Ravi
Diamond Member
- Feb 27, 2008
- 90,899
- 14,009
Their own report names him as an accomplice. So either their report is true and they suspected both or their report is false and they are covering their asses.Yes they let the situation get out of hand by not reacting quickly enough and arresting violent protestors, but they did not incite a riot. They did not burn and loot.
The left can not accept responsibility for anything, can they?IF THE CHARGE OF ROBBERY IS TRUE, the cops should have arrested the other guy AT THE TIME of the shooting and let it be known that they were both suspects in a violent robbery. Then there would have been no four days of rioting.
Surely you can see that Ernie.
At that point, they could only suspect that Johnson was Brown's accomplice at the Quick Mart. It usually is necessary to gather evidence before you make an arrest.
THEN shit got out of hand and police were otherwise occupied.
The riots are not the fault of the police. They can ONLY be blamed on the rioters themselves.
The riots could have been prevented by doing what I suggested.