georgephillip
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #141
Partisan biases produce systemic differences between voter's preferences and any true beliefs that might be present:The same way Obama got elected. Braindead voters.Agreed....100%.I would suggest we never forget who pulls the politicians' strings:I think we should amend Memorial Day...it should also be a day in which we roundly and loudly condemn the sticking lying politicians and elites who caused so much death and suffering for Americans and non-Americans.
![]()
"The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the US National Archives that a firm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.
"His business dealings … continued until his company’s assets were seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act
***
"The documents reveal that the firm he worked for, Brown Brothers Harriman (BBH), acted as a US base for the German industrialist, Fritz Thyssen, who helped finance Hitler in the 1930s before falling out with him at the end of the decade.
"The Guardian has seen evidence that shows Bush was the director of the New York-based Union Banking Corporation (UBC) that represented Thyssen’s US interests and he continued to work for the bank after America entered the war.
Bankers are Behind the Wars
Oh that wonderful Bush family. They epitomize American politicians....corrupt and self serving...and yet two members of that asshole family became presidents. How the f**k does that happen?
Rational irrationality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"For rational irrationality at an individual level to have an effect on political outcomes, it is necessary that there be systemic ways in which people are irrational.
"In other words, people need to have systemic biases: there needs to be a systemic difference between people's preferences over beliefs and true beliefs.
"In the absence of systemic biases, different forms of irrationality would cancel out when aggregated using the voting process..."
"Implications for the outcomes of democracy[edit]
"When a large number of individuals hold systematically biased beliefs, the total cost to the democracy of all these irrational beliefs could be significant. Thus, even though every individual voter may be behaving rationally, the voters as a whole are not acting in their collective self-interest. This is analogous to the tragedy of the commons. Another way of thinking about it is that each voter, by being rationally irrational, creates a small negative externality for other voters."
Rational irrationality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia