[Mindful]

At a time when Europe is reeling from reports of Muslims refugees running amok everywhere they go, Londoners have quietly voted in a Muslim to be their mayor. Lahore Karahi is the first ever Muslim to be elected as mayor of London and possibly the first minority. Considering that his opponent, a conservative snob, tried to tie hm to Islamic extremists, the taste of victory is even more satisfying.

The story broke early this morning but, unless I missed it, not a peep or post from the news hounds who don't miss a thing over at USMB. Yes, the eerie silence is quite telling. Its as if the RW crowd is watching from the shadows thinking their world is crumbling. EGADS! Whats next... Will one of the Royals marry a... ( the unthinkable)????

First mayor of London with a Fatwa on his head.

First mayor or London who has only had children with one woman who was his wife.

First mayor of London who hasn't been divorced.

And all they talk about is that he's a Muslim.

Admirable.

But he's had some dodgy connections.

Well the Bush's had the Saudi royal family, now that's dodgy.

So who is dodgy for this guy? Corbyn?

Sadiq Khan defended the 9/11 killer Zacarias Moussaoui, and called moderate Muslims “Uncle Toms”.

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

Bush and the Saudis have nothing to do with it.

I'm not sure much of this is true. Type in this stuff and what comes up? Conservative Party sites, and articles from people like Pamella Geller
Muslim Anti-Semite Elected London Mayor Jihad Khan Defended 9/11 Terrorists

She starts with "his is part of the Islamization of Britain. Is anyone really surprised? The UK banned me from the country. It is already acting like a de facto Islamic state."

Well, as if we can't see her bias on the table from the first sentence.

Tories step up attempts to link Sadiq Khan to extremists

This is from a proper source, the first I came across.

Seems they linked the new mayor with Suliman Gani because, well, because Suliman Gani lives in Khan's old constituency.
Well that proves it then, doesn't it?

As for Moussaoui

"Goldsmith said Khan “chose to defend” Zacarias Moussaoui, one of the terrorists involved in the 9/11 attacks. Khan said he never represented him and his firm had consulted on his defence."

So, Khan didn't represent him. Or is there evidence that he did?
Moussaoui was tried in the US, I doubt Khan practiced law in the US, so this would be a little difficult. That the company he worked for was consulted on this case is just what law companies do.

What Khan has done in his time as a lawyer is:

• Bubbins vs The United Kingdom (European Court of Human Rights – shooting of an unarmed individual by police marksmen)[11]
• HSU and Thompson v Met Police (wrongful arrest/police damages)[12]
• Reeves v Met Police (duty of care to prisoners)[13]
• Murray v CAB (discrimination)[14]
• Ahmed v University of Oxford (racial discrimination against a student)[15]
• Dr Jadhav v Secretary of State for Health (racial discrimination in the employment of Indian doctors by the health service)[16]
• CI Logan v Met Police (racial discrimination)[17]
• Supt Dizaei v Met Police (police damages, discrimination)[18]
• Inquest into the death of David Rocky Bennett (use of restraints)[19]
• Lead solicitor on Mayday demonstration 2001 test case litigation (Human Rights Act)[20]
• Farrakhan v Home Secretary (Human Rights Act)[21]
• In February 2000, Khan represented a group of Kurdish actors who were arrested by Metropolitan Police during a rehearsal of the Harold Pinter play Mountain Language, securing £150,000 in damages for the group for wrongful arrest and the trauma caused by their arrest.[22]
• McDowell and Taylor v Met Police: Leroy McDowell and Wayne Taylor successfully sued the Metropolitan Police for assault and false imprisonment.[23]

As taken from Wikipedia.

It's all very easy to jump on the mistruths, half truths, and twists that have been made of this guy, but if there were anything serious, he'd not have been elected mayor in the first place.

Is this a three way argument?

You, me, and wiki?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

At a time when Europe is reeling from reports of Muslims refugees running amok everywhere they go, Londoners have quietly voted in a Muslim to be their mayor. Lahore Karahi is the first ever Muslim to be elected as mayor of London and possibly the first minority. Considering that his opponent, a conservative snob, tried to tie hm to Islamic extremists, the taste of victory is even more satisfying.

The story broke early this morning but, unless I missed it, not a peep or post from the news hounds who don't miss a thing over at USMB. Yes, the eerie silence is quite telling. Its as if the RW crowd is watching from the shadows thinking their world is crumbling. EGADS! Whats next... Will one of the Royals marry a... ( the unthinkable)????

First mayor of London with a Fatwa on his head.

First mayor or London who has only had children with one woman who was his wife.

First mayor of London who hasn't been divorced.

And all they talk about is that he's a Muslim.

Admirable.

But he's had some dodgy connections.

Well the Bush's had the Saudi royal family, now that's dodgy.

So who is dodgy for this guy? Corbyn?

Sadiq Khan defended the 9/11 killer Zacarias Moussaoui, and called moderate Muslims “Uncle Toms”.

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

Bush and the Saudis have nothing to do with it.

London rejected this type of campaign. You need to think of a new strategy.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

Really?

In which case, and in which country?

Khan is still a British citizen, and still practices law in the UK, Farrakhan is American and lives in American. Why the hell would Khan be his defense lawyer? And did Farrakhan need a lawyer? For what?

In 2002, Khan defended Louis Farrakhan, who was seeking to overturn his ban on entering Britain.

I thought that everybody was entitled to legal representation ?

 

[Mindful]

At a time when Europe is reeling from reports of Muslims refugees running amok everywhere they go, Londoners have quietly voted in a Muslim to be their mayor. Lahore Karahi is the first ever Muslim to be elected as mayor of London and possibly the first minority. Considering that his opponent, a conservative snob, tried to tie hm to Islamic extremists, the taste of victory is even more satisfying.

The story broke early this morning but, unless I missed it, not a peep or post from the news hounds who don't miss a thing over at USMB. Yes, the eerie silence is quite telling. Its as if the RW crowd is watching from the shadows thinking their world is crumbling. EGADS! Whats next... Will one of the Royals marry a... ( the unthinkable)????

First mayor of London with a Fatwa on his head.

First mayor or London who has only had children with one woman who was his wife.

First mayor of London who hasn't been divorced.

And all they talk about is that he's a Muslim.

Admirable.

But he's had some dodgy connections.

Well the Bush's had the Saudi royal family, now that's dodgy.

So who is dodgy for this guy? Corbyn?

Sadiq Khan defended the 9/11 killer Zacarias Moussaoui, and called moderate Muslims “Uncle Toms”.

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

Bush and the Saudis have nothing to do with it.

London rejected this type of campaign. You need to think of a new strategy.

It was just a matter of time you showed up. With the same old same old.

You need a new strategy. Strategy for what?

 

[Alex.]

Uncle Khan?

 

[Mindful]

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

Really?

In which case, and in which country?

Khan is still a British citizen, and still practices law in the UK, Farrakhan is American and lives in American. Why the hell would Khan be his defense lawyer? And did Farrakhan need a lawyer? For what?

In 2002, Khan defended Louis Farrakhan, who was seeking to overturn his ban on entering Britain.

I thought that everybody was entitled to legal representation ?

That's not the issue. Are you dim? Or merely dyslexic?

Frigid was questioning the British-American legal connection between the two protagonists.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The OP must have missed the fact that we already had a thread about this turd.
And speaking of him, he's already being an asshole:

London's new Muslim mayor condemns 'Trump-style' attacks

London (AFP) - London's new Muslim mayor Sadiq Khan accused Prime Minister David Cameron on Sunday of using "Donald Trump playbook" tactics to try to divide communities in a bid to prevent his election.

The day after being sworn in with a promise to be "mayor for all Londoners", the Labour lawmaker condemned Cameron's Conservatives for trying to link him to Islamic extremists during the election campaign.

"They used fear and innuendo to try to turn different ethnic and religious groups against each other -- something straight out of the Donald Trump playbook," Khan wrote in The Observer newspaper.

"Londoners deserved better and I hope it's something the Conservative party will never try to repeat."

Khan won 57 percent of the vote in Thursday's mayoral election, securing 1.3 million votes to see off multimillionaire Tory Zac Goldsmith and making history as the first Muslim mayor of a major Western capital.

The 45-year-old, the son of a Pakistani immigrant bus driver, hailed his victory as a triumph of "unity over division" after weeks of Tory criticism over his past appearances at public events alongside radical Muslims.

A number of Conservative politicians criticised the tone of the campaign, but Defence Secretary Michael Fallon said the questions raised had been legitimate.

London's new Muslim mayor condemns 'Trump-style' attacks

Sounds like there is as much racial animus in London as in Chicago but from what little I know it appears to be more subdued there in London town. But everything is not as the media makes it appear to be as evidenced by Kahari's unprecedented ascension. My question is: what did the London conservatives do to make so many White Londoners abandon them? This radical departure from tradition merits a deeper investigation. Please join in and lets get to the bottom of this. Amazing, simply amazing!

The Tories ran a very negative campaign.Not just negative but incompetent. Khan was accused of all sorts just short of making a bomb. They pointed out tenuous links to "extremists" who later on turned out to be Conservative supporters.

They played the race card at every opportunity and upset minorities with their stupidity. As an example they could not differentiate between Sikhs and Muslims.

Zac Goldsmith criticised over leaflet aimed at British Indians

People were insulted by this approach and felt that the Tories were being patronising.

Experience shows that racist politics doesnt get you far in the UK and certainly not in the bigger cities.

Khan is a well known figure on the political scene and is seen as a moderate in the Blair camp.He presents more of a threat to the Labour party than London.

I also find it ironic that the dumbarses who were castigating Mr Obama for his interest in Britain are now leading the charge on the London Mayor. There is a massive lack of knowledge of the culture and politics of the UK. And Islam. And how the world works.

 

[Mindful]

The OP must have missed the fact that we already had a thread about this turd.
And speaking of him, he's already being an asshole:

London's new Muslim mayor condemns 'Trump-style' attacks

London (AFP) - London's new Muslim mayor Sadiq Khan accused Prime Minister David Cameron on Sunday of using "Donald Trump playbook" tactics to try to divide communities in a bid to prevent his election.

The day after being sworn in with a promise to be "mayor for all Londoners", the Labour lawmaker condemned Cameron's Conservatives for trying to link him to Islamic extremists during the election campaign.

"They used fear and innuendo to try to turn different ethnic and religious groups against each other -- something straight out of the Donald Trump playbook," Khan wrote in The Observer newspaper.

"Londoners deserved better and I hope it's something the Conservative party will never try to repeat."

Khan won 57 percent of the vote in Thursday's mayoral election, securing 1.3 million votes to see off multimillionaire Tory Zac Goldsmith and making history as the first Muslim mayor of a major Western capital.

The 45-year-old, the son of a Pakistani immigrant bus driver, hailed his victory as a triumph of "unity over division" after weeks of Tory criticism over his past appearances at public events alongside radical Muslims.

A number of Conservative politicians criticised the tone of the campaign, but Defence Secretary Michael Fallon said the questions raised had been legitimate.

London's new Muslim mayor condemns 'Trump-style' attacks

Sounds like there is as much racial animus in London as in Chicago but from what little I know it appears to be more subdued there in London town. But everything is not as the media makes it appear to be as evidenced by Kahari's unprecedented ascension. My question is: what did the London conservatives do to make so many White Londoners abandon them? This radical departure from tradition merits a deeper investigation. Please join in and lets get to the bottom of this. Amazing, simply amazing!

The Tories ran a very negative campaign.Not just negative but incompetent. Khan was accused of all sorts just short of making a bomb. They pointed out tenuous links to "extremists" who later on turned out to be Conservative supporters.

They played the race card at every opportunity and upset minorities with their stupidity. As an example they could not differentiate between Sikhs and Muslims.

Zac Goldsmith criticised over leaflet aimed at British Indians

People were insulted by this approach and felt that the Tories were being patronising.

Experience shows that racist politics doesnt get you far in the UK and certainly not in the bigger cities.

Khan is a well known figure on the political scene and is seen as a moderate in the Blair camp.He presents more of a threat to the Labour party than London.

I also find it ironic that the dumbarses who were castigating Mr Obama for his interest in Britain are now leading the charge on the London Mayor. There is a massive lack of knowledge of the culture and politics of the UK. And Islam. And how the world works.

Okay okay. No need to overdo it. We heard enough from Diane Abbott earlier.

Zac's lousy campaign is well known, so you don't need to regurgitate, like a parrot or a mynah bird.

As for the rest, the usual propagandist embroidery.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

Really?

In which case, and in which country?

Khan is still a British citizen, and still practices law in the UK, Farrakhan is American and lives in American. Why the hell would Khan be his defense lawyer? And did Farrakhan need a lawyer? For what?

In 2002, Khan defended Louis Farrakhan, who was seeking to overturn his ban on entering Britain.

I thought that everybody was entitled to legal representation ?

That's not the issue. Are you dim? Or merely dyslexic?

Frigid was questioning the British-American legal connection between the two protagonists.

Well you said this

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

And I am saying so what ? Somebody represented the Yorkshire Ripper and the Moors Murderers. It means nothing.Its just the way our legal system works.

The tories ran this sort of smear campaign throughout the election and it blew up in their faces. And yet you persevere with it because you lack the intelligence to do anything else.

The truth of it is that there isnt any Muslim that would be acceptable to you and your knuckle dragging mates. Any comments you make should be seen in that light.

 

[Mindful]

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

Really?

In which case, and in which country?

Khan is still a British citizen, and still practices law in the UK, Farrakhan is American and lives in American. Why the hell would Khan be his defense lawyer? And did Farrakhan need a lawyer? For what?

In 2002, Khan defended Louis Farrakhan, who was seeking to overturn his ban on entering Britain.

I thought that everybody was entitled to legal representation ?

That's not the issue. Are you dim? Or merely dyslexic?

Frigid was questioning the British-American legal connection between the two protagonists.

Well you said this

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

And I am saying so what ? Somebody represented the Yorkshire Ripper and the Moors Murderers. It means nothing.Its just the way our legal system works.

The tories ran this sort of smear campaign throughout the election and it blew up in their faces. And yet you persevere with it because you lack the intelligence to do anything else.

The truth of it is that there isnt any Muslim that would be acceptable to you and your knuckle dragging mates. Any comments you make should be seen in that light.

Ignorant, childish, slanderous, and subjective rants again. Stemming from zero knowledge of anything.

He's mayor now. What more do you want? Instead of raking over bitter old coals, ad infinitum. You should be happy.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Really?

In which case, and in which country?

Khan is still a British citizen, and still practices law in the UK, Farrakhan is American and lives in American. Why the hell would Khan be his defense lawyer? And did Farrakhan need a lawyer? For what?

In 2002, Khan defended Louis Farrakhan, who was seeking to overturn his ban on entering Britain.

I thought that everybody was entitled to legal representation ?

That's not the issue. Are you dim? Or merely dyslexic?

Frigid was questioning the British-American legal connection between the two protagonists.

Well you said this

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

And I am saying so what ? Somebody represented the Yorkshire Ripper and the Moors Murderers. It means nothing.Its just the way our legal system works.

The tories ran this sort of smear campaign throughout the election and it blew up in their faces. And yet you persevere with it because you lack the intelligence to do anything else.

The truth of it is that there isnt any Muslim that would be acceptable to you and your knuckle dragging mates. Any comments you make should be seen in that light.

Ignorant, childish, slanderous, and subjective rants again. Stemming from zero knowledge of anything.

He's mayor now. What more do you want? Instead of raking over bitter old coals, ad infinitum. You should be happy.

I think we can see who is bitter.

 

[Mindful]

In 2002, Khan defended Louis Farrakhan, who was seeking to overturn his ban on entering Britain.

I thought that everybody was entitled to legal representation ?

That's not the issue. Are you dim? Or merely dyslexic?

Frigid was questioning the British-American legal connection between the two protagonists.

Well you said this

He was also defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan.

And I am saying so what ? Somebody represented the Yorkshire Ripper and the Moors Murderers. It means nothing.Its just the way our legal system works.

The tories ran this sort of smear campaign throughout the election and it blew up in their faces. And yet you persevere with it because you lack the intelligence to do anything else.

The truth of it is that there isnt any Muslim that would be acceptable to you and your knuckle dragging mates. Any comments you make should be seen in that light.

Ignorant, childish, slanderous, and subjective rants again. Stemming from zero knowledge of anything.

He's mayor now. What more do you want? Instead of raking over bitter old coals, ad infinitum. You should be happy.

I think we can see who is bitter.

How extraordinary. That anonymous posters on an Internet forum should affect you in such a deeply personal way.

 

[Mindful]

This sounds promising. He must have a good PR team behind him.

Khan will attend the Holocaust Remembrance Ceremony on Sunday afternoon, according to the UK’s Jewish News, alongside UK Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis, Israeli Ambassador Mark Regev as well as other prominent members of the Jewish community.

Wonder if Jeremy and Ken will attend.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

This sounds promising. He must have a good PR team behind him.

Khan will attend the Holocaust Remembrance Ceremony on Sunday afternoon, according to the UK’s Jewish News, alongside UK Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis, Israeli Ambassador Mark Regev as well as other prominent members of the Jewish community.

Wonder if Jeremy and Ken will attend.

They tried the anti Semitism thing and it didnt work.You need to find a new conduit for your hate.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

At a time when Europe is reeling from reports of Muslims refugees running amok everywhere they go, Londoners have quietly voted in a Muslim to be their mayor. Lahore Karahi is the first ever Muslim to be elected as mayor of London and possibly the first minority. Considering that his opponent, a conservative snob, tried to tie hm to Islamic extremists, the taste of victory is even more satisfying.

The story broke early this morning but, unless I missed it, not a peep or post from the news hounds who don't miss a thing over at USMB. Yes, the eerie silence is quite telling. Its as if the RW crowd is watching from the shadows thinking their world is crumbling. EGADS! Whats next... Will one of the Royals marry a... ( the unthinkable)????

This merely points out the population switch in London, and proves how one group of people can displace another if permitted.