CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 146,580
- 69,684
Maybe change the title from "North Pole 50 degrees warmer" to "one buoy will read 32F for a few hours"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
The graph your using is "SEA ICE 15% or Greater coverage".. Which means that most of the area you so worried about is broken up ice with almost no coverage. And you cant grasp that simple concept..Svalbard to 90 miles south of the North Pole. And 148,000 sq. km. of melted ice. LOL And all you can do is make a comment like that? Truly down to one brain cell.
Crisis averted, lol.View attachment 104776
Well look here... back to the 2 Std range.... (of the last thirty years)
Ocean and Ice Services | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut
Hardly
LOLHardly
LOLHardly
The major portion of your graph is within 2std... because that is how long of a record we have. You really are a moron..
I believe that was sarcasm. I believe the phenomenon is called the glacial-interglacial cycle. We are currently in an interglacial cycle. Don't alarm yourself over it. It is perfectly natural.The last time the Arctic was ice-free was 2.6 million years ago. Homo Sapiens was over two million years in the future.
Explain how that makes it impossible for human CO2 emissions to be responsible for this warming.
The last time the Arctic was ice-free was 2.6 million years ago. Homo Sapiens was over two million years in the future.
Human civilization - the human species - has never seen an ice free Arctic before. It is NOT perfectly natural. It is perfectly synthetic.
And large portions of Alaska's and Canada's north shore well above normal. Nice cherry picking Comrade Frankie boi.
Arctic Weather Map