CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 147,606
- 70,836
Obama's Fake Science News in overdrive
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama's Fake Science News in overdrive
No kidding. The poor bastards that generate all that crap are almost certain to wind up as collateral damage when the incoming US administration will ax the lion`s share of their UN budget in retaliation to that security council resolution against Israel. The knock out punch will be the EPA`s Scott Pruitt. It will be much like a Time on Target artillery fire effect.Obama's Fake Science News in overdrive
No kidding. The poor bastards that generate all that crap are almost certain to wind up as collateral damage when the incoming US administration will ax the lion`s share of their UN budget in retaliation to that security council resolution against Israel. The knock out punch will be the EPA`s Scott Pruitt. It will be much like a Time on Target artillery fire effect.Obama's Fake Science News in overdrive
I have already posted my evidence for rejecting their single minded focus on CO2. Do you want me to post it again? I don't need to show you the current state of orbital forcing to know that orbital forcing plays a role in climate change. I am not single focused like you are. I recognize that this is a complex system with many moving parts. I also recognize that the empirical data shows a trend for a cooling earth. I don't believe a 120 PARTS PER MILLION increase in atmospheric CO2 will change that trend.Do you really think you have the weight of evidence to reject the judgement of several thousand PhD researchers who have been studying this precise issue for several decades and who are quite certain that the rapid warming we've been undergoing is NOT a normal glacial cycle? TSI, for one thing Ding, is down to a level approaching the Maunder Minimum. If you're convinced this interglacial warming, show us the current state of the Milankovitch cycle.
Conversation on bipolar glaciation? You wouldn't be an altnernate identity for poster LaDexter would you?
I am not denying that orbital forcing plays a role, but the data do NOT show that it is producing a warming at the rate we are currently experiencing. Here are the states of the M cycles.
![]()
The core data both show that temperatures are already up and have been for almost 20,000 years. Holocene data like these:
![]()
show the warm period 6-10,000 years back and temperatures gently declining since then. The thumbnail PiP illustrate how atypical current conditions are. Orbital forcing is NOT producing the observed warming.
You are clearly an idiot. Go back and look at the data for the last four interglacial cycles. The resolution to make an apples to apples comparison does not exist.The rate comparison CAN be made.
![]()
You are clearly an idiot. Go back and look at the data for the last four interglacial cycles. The resolution to make an apples to apples comparison does not exist.The rate comparison CAN be made.
![]()
LOL...........you AGW k00ks are so naïve when it comes to basic human behavior and its relation to global warming. Its 6th grade stuff and not at all understood by all the genius' in here...........
Why nobody is caring about global warming in 2016>>>
Heuristics and constructed beliefs in climate change perception: Effect of outdoor temperature, question construction, and cognitive primes - Center for Research on Environmental Decisions
You are clearly an idiot.
LOL...........you AGW k00ks are so naïve when it comes to basic human behavior and its relation to global warming. Its 6th grade stuff and not at all understood by all the genius' in here...........
Why nobody is caring about global warming in 2016>>>
Heuristics and constructed beliefs in climate change perception: Effect of outdoor temperature, question construction, and cognitive primes - Center for Research on Environmental Decisions
"Judgments about climate change are malleable, and can be influenced by irrelevant environmental information."
That's you isn't it. A malleable tool.
Lol.Santa may need water skis instead of a sleigh this year.
A weather buoy about 90 miles south of the North Pole registered a temperature at the melting point of 32 degrees (0 Celsius) early Thursday, as a giant storm east of Greenland drew abnormally warm air northward.
Weather models had predicted temperatures could get this warm and this buoy, part of the North Pole Environmental Observatory, provides validation.
[Pre-Christmas melt? North Pole forecast to warm 50 degrees above normal Thursday]
“It seems likely areas very close to or at the North Pole were at the freezing point” Thursday, said Zachary Labe, a doctoral student researching Arctic climate and weather at the University of California at Irvine.
Data from the buoy (No. 300234064010010, which can be downloaded here) show that air temperatures have risen more than 40 degrees in the past two days, when they hovered near minus-11 degrees (minus-24 Celsius) which, even then, was above average.
historical records back to 1958, one cannot find a more intense anomaly – except following a similar spike just five weeks ago.
![]()
Weather buoy near North Pole hits melting point
Now Comrade Frankie boi, that looks like pretty solid evidence that you are lying one more time.