Plasmaball
Gold Member
- Sep 9, 2010
- 20,629
- 2,194
- 175
Wow, theres that low information thing kicking in.I haven't lied. You have. The only eye witness saw Zimmerman on the ground with Martin on top of him beating him. Completely consistent with forensic evidence and with Zimmerman's account of what happened.
The fact that you don't want to accept that doesn't make me a liar. But if you told the truth, I'd be surprised.
the only witness thinks he saw someone on top of someone. He didnt know who. Great! Martin beat up Zimmerman, You still have ZERO proof Martin jumped Zimmerman...
I know this is a difficult thing to understand. Facts...
The truth is something you are not familiar with based on what you've posted.
The truth about Zimmerman is that he he followed the guy, called the police, Instead of waiting he followed somemore, ( which he had the legal right to do. ) Then something happened,Martin most likely got the upper hand, Zimmerman panicked because he feared for his life because he got in over his head, and shot the guy. Which given the current law is perfectly legal in Florida. Furthermore there was no evidence to conflict with Zimmerman because the only other real witness was dead. So therefore based on the evidence given, Zimmerman was let go. Which was the right call.
those are the facts...Nothing more, and nothing less. Everything else is your pathetic attempt to Bullshit your dumbass opinion on the matter. someday you will realize you are really this stupid. Well i hope someday.
You lef tout that Martin was on top of Zimmerman. You left out that Martin was bashing Zimmerman's head on the pavement. Those are sort of crucial when deciding whether someone was in fear of his life or not.
You also left out that Martin had a history of robbibg houses and was acting suspiciously, like he was casing houses to rob. That isnt material to Zimmerman's guilt or innocence--he was clearly innocent. But it adds context.
Then something happened,Martin most likely got the upper hand,
no i just didnt go into amazingly great detail either. I said martin got the upperhand.......why am i explaining this to you?
The rest about him stealing is irrelevant to the case of Martin Vs zimmerman.
I mean you are also leaving out the fact Zimmerman had issues with the cops as well. Both are irrelevant to the case and are only used by bottom feeders who can't argue the actual facts.
So seriously stop trying to act like you are some Proponent of speaking the truth. You aren't. You are a partisan lair just like Avatar.