Michael Cohen could and should be disbarred if he violates client privilege

[playtime]

Being disbarred is the least of what Cohen is facing.

I don't think John Dean ever practiced law again.

How in the fuck would a dipshit like you have the faintest idea of what Cohen is facing ? Repeating of bullshit that you know nothing about again??

Heck, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out he's looking at serious charges. Cohen played a key role in the partially unverified, partially corroborated but not at all debunked Steele Dossier.

He "played a part in it?" You mean he was a target of the thoroughly discredited dossier? Hillary playe a far biigger part in creatning If anyone should be facing charges it's her.

You Trump hatng douchbags are a bunch of despicable irrational pieces of shit

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Discredited by who? Link to the discrediting.

It was discredited by McCabe, dumbass. He testified that none of it hade been verified. It was also proven that Cohen never went to Prague as the dossier claims.

[...]
The Dossier
The claim:
Republicans assert that officials relied primarily on an unverified dossier prepared by former British spy Christopher Steele to obtain a surveillance warrant on Carter Page, a foreign policy adviser on Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign. “Deputy Director McCabe testified before the committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information,” the memo said, referring to FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who stepped down from that job this week.

Why it would matter:
Republicans on the House Intelligence panel say the investigation into possible collusion between Trump associates and Russia is tainted because it was instigated amid anti-Trump bias in the Justice Department and the FBI during the Obama administration. A key question is what evidence was used to secure warrants from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court resulting in wiretaps on Trump associates, including Page. The Steele dossier is filled with unverified allegations about Trump’s connections to Russia, some of them salacious.

Is it true?
The FISA warrant concerning Page remains classified, but warrant applications are lengthy documents that often run 60 to 80 pages where officials need to show “probable cause” that the target is a foreign power or an agent of one. Obtaining a FISA warrant to spy on a U.S. citizen requires multiple levels of review that on average involves 10 government officials, according to a former U.S. national security official. Democrats on the House Intelligence panel issued a statement Friday saying “the investigation would persist on the basis of wholly independent evidence had Christopher Steele never entered the picture.”

Representative Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said Friday that the Republicans “cherry-picked” information from McCabe’s testimony, leaving out what he said about the “genesis of the investigation that did not involve the dossier.” Page -- who denies wrongdoing and said he welcomes release of the memo -- was on the FBI’s radar long before the dossier: In 2013, Russian spies tried to recruit him, according to an FBI criminal complaint filed in 2015.
[...]

Terms of Service Violation


[...]
Accuses Republicans of misquoting testimony

What McCabe did or did not say during a closed-door congressional hearing has been a key source of controversy between Republicans and Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee — and now McCabe is weighing in.

McCabe sided with the Democrats’ version of his testimony, which was recounted in a memo that House Intelligence Democrats released in February to counter one released by Republicans on the panel a few weeks prior.

Republicans insisted that McCabe testified to the committee that unverified material supplied by the so-called Steele dossier was integral to the FBI securing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, arguing that helped prompt the ongoing federal probe into Russia's attempts to influence the 2016 election.

Democrats said McCabe did not claim the FISA application depended on the dossier, which McCabe now corroborates.

"We started the investigations without the dossier. We were proceeding with the investigations before we ever received that information," McCabe told CNN. "Was the dossier material important to the package? Of course, it was. As was every fact included in that package. Was it the majority of what was in the package? Absolutely not."

5 claims McCabe made after being fired

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I don't believe attorney-client privilege is limitless.

 

[playtime]

bripat9643

Sources: Mueller has evidence Cohen was in Prague in 2016, confirming part of dossier
By Peter Stone And Greg Gordon
April 13, 2018 06:08 PM

[...]

But investigators have traced evidence that Cohen entered the Czech Republic through Germany, apparently during August or early September of 2016 as the ex-spy reported, said the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation is confidential. He wouldn’t have needed a passport for such a trip, because both countries are in the so-called Schengen Area in which 26 nations operate with open borders. The disclosure still left a puzzle: The sources did not say whether Cohen took a commercial flight or private jet to Europe, and gave no explanation as to why no record of such a trip has surfaced.
[...]
Sources: Mueller has evidence Cohen was in Prague in 2016, confirming part of dossier

 

[playtime]

 

[Seawytch]

What the hell is a "rocket surgeon"?

An intentional conflating of rocket scientist and brain surgeon. It doesn’t take a brain scientist to figure it out.

 

[Rosy]

LOLOL

There are no boundaries to your ignorance on campaign finance laws.

No, it does not have to be campaign funds to be illegal. Anything of value to the campaign must be reported, even if the funds come from the candidate.

He knows, he's just doing the loyal tRumpkin thing and turning a blind eye.

True you are turning a blind eye to the 150 million that Putin donated to Hillaries charity

For rosie's edification
CFIUS is comprised of representatives of nine government agencies, including Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, which Clinton headed from 2009 to 2013. The deal was approved, and Clinton could have objected, but officials privy to the deal have repeatedly stated that Clinton and other secretaries of state typically did not delve into CFIUS deals, which are usually handled below the top levels.

The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?

Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.

All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.

Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.

Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for Billary

Yawning

You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.

Actually the charity recorded and reported the 150 mill...…………..common knowledge

 

[Faun]

He knows, he's just doing the loyal tRumpkin thing and turning a blind eye.

True you are turning a blind eye to the 150 million that Putin donated to Hillaries charity

For rosie's edification
CFIUS is comprised of representatives of nine government agencies, including Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, which Clinton headed from 2009 to 2013. The deal was approved, and Clinton could have objected, but officials privy to the deal have repeatedly stated that Clinton and other secretaries of state typically did not delve into CFIUS deals, which are usually handled below the top levels.

