montelatici
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2014
- 18,686
- 2,107
- 280
Actually you have your history wrong. The entire region was part of Ottoman Empire for over 700 years of which at no time did the Ottomans recognize a Palestine or Palestinian people. When the Ottomans joined the Germans in World War I, they were defeated and their empire collapsed. 99% of the conquered Ottoman territory in the ME was carved into Muslim states, except for Israel, which was designated to be the Jewish homeland on the religious and ancestral Jewish land.Wow what a bunch of hogwash was that. Palestinians voted for Hamas, a barbaric terrorist organization to rule both the West Bank and Gaza. They currently rule and control all of Gaza. Yet another desperate bullshit nonsensical Monte comparison goes down in flames.Fenton Lum, Roudy, MJB12741, montelatici, et al,
Yes, trying to stay up with the propaganda (both the recommended and non-recommended) is quite a task in itself.
When we talk about the goals and objectives of the Palestinians (destiny kind of stuff), we have to remember that, unlike most governments, there is no truly unified political or diplomatic voice that speaks for the Palestinian People. --- Although that was suppose to have been settled some 4 decades ago when the Resolution adopted at the Seventh Arab League Summit Conference on 28 October 1974, recognising the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) as the “sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people.”
In most conversations, we just assume that we are either talking about HAMAS or the PLO (Khalid Mishaal vs Mahmoud Abbas - respectively); but there are a half-dozen or more factions out there that should not be counted-out just yet.. And in this,you have to be a bit careful. Even as something as simple as, what constitutes "Palestine," is argued even amongst Palestinians.
In the case of HAMAS (The Islamic Resistance Movement), An advocate or supporter of a political movement that favors reordering government and society in accordance with laws prescribed by Islam.And I recommend that we are cautious in the use of the term "Islamist" (which is not the same as a Hostile Arab Palestinian, Islamic fighters, militants or insurgents, extremists or radicals or asymmetric opponents, --- who may or may not be Islamists.
Today, the Middle East is so filled with hostiles, radicals, and fundamentalist, that you almost need a scorecard to keep track of them.
Yes, that's why Hamas wants to establish an Islamic caliphate of Palestine over the corpse of a destroyed Israel, while Israel is a tolerant secular democracy home to about two million Arab Muslims who live as Israeli citizens as well as doing an amazing job hosting and protecting holy shrines of all major world religions.(IMPORTANT REFERENCE on HAMAS)I'm fully aware of the propaganda.
Khalid Mishaal said:With regards to the rise of Islamists to power and the significance and impact this has on the issue, this does not imply that Palestine only needs Islamists, or that Hamas and the Islamic Jihad, as national Islamic Palestinian powers, are only in need of Islamists due to their importance, distinction, and firm position towards the issue. On the contrary, we need all the nation’s trends and elements; the Islamists, nationalists, liberals, and the left-wing. This is our nation, and we need everyone in it, and Palestine was and will remain a national issue. It is also necessary to disassociate ourselves from any divisions or sectarian, racial, or religious alignments. May Allah rid us of the hateful sectarianism that has spread over the region; May Allah rid us of racial, religious, and denominational divisions. Our nation has always been characterised with this beautiful diversity; this is a history that we have inherited, which has formed the nation’s civilization and course throughout history. Today, it is wrong for us to explore these gaps, in which our enemies pour oil and fire to destroy us. This not only requires us to instil correct ideas and concepts, but also entails that our behaviour, as countries, movements, academics, or intellectuals must be in line with these positions and concepts, and does not promote sectarian or ethnic feelings.
(COMMENT)
As you can tell by the Khalid Mishaal quote, that HAMAS is keeping it options open; especially in regards to excessive devotion to Islam and the idea of a Caliphate. For Palestine, this is a tightrope. HAMAS and the Palestinians cannot be seen as being on the wrong side of the Koran. If you study Khalid Mishaal, you will notice that he see the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) from three aspect angles:
• A simple Islamic Movement,But Mishaal does not see HAMAS as a hard core advocate, and introduction of, establishing a new order in the Arab League
• A a very familiar national liberations movement,
• Palestinian rallying point, a new central hub.
An Islamist is "an advocate or supporter of a political movement that favors reordering government and society in accordance with laws prescribed by Islam." (wikipedia) He does not have a vision of HAMAS contributing to a Salafist movement or Caliphate, a return to the 7th Century Islamic ideas and morals of the era of era at the expense inalienable rights (in a Caliphate, the Caliph has absolute authority).
DAESH (ISIS) seeks to establish political domain and the agencies by using religious institutions,
such as sharia courts, to support and justify the political arm.
Salafi-jihadist (militant Sunni Islamism - Salafism, an Islamist revivalist movement within Sunni Islam) based on two criteria.
While it cannot be denied that Mishaal and HAMAS have advocated the first many time, most recently in the HAMAS Position Paper of 2012, clearly the first criteria is going to be very hard to secure.
First, the importance of returning to a “pure” Islam, and activity that is justified by the new color of law.
Second, the spread and adoption jihad is fard ‘ayn (a personal religious duty).
Most Respectfully,
R
Firstly, Hamas is supported by a minority of Palestinians, about 34% at most. The Jewish Home party (Habayit Yehudi) and now even Likud have the same aims as Hamas, replacing Judaism for Islam and to make Israel 100% preferably free of non-Jews or guaranteed Jewish rule over non-Jews, with Jews maintaining their current privileges over non-Jews in terms of land, right of return etc. They represent a larger minority, if not a majority among the Jews.
You have two extremist groups that will never be able to come any peaceful settlement.
If Israel was some american group sponging off of US taxpayers you'd be soiling yourself with rage. Colonial powers tried to go in and carve up the middle east amongst themselves just like they did in Africa and there's been nothing but trouble ever since. We just keep throwing good money and bodies in after bad. Mostly because of zealots such as yourself. Ya just can't have a sensible conversation with fanatics.
American public stands staunchly shoulder to shoulder with Israel, and the two nations are inseparable. US Govt. officials and politicians are merely carrying out the will of the people.
No, as usual you are full of crap. The Mameluks ruled Palestine until 1486. The Ottomans lost control of Palestine in 1799 when it was invaded by Napoleon and it remained under local and/or Egyptian rule until Muhammed Ali was defeated by the allied British and Ottomans and signed the Treaty of 1841. Where do you get 700 plus years you idiot.
The Ottomans certainly recognized Filistin (Palestine) it's on Ottoman era maps. There is nothing ancestral to Europeans about Palestine. Europeans are Europeans. It is the ancestral land of the native inhabitants, the Palestinian Christians and Muslims.
Little by little more of us are becoming even handed in evaluating the conflict. Within a decade most Americans will be supporting the non-Jews in Palestine/Israel as we came around to supporting the non-whites in South Africa.