Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.
Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.
And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.
Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.
There is no reason that a "Mexican" or Mexican-American, or a Hispanic Judge could NOT be biased against a man who the Hard Left has been claiming for months is hated by Hispanics.
Semantic games do not change reality, not matter how hard people try to make it do so.
Trump's entire argument is a semantics game. The man is an American. Period. He comes from Indiana.
And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.
Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.
There is no reason that a "Mexican" or Mexican-American, or a Hispanic Judge could NOT be biased against a man who the Hard Left has been claiming for months is hated by Hispanics.
Semantic games do not change reality, not matter how hard people try to make it do so.
Trump's entire argument is a semantics game. The man is an American. Period. He comes from Indiana.
No, Trump's argument is that the Judge, because of his Mexican heritage, is biased against him.
Considering the man's membership in an organization that is strongly opposed to Trump, and attacks him in some of the harshest language, this concern is quite credible.
Your argument is the one that is based on semantics.
Lets see now, if both of your parents were Irish would you be of Irish origin or Irish heritage?
The judge is the son of Mexican parents (possibly in this country illegally).
He has done well for himself in the USA and can be proud of that, but that does not excuse making rulings from the bench that are biased (or could be seen as biased). He is a member of a Hispanic legal organization. Do you think for a minute that that organization is not pro-Mexican? Please think before answering.
"Rapists, murderers, drug dealers. I assume some of them are good people". What's not to like about Trump after he says something like that?Rapists, murderers, drug dealers. Some of them, I assume, are good people.Then let us correct the language immediately! Trump is not a racist in this context. He is Anti-Latino.And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.
Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.
Impossible to be biased if you were born in the USA? is that what you are claiming? How about Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan, and Whoopi? Are they not biased?
BTW, Mexican is not a race, neither is muslim, or African, or Irish, or arab.
I'm saying that being Mexican is not a race, so Trump is not being racist when he wants to build a wall. Since Mexican is a nationality, nothing about Curiel can be Mexican. He is an American citizen, born in the United States to American citizens. If we reject any connection between anti-Mexican rhetoric and racism, we must also reject any connection between Curiel's ancestry and an imagined expectation that he will be biased against Trump because of that same rhetoric.
For the record, he is also anti-POW, anti-Chinese, anti-Woman, anti-Black and anti-Intellectual.
Now, piling up all those things Trump is 'anti', can we imagine he is trying to use his big mouth to sway justice in his favor and failing spectacularly?
Do you believe that Hispanics hate Trump?
No, Trump's argument is that the Judge, because of his Mexican heritage, is biased against him.
There is no reason that a "Mexican" or Mexican-American, or a Hispanic Judge could NOT be biased against a man who the Hard Left has been claiming for months is hated by Hispanics.
Semantic games do not change reality, not matter how hard people try to make it do so.
Trump's entire argument is a semantics game. The man is an American. Period. He comes from Indiana.
Its irellevant where he's from if being from Mexican is central to his identy like many people of mexican origin. The ironic thing is you are playing a game of you'semantics.
He's not "of Mexican origin." He's from Indiana.
Heritage, you are playing semantics.
You're passing off 20 different words in an attempt to repackage the same faulty premise, and somehow I'm the one who is playing semantics games? The man is from Indiana. There is no semantics game in that statement. He is from Indiana. He's not Mexican. He's American.
I look forward to you attempting once again to repeat the same premise with different words while accusing me of playing semantics games.
It wasn't till your boy dump made it so.How is race relevant to the trump case?Massive false comparison.And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.
Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.
Impossible to be biased if you were born in the USA? is that what you are claiming? How about Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan, and Whoopi? Are they not biased?
BTW, Mexican is not a race, neither is muslim, or African, or Irish, or arab.
Since when did race become irrelevant to obvious racists like yourself.
This whole sham whites are victims ploy the right is trying to sell is rock solid proof of that bias.
So obviously Trump cannot be a racist, You can quit whining about that now.And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.
Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.
And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.
Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.
There is no reason that a "Mexican" or Mexican-American, or a Hispanic Judge could NOT be biased against a man who the Hard Left has been claiming for months is hated by Hispanics.
Semantic games do not change reality, not matter how hard people try to make it do so.
Trump's entire argument is a semantics game. The man is an American. Period. He comes from Indiana.
Its irellevant where he's from if being from Mexican is central to his identy like many people of mexican origin. The ironic thing is you are playing a game of semantics.
He's not "of Mexican origin." He's from Indiana.
Lets see now, if both of your parents were Irish would you be of Irish origin or Irish heritage?
The judge is the son of Mexican parents (possibly in this country illegally). He has done well for himself in the USA and can be proud of that, but that does not excuse making rulings from the bench that are biased (or could be seen as biased). He is a member of a Hispanic legal organization. Do you think for a minute that that organization is not pro-Mexican? Please think before answering.
There is no reason that a "Mexican" or Mexican-American, or a Hispanic Judge could NOT be biased against a man who the Hard Left has been claiming for months is hated by Hispanics.
Semantic games do not change reality, not matter how hard people try to make it do so.
Trump's entire argument is a semantics game. The man is an American. Period. He comes from Indiana.
Its irellevant where he's from if being from Mexican is central to his identy like many people of mexican origin. The ironic thing is you are playing a game of you'semantics.
He's not "of Mexican origin." He's from Indiana.
Heritage, you are playing semantics.
You're passing off 20 different words in an attempt to repackage the same faulty premise, and somehow I'm the one who is playing semantics games? The man is from Indiana. There is no semantics game in that statement. He is from Indiana. He's not Mexican. He's American.
I look forward to you attempting once again to repeat the same premise with different words while accusing me of playing semantics games.
Classic bullshit rationalizing.We are all biased, we just don't admit, which is your problem. You let your distaste for others' nationality or race or religion or ethnicity or whatever rule your common sense. You are right there with S. J. and Lonestar_Logic and others.And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.
Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.
Impossible to be biased if you were born in the USA? is that what you are claiming? How about Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan, and Whoopi? Are they not biased?
BTW, Mexican is not a race, neither is muslim, or African, or Irish, or arab.
You don't know shit about me or how I treat other races, religions etc. For the record I have black friends, jewish friends, gay friends, and Yes, muslim friends. I treat them all with respect and have no biases. I judge people by their actions and words, that's why I consider you a fraud and a liar.
No bias there ,nope, no sir, none.And that is why Trump's claim that Curiel is biased is absolute bullshit. Curiel is an American. He was born in Indiana. He's lived in this country his entire life. He's American. He's not Mexican. Therefore, it is impossible for him to be biased by Trump's wall building rhetoric.
Thank you drumpfodder for clearing this up.
There is no reason that a "Mexican" or Mexican-American, or a Hispanic Judge could NOT be biased against a man who the Hard Left has been claiming for months is hated by Hispanics.
Semantic games do not change reality, not matter how hard people try to make it do so.
Trump's entire argument is a semantics game. The man is an American. Period. He comes from Indiana.
Its irellevant where he's from if being from Mexican is central to his identy like many people of mexican origin. The ironic thing is you are playing a game of semantics.
He's not "of Mexican origin." He's from Indiana.
Lets see now, if both of your parents were Irish would you be of Irish origin or Irish heritage?
The judge is the son of Mexican parents (possibly in this country illegally). He has done well for himself in the USA and can be proud of that, but that does not excuse making rulings from the bench that are biased (or could be seen as biased). He is a member of a Hispanic legal organization. Do you think for a minute that that organization is not pro-Mexican? Please think before answering.
Trump shot himself in the foot so far as a fair trial goes. Calling out the judge can be seen as contempt."Rapists, murderers, drug dealers. I assume some of them are good people". What's not to like about Trump after he says something like that?Rapists, murderers, drug dealers. Some of them, I assume, are good people.Then let us correct the language immediately! Trump is not a racist in this context. He is Anti-Latino.Impossible to be biased if you were born in the USA? is that what you are claiming? How about Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan, and Whoopi? Are they not biased?
BTW, Mexican is not a race, neither is muslim, or African, or Irish, or arab.
I'm saying that being Mexican is not a race, so Trump is not being racist when he wants to build a wall. Since Mexican is a nationality, nothing about Curiel can be Mexican. He is an American citizen, born in the United States to American citizens. If we reject any connection between anti-Mexican rhetoric and racism, we must also reject any connection between Curiel's ancestry and an imagined expectation that he will be biased against Trump because of that same rhetoric.
For the record, he is also anti-POW, anti-Chinese, anti-Woman, anti-Black and anti-Intellectual.
Now, piling up all those things Trump is 'anti', can we imagine he is trying to use his big mouth to sway justice in his favor and failing spectacularly?
Do you believe that Hispanics hate Trump?
So, that is a yes.
SO, now what do you believe about Trump's right to get a Fair and Impartial Trial?
Is it less or more important then the Right of the Hard Left to go on a fishing expedition to get more information to smear Trump with?
Then I assume you don't believe that there is any such thing as an African American if the black person was born in the USA, right?
No, Trump's argument is that the Judge, because of his Mexican heritage, is biased against him.
Mexican heritage? What Mexican heritage? Heritage is a cultural phenomenon. My father was born in PR. I have no Puerto Rican heritage. Zero. I'm American. Period. My mother's water broke while she was standing 100 feet from the liberty bell for crying out loud. The fact that some of my ancestors lived in Puerto Rico does not create heritage. Hell, if you go back far enough every single one of us has ancestors who lived in Africa. Should we talk about your African heritage?
Considering the man's membership in an organization that is strongly opposed to Trump, and attacks him in some of the harshest language, this concern is quite credible.
Another child left behind. "Idictment", sheesh.And if Trump's "university" had not bilked so many people out of so much money, there would be no need for a trial. "Fishing expedition"? Let's call an indictment an indictment.