The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?

Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.

All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.

Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.

Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for Billary

Yawning

You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.

Actually the charity recorded and reported the 150 mill...…………..common knowledge

So?

 

[Rosy]

True you are turning a blind eye to the 150 million that Putin donated to Hillaries charity

For rosie's edification
CFIUS is comprised of representatives of nine government agencies, including Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, which Clinton headed from 2009 to 2013. The deal was approved, and Clinton could have objected, but officials privy to the deal have repeatedly stated that Clinton and other secretaries of state typically did not delve into CFIUS deals, which are usually handled below the top levels.

The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?

Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.

All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.

Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.

Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for Billary

Yawning

You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.

Actually the charity recorded and reported the 150 mill...…………..common knowledge

So?

So you are wrong as usual

 

[Faun]

For rosie's edification
CFIUS is comprised of representatives of nine government agencies, including Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, which Clinton headed from 2009 to 2013. The deal was approved, and Clinton could have objected, but officials privy to the deal have repeatedly stated that Clinton and other secretaries of state typically did not delve into CFIUS deals, which are usually handled below the top levels.

The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?

Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.

All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.

Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.

Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for Billary

Yawning

You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.

Actually the charity recorded and reported the 150 mill...…………..common knowledge

So?

So you are wrong as usual

Where was I wrong??

 

[Rosy]

Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for Billary

Yawning

You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.

Actually the charity recorded and reported the 150 mill...…………..common knowledge

So?

So you are wrong as usual

Where was I wrong??

You are asking me to read your gibberish...

whaaaaaàaàaaaa

 

[Faun]

You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.

Actually the charity recorded and reported the 150 mill...…………..common knowledge

So?

So you are wrong as usual

Where was I wrong??

You are asking me to read your gibberish...

whaaaaaàaàaaaa

No, I’m challenging you to understand what I posted. Seems you can’t.

 

[Rosy]

Actually the charity recorded and reported the 150 mill...…………..common knowledge

So?

So you are wrong as usual

Where was I wrong??

You are asking me to read your gibberish...

whaaaaaàaàaaaa

No, I’m challenging you to understand what I posted. Seems you can’t.

True I will never understand why people fight to kill their own babies or any of your schizzo rantings

 

[Faun]

So?

So you are wrong as usual

Where was I wrong??

You are asking me to read your gibberish...

whaaaaaàaàaaaa

No, I’m challenging you to understand what I posted. Seems you can’t.

True I will never understand why people fight to kill their own babies or any of your schizzo rantings

LOLOL

This is what you call “gibberish” and a “schizzo rant”...

Faun: ”Hillary never got $150 million from Russia.”​

You’re such an imbecile, you admit you don’t understand that.

 

[Rosy]

So you are wrong as usual

Where was I wrong??

You are asking me to read your gibberish...

whaaaaaàaàaaaa

No, I’m challenging you to understand what I posted. Seems you can’t.

True I will never understand why people fight to kill their own babies or any of your schizzo rantings

LOLOL

This is what you call “gibberish” and a “schizzo rant”...

Faun: ”Hillary never got $150 million from Russia.”​

You’re such an imbecile, you admit you don’t understand that.

So the liberal NY times article is not real in your mental world

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

 

[Crepitus]

He knows, he's just doing the loyal tRumpkin thing and turning a blind eye.

True you are turning a blind eye to the 150 million that Putin donated to Hillaries charity

For rosie's edification
CFIUS is comprised of representatives of nine government agencies, including Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, which Clinton headed from 2009 to 2013. The deal was approved, and Clinton could have objected, but officials privy to the deal have repeatedly stated that Clinton and other secretaries of state typically did not delve into CFIUS deals, which are usually handled below the top levels.

The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?

Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.

All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.

Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.

Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for Billary

Yawning

You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.

Actually the charity recorded and reported the 150 mill...…………..common knowledge

The source dimwit. The source of the funds was not "Russia".

 

[Rosy]

True you are turning a blind eye to the 150 million that Putin donated to Hillaries charity

For rosie's edification
CFIUS is comprised of representatives of nine government agencies, including Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, which Clinton headed from 2009 to 2013. The deal was approved, and Clinton could have objected, but officials privy to the deal have repeatedly stated that Clinton and other secretaries of state typically did not delve into CFIUS deals, which are usually handled below the top levels.

The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?

Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.

All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.

Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.

Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for Billary

Yawning

You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.

Actually the charity recorded and reported the 150 mill...…………..common knowledge

The source dimwit. The source of the funds was not "Russia".

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

 

[Crepitus]

For rosie's edification
CFIUS is comprised of representatives of nine government agencies, including Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, which Clinton headed from 2009 to 2013. The deal was approved, and Clinton could have objected, but officials privy to the deal have repeatedly stated that Clinton and other secretaries of state typically did not delve into CFIUS deals, which are usually handled below the top levels.

The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?

Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.

All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.

Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.

Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for Billary

Yawning

You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.

Actually the charity recorded and reported the 150 mill...…………..common knowledge

The source dimwit. The source of the funds was not "Russia".

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

Lol, debunked nonsense.

It didn't happen. Get that through your head. It's fake. Repeating it won't change that.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

Fox News's Shepard Smith debunks his network's favorite Hillary Clinton 'scandal,' infuriates viewers

This simple chart debunks the conspiracy theory that Hillary Clinton sold uranium to Russia

The Facts on Uranium