Mexican is a nationality, not a race.

[Nosmo King]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

Impossible to be biased if you were born in the USA? is that what you are claiming? How about Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan, and Whoopi? Are they not biased?

BTW, Mexican is not a race, neither is muslim, or African, or Irish, or arab.

I'm saying that being Mexican is not a race, so Trump is not being racist when he wants to build a wall. Since Mexican is a nationality, nothing about Curiel can be Mexican. He is an American citizen, born in the United States to American citizens. If we reject any connection between anti-Mexican rhetoric and racism, we must also reject any connection between Curiel's ancestry and an imagined expectation that he will be biased against Trump because of that same rhetoric.

Then let us correct the language immediately! Trump is not a racist in this context. He is Anti-Latino.

For the record, he is also anti-POW, anti-Chinese, anti-Woman, anti-Black and anti-Intellectual.

Now, piling up all those things Trump is 'anti', can we imagine he is trying to use his big mouth to sway justice in his favor and failing spectacularly?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

Impossible to be biased if you were born in the USA? is that what you are claiming? How about Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan, and Whoopi? Are they not biased?

BTW, Mexican is not a race, neither is muslim, or African, or Irish, or arab.

I'm saying that being Mexican is not a race, so Trump is not being racist when he wants to build a wall. Since Mexican is a nationality, nothing about Curiel can be Mexican. He is an American citizen, born in the United States to American citizens. If we reject any connection between anti-Mexican rhetoric and racism, we must also reject any connection between Curiel's ancestry and an imagined expectation that he will be biased against Trump because of that same rhetoric.

Then let us correct the language immediately! Trump is not a racist in this context. He is Anti-Latino.

For the record, he is also anti-POW, anti-Chinese, anti-Woman, anti-Black and anti-Intellectual.

Now, piling up all those things Trump is 'anti', can we imagine he is trying to use his big mouth to sway justice in his favor and failing spectacularly?

Lighten up Nozzle Queen... he isn't any of that.

 

[Correll]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

There is no reason that a "Mexican" or Mexican-American, or a Hispanic Judge could NOT be biased against a man who the Hard Left has been claiming for months is hated by Hispanics.

Semantic games do not change reality, not matter how hard people try to make it do so.

 

[Correll]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

Impossible to be biased if you were born in the USA? is that what you are claiming? How about Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan, and Whoopi? Are they not biased?

BTW, Mexican is not a race, neither is muslim, or African, or Irish, or arab.

I'm saying that being Mexican is not a race, so Trump is not being racist when he wants to build a wall. Since Mexican is a nationality, nothing about Curiel can be Mexican. He is an American citizen, born in the United States to American citizens. If we reject any connection between anti-Mexican rhetoric and racism, we must also reject any connection between Curiel's ancestry and an imagined expectation that he will be biased against Trump because of that same rhetoric.

Then let us correct the language immediately! Trump is not a racist in this context. He is Anti-Latino.

For the record, he is also anti-POW, anti-Chinese, anti-Woman, anti-Black and anti-Intellectual.

Now, piling up all those things Trump is 'anti', can we imagine he is trying to use his big mouth to sway justice in his favor and failing spectacularly?

Do you believe that Hispanics hate Trump?

 

[Rocko]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

Impossible to be biased if you were born in the USA? is that what you are claiming? How about Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan, and Whoopi? Are they not biased?

BTW, Mexican is not a race, neither is muslim, or African, or Irish, or arab.

I'm saying that being Mexican is not a race, so Trump is not being racist when he wants to build a wall. Since Mexican is a nationality, nothing about Curiel can be Mexican. He is an American citizen, born in the United States to American citizens. If we reject any connection between anti-Mexican rhetoric and racism, we must also reject any connection between Curiel's ancestry and an imagined expectation that he will be biased against Trump because of that same rhetoric.

Anti mexican langauge may no be racism, technically, but it mist certainly is bigotry. Youre just trying to use word game to your advantage.

 

[SwimExpert]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

There is no reason that a "Mexican" or Mexican-American, or a Hispanic Judge could NOT be biased against a man who the Hard Left has been claiming for months is hated by Hispanics.

Semantic games do not change reality, not matter how hard people try to make it do so.

Trump's entire argument is a semantics game. The man is an American. Period. He comes from Indiana.

 

[SwimExpert]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

Can you explain why all of these hispanic Americans are calling themselves Mexicans?

What Hispanic Americans? I'm a "Hispanic" American. I just call myself American. And awesome. I call myself awesome.

 

[Nosmo King]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

Impossible to be biased if you were born in the USA? is that what you are claiming? How about Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan, and Whoopi? Are they not biased?

BTW, Mexican is not a race, neither is muslim, or African, or Irish, or arab.

I'm saying that being Mexican is not a race, so Trump is not being racist when he wants to build a wall. Since Mexican is a nationality, nothing about Curiel can be Mexican. He is an American citizen, born in the United States to American citizens. If we reject any connection between anti-Mexican rhetoric and racism, we must also reject any connection between Curiel's ancestry and an imagined expectation that he will be biased against Trump because of that same rhetoric.

Then let us correct the language immediately! Trump is not a racist in this context. He is Anti-Latino.

For the record, he is also anti-POW, anti-Chinese, anti-Woman, anti-Black and anti-Intellectual.

Now, piling up all those things Trump is 'anti', can we imagine he is trying to use his big mouth to sway justice in his favor and failing spectacularly?

Lighten up Nozzle Queen... he isn't any of that.

Says you, but he says so.

 

[Rocko]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

There is no reason that a "Mexican" or Mexican-American, or a Hispanic Judge could NOT be biased against a man who the Hard Left has been claiming for months is hated by Hispanics.

Semantic games do not change reality, not matter how hard people try to make it do so.

Trump's entire argument is a semantics game. The man is an American. Period. He comes from Indiana.

Its irellevant where he's from if being from Mexican is central to his identy like many people of mexican origin. The ironic thing is you are playing a game of semantics.

 

[couch protester]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

Hispanics are proud of their country and heritage, Americans are not, so, we're more proud for Hispanics than our own country and traditions. It's funny how an American OP take sides with illegals who wave their flags in American faces to insult Americans, then assault Americans at free speech rallies. They shame America, so do you

 

[Nosmo King]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

Impossible to be biased if you were born in the USA? is that what you are claiming? How about Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan, and Whoopi? Are they not biased?

BTW, Mexican is not a race, neither is muslim, or African, or Irish, or arab.

I'm saying that being Mexican is not a race, so Trump is not being racist when he wants to build a wall. Since Mexican is a nationality, nothing about Curiel can be Mexican. He is an American citizen, born in the United States to American citizens. If we reject any connection between anti-Mexican rhetoric and racism, we must also reject any connection between Curiel's ancestry and an imagined expectation that he will be biased against Trump because of that same rhetoric.

Then let us correct the language immediately! Trump is not a racist in this context. He is Anti-Latino.

For the record, he is also anti-POW, anti-Chinese, anti-Woman, anti-Black and anti-Intellectual.

Now, piling up all those things Trump is 'anti', can we imagine he is trying to use his big mouth to sway justice in his favor and failing spectacularly?

Rapists, murderers, drug dealers. Some of them, I assume, are good people.



Do you believe that Hispanics hate Trump?

"Rapists, murderers, drug dealers. I assume some of them are good people". What's not to like about Trump after he says something like that?

 

[SwimExpert]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

Hispanics are proud of their country and heritage, Americans are not, so, we're more proud for Hispanics than our own country and traditions. It's funny how an American OP take sides with illegals who wave their flags in American faces to insult Americans, then assault Americans at free speech rallies. They shame America, so do you

What the fuck are you talking about?

 

[SwimExpert]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

There is no reason that a "Mexican" or Mexican-American, or a Hispanic Judge could NOT be biased against a man who the Hard Left has been claiming for months is hated by Hispanics.

Semantic games do not change reality, not matter how hard people try to make it do so.

Trump's entire argument is a semantics game. The man is an American. Period. He comes from Indiana.

Its irellevant where he's from if being from Mexican is central to his identy like many people of mexican origin. The ironic thing is you are playing a game of semantics.

He's not "of Mexican origin." He's from Indiana.

 

[Rocko]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

There is no reason that a "Mexican" or Mexican-American, or a Hispanic Judge could NOT be biased against a man who the Hard Left has been claiming for months is hated by Hispanics.

Semantic games do not change reality, not matter how hard people try to make it do so.

Trump's entire argument is a semantics game. The man is an American. Period. He comes from Indiana.

Its irellevant where he's from if being from Mexican is central to his identy like many people of mexican origin. The ironic thing is you are playing a game of you'semantics.

He's not "of Mexican origin." He's from Indiana.

Heritage, you are playing semantics.

 

[Correll]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

Impossible to be biased if you were born in the USA? is that what you are claiming? How about Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan, and Whoopi? Are they not biased?

BTW, Mexican is not a race, neither is muslim, or African, or Irish, or arab.

I'm saying that being Mexican is not a race, so Trump is not being racist when he wants to build a wall. Since Mexican is a nationality, nothing about Curiel can be Mexican. He is an American citizen, born in the United States to American citizens. If we reject any connection between anti-Mexican rhetoric and racism, we must also reject any connection between Curiel's ancestry and an imagined expectation that he will be biased against Trump because of that same rhetoric.

Anti mexican langauge may no be racism, technically, but it mist certainly is bigotry. Youre just trying to use word game to your advantage.

Are you sure that the Judge is NOT biased against Trump?

After all he is a Hispanic and you lefties have been screaming for months that the Hispanics hate Trump.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Not to mention most Mexicans aren't Hispanic. They are of Indian decent. Actually. the elites are mostly of Spanish decent and look at the indigenous "Mexicans" as sub-human. Same thing in Central America as well.

Don't tell them that because then the left will demand that Mexico give back their country to the Aztecs or something. I doubt they will because for some reason they only like to make that argument when it involves America. Why? Why is it only Americans have to give up their land to the Indians and no other North or South American country has to? Is it because they hate America that much.

 

[Redfish]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

There is no reason that a "Mexican" or Mexican-American, or a Hispanic Judge could NOT be biased against a man who the Hard Left has been claiming for months is hated by Hispanics.

Semantic games do not change reality, not matter how hard people try to make it do so.

Trump's entire argument is a semantics game. The man is an American. Period. He comes from Indiana.

Its irellevant where he's from if being from Mexican is central to his identy like many people of mexican origin. The ironic thing is you are playing a game of semantics.

He's not "of Mexican origin." He's from Indiana.

Lets see now, if both of your parents were Irish would you be of Irish origin or Irish heritage?

The judge is the son of Mexican parents (possibly in this country illegally). He has done well for himself in the USA and can be proud of that, but that does not excuse making rulings from the bench that are biased (or could be seen as biased). He is a member of a Hispanic legal organization. Do you think for a minute that that organization is not pro-Mexican? Please think before answering.

 

[SwimExpert]

And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.

Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.

There is no reason that a "Mexican" or Mexican-American, or a Hispanic Judge could NOT be biased against a man who the Hard Left has been claiming for months is hated by Hispanics.

Semantic games do not change reality, not matter how hard people try to make it do so.

Trump's entire argument is a semantics game. The man is an American. Period. He comes from Indiana.

Its irellevant where he's from if being from Mexican is central to his identy like many people of mexican origin. The ironic thing is you are playing a game of you'semantics.

He's not "of Mexican origin." He's from Indiana.

Heritage, you are playing semantics.

You're passing off 20 different words in an attempt to repackage the same faulty premise, and somehow I'm the one who is playing semantics games? The man is from Indiana. There is no semantics game in that statement. He is from Indiana. He's not Mexican. He's American.

I look forward to you attempting once again to repeat the same premise with different words while accusing me of playing semantics games.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Not to mention most Mexicans aren't Hispanic. They are of Indian decent. Actually. the elites are mostly of Spanish decent and look at the indigenous "Mexicans" as sub-human. Same thing in Central America as well.

Don't tell them that because then the left will demand that Mexico give back their country to the Aztecs or something. I doubt they will because for some reason they only like to make that argument when it involves America. Why? Why is it only Americans have to give up their land to the Indians and no other North or South American country has to? Is it because they hate America that much.

Herein lies the irony....

 

[Redfish]

There is no reason that a "Mexican" or Mexican-American, or a Hispanic Judge could NOT be biased against a man who the Hard Left has been claiming for months is hated by Hispanics.

Semantic games do not change reality, not matter how hard people try to make it do so.

Trump's entire argument is a semantics game. The man is an American. Period. He comes from Indiana.

Its irellevant where he's from if being from Mexican is central to his identy like many people of mexican origin. The ironic thing is you are playing a game of you'semantics.

He's not "of Mexican origin." He's from Indiana.

Heritage, you are playing semantics.

You're passing off 20 different words in an attempt to repackage the same faulty premise, and somehow I'm the one who is playing semantics games? The man is from Indiana. There is no semantics game in that statement. He is from Indiana. He's not Mexican. He's American.

I look forward to you attempting once again to repeat the same premise with different words while accusing me of playing semantics games.

Then I assume you don't believe that there is any such thing as an African American if the black person was born in the USA, right?