lennypartiv
Diamond Member
- Jul 16, 2019
- 26,522
- 20,342
- 2,320
Should be. It was a requirement by the Founding Fathers who got it right. Dumb people shouldn't be allowed to vote.Property ownership is a requirement to vote these days?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Should be. It was a requirement by the Founding Fathers who got it right. Dumb people shouldn't be allowed to vote.Property ownership is a requirement to vote these days?
You can’t vote while you are “cooling off”She didn't say that, cooling off period (not sure what that means) is not the same as
barring them from voting.
But, kind of reminds me when the gov. of Ca. was kicking around the idea of taxing
people who who were moving out of state.
Politicians say the oddest things.
Then Trump would have lost by an even greater margin.Should be. It was a requirement by the Founding Fathers who got it right. Dumb people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
Only the elite men were allowed to vote.Should be. It was a requirement by the Founding Fathers who got it right. Dumb people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
Sorry, you don't have to be a white landowner to get to vote anymore.As long as they own property in their new State, should be OK for them to vote
By the time the United States Constitution was ratified (1789), a small number of free blacks were among the voting citizens (men of property) in some states.[11] The United States Constitution did not originally define who was eligible to vote, allowing each state to determine who was eligible. In the early history of the U.S., some states[which?] allowed only white male adult property owners to vote, while others[which?] either did not specify race, or specifically protected the rights of men of any race to vote.[12][13][14][15] Freed slaves could vote in four states.[16] Women were largely prohibited from voting, as were men without property. Women could vote in New Jersey until 1807 (provided they could meet the property requirement) and in some local jurisdictions in other northern states. Free Blacks could also vote in these jurisdictions[which?], provided they could meet the property requirement. In New Jersey particularly, these property requirements were purposely set quite low.[17]Only the elite men were allowed to vote.
Such is the reprehensible right’s contempt for the right to vote, our democratic institutions, and the will of the American people.Greene said Democrats moving to red states should be temporarily barred from voting.
She's a conservative.She is a loon.
Do you believe that those who move from blue states to red states should have a "cooling off period" before being allowed to vote? Yes or no?Somebody didn't read the whole article and apply critical thinking, and we all know who you are. You need to cite what she actually said, not what the guy responding to her tweet said.
she didnt say that,,Do you believe that those who move from blue states to red states should have a "cooling off period" before being allowed to vote? Yes or no?
Red states need to erect large numbers of billboards that direct Democrats to follow the signs and keep them pointed to the next blue state.Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene suggested that Democrats who move to red states should get a 'cooling off period' before being allowed to vote
With Florida and Texas seeing an influx of new residents, Greene said it is "wise" to bar Democrats moving to red states from voting temporarily.www.yahoo.com
How many of our so-called right wing supporters of the Constitution agree with her?
I did....the link.its your thread so why didnt you post it instead of more fake news??
Wrong.She didn't say that, cooling off period (not sure what that means) is not the same as
barring them from voting.
But, kind of reminds me when the gov. of Ca. was kicking around the idea of taxing
people who who were moving out of state.
Politicians say the oddest things.
so let me ask you,,I did....the link.
But, unfortunately, due to stalking issues, even tho I created this thread, I'm gonna bow out. Feel free to start a con-versation with me if you want to con-tinue. Unless this post disappears before you see it.
your premise is a lie,,Wrong.
A Constitutional right delayed is a Constitutional right denied.
Whatever Greene ‘means’ would be a violation of the 14th Amendment right to due process and equal protection of the law.
Not that you and other conservatives care about the Constitution, of course.
Since she didn't say that, the question's really moot, isn't it? Why don't you address the fact that you didn't really read the article?Do you believe that those who move from blue states to red states should have a "cooling off period" before being allowed to vote? Yes or no?
You're a liar.she didnt say that,,
read your own link for once,,
Why you hit an run artist....Start a thread on a false premise to smear, then when your feet get held to the fire for misrepresenting what the Congressperson said, you want to run...Well, go ahead coward...I did....the link.
But, unfortunately, due to stalking issues, even tho I created this thread, I'm gonna bow out. Feel free to start a con-versation with me if you want to con-tinue. Unless this post disappears before you see it.
got a link??You're a liar.
"On Wednesday, Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene advocated that people moving from Democratic-leaning states to Republican-leaning states should be temporarily barred from voting." ibid