Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are all theft. Shoplifting is obvious, robbery is by force and burglary is breaking and entering secretively. The amount stolen is only legally relevant in shoplifting.I wonder what the difference between shop lifting, burglary, theft and robbery are in Missouri?
Just wondering why people are saying this was a robbery at the convenient store? Each State has its own rules and laws on it...I suppose? some States have shop lifting of over $1000 then turns to a higher level crime than a misdemeanor...some States have it over $400....this kind of thing that changes...and sentencing also...each State would seem to have their own laws....?
From an earlier post I madeI wonder what the difference between shop lifting, burglary, theft and robbery are in Missouri?
Just wondering why people are saying this was a robbery at the convenient store? Each State has its own rules and laws on it...I suppose? some States have shop lifting of over $1000 then turns to a higher level crime than a misdemeanor...some States have it over $400....this kind of thing that changes...and sentencing also...each State would seem to have their own laws....?
Robbery in the second degree.
569.030. 1. A person commits the crime of robbery in the second degree when he forcibly steals property.
2. Robbery in the second degree is a class B felony.
(L. 1977 S.B. 60)
They are all theft. Shoplifting is obvious, robbery is by force and burglary is breaking and entering secretively. The amount stolen is only legally relevant in shoplifting.I wonder what the difference between shop lifting, burglary, theft and robbery are in Missouri?
Just wondering why people are saying this was a robbery at the convenient store? Each State has its own rules and laws on it...I suppose? some States have shop lifting of over $1000 then turns to a higher level crime than a misdemeanor...some States have it over $400....this kind of thing that changes...and sentencing also...each State would seem to have their own laws....?
At least so I think, but google is better at this than I.
He is not in the ground for walking in the street or for robbery. He is in the ground because he grew up believing his massive size was his ticket to do as he pleased -- including resisting arrest and attacking a cop.IF THE CHARGE OF ROBBERY IS TRUE, the cops should have arrested the other guy AT THE TIME of the shooting and let it be known that they were both suspects in a violent robbery. Then there would have been no four days of rioting.
Surely you can see that Ernie.
At the time of the riots it was thought to be a "walking while black" stop. If the cops had not been so close hold on information relevant to the stop, they could have prevented much of the violence
Their SWAT team tactics only made matters worse
The problem is, he wasn't stopped for the robbery. Which they have admitted to. He was stopped for walking down the street.
Brown should be in jail, not in the ground.
How did he go about stealing it...he pushed the clerk away...It's not what he stole. It's the way he went about stealing it that offends the civilized mind. And whether or not you can understand that says a great deal about you.WOW how the fuck you can twist what Patriots stand for while defending a thug who stole from an immigrate small business owner goes beyond common expectation of comprehension.
This kid stole a box of cigars.
You "Patriots" helped the 1%ers steal the whole fucking middle class.
You talk smack all day about how you needs to have your guns so you can take on the "gummit" when they oppress you.
Shooting a kid in the middle of the street after he surrendered because he stole a $50.00 box of cigars. I can't imagine that being anything but "oppression".
What Michael Brown did was not only unlawful it was absolutely primitive, which is why I have no regret for what happened to him. He was an arrogant bully and the world is better off without him.
How did he go about stealing it...he pushed the clerk away...It's not what he stole. It's the way he went about stealing it that offends the civilized mind. And whether or not you can understand that says a great deal about you.This kid stole a box of cigars.
You "Patriots" helped the 1%ers steal the whole fucking middle class.
You talk smack all day about how you needs to have your guns so you can take on the "gummit" when they oppress you.
Shooting a kid in the middle of the street after he surrendered because he stole a $50.00 box of cigars. I can't imagine that being anything but "oppression".
What Michael Brown did was not only unlawful it was absolutely primitive, which is why I have no regret for what happened to him. He was an arrogant bully and the world is better off without him.
Did he pull a knife on him? Did he pull a gun on him? did he punch him in the face? Did he beat the living crap out of him? All things he could have done that would have been horrific....and much worse...but he DID NOT do any of those things....
so what is it that bothers you SOOOOOOOOOOOO MUCH, to believe this guy deserved death, when it comes to this shop lifting theft? that he was a bully? Well, that bothers me as well....but NOT to the depth that he DESERVED to be killed, as many of you guys seem to think?
The theft should have nothing to do with the way Brown was killed...we need to know what happened at the time of the shooting, and nothing else before that should even come in to the picture imo.
And the cop could very well have been justified, OR NOT? We just don't know yet....
We don't know Brown was shot while running away. We know the witnesses say he was. And we also know that a cop would have to be either crazy, stupid, or somehow mentally disoriented to shoot at a fleeing subject. In fact it is quite naive to presume this cop didn't know what would come of doing what these witnesses are claiming he did.I have read what happened a few times. Trust me, I usually support the cop on these things. My uncle was shot in the line of duty. Brown should have been tased etc., not shot while he was running away.
What the hell is wrong with people who enjoy the idea of 17 year old kids dying?
I'll wager he was high and rushed to cop after a previous altercation. I'll also wager his IQ was low even for his race.I think its funny that he committed strong arm robbery, but then got shot for jay walking. What a fucking dumbass!
Saw that about six hours ago posted on some thread here.Here's a new wrench to throw into the works. Just released:
A Witness Conversation Unknowingly Captured at the Scene of the Ferguson Shooting is a Game-Changer
How did he go about stealing it...he pushed the clerk away...It's not what he stole. It's the way he went about stealing it that offends the civilized mind. And whether or not you can understand that says a great deal about you.This kid stole a box of cigars.
You "Patriots" helped the 1%ers steal the whole fucking middle class.
You talk smack all day about how you needs to have your guns so you can take on the "gummit" when they oppress you.
Shooting a kid in the middle of the street after he surrendered because he stole a $50.00 box of cigars. I can't imagine that being anything but "oppression".
What Michael Brown did was not only unlawful it was absolutely primitive, which is why I have no regret for what happened to him. He was an arrogant bully and the world is better off without him.
Did he pull a knife on him? Did he pull a gun on him? did he punch him in the face? Did he beat the living crap out of him? All things he could have done that would have been horrific....and much worse...but he DID NOT do any of those things....
so what is it that bothers you SOOOOOOOOOOOO MUCH, to believe this guy deserved death, when it comes to this shop lifting theft? that he was a bully? Well, that bothers me as well....but NOT to the depth that he DESERVED to be killed, as many of you guys seem to think?
The theft should have nothing to do with the way Brown was killed...we need to know what happened at the time of the shooting, and nothing else before that should even come in to the picture imo.
And the cop could very well have been justified, OR NOT? We just don't know yet....
Here's a new wrench to throw into the works. Just released:
A Witness Conversation Unknowingly Captured at the Scene of the Ferguson Shooting is a Game-Changer
Here's a new wrench to throw into the works. Just released:
A Witness Conversation Unknowingly Captured at the Scene of the Ferguson Shooting is a Game-Changer
I don't like being lied to. They've been lying to us, trying to paint this as something else.
What makes you think the officer was issued a taser? They pulled all those in Charlotte because they had two deaths from using one in as many years.The problem is, he wasn't stopped for the robbery. Which they have admitted to. He was stopped for walking down the street.
Brown should be in jail, not in the ground.
Why are you leaving out all the details between the time he was stopped and the time he was shot ?
I have read what happened a few times. Trust me, I usually support the cop on these things. My uncle was shot in the line of duty. Brown should have been tased etc., not shot while he was running away.
Brown was not a 17 year-old "kid." Through the eyes of civilized society he was an 18 year-old over-grown bully and a strongarm robber.What the hell is wrong with people who enjoy the idea of 17 year old kids dying?
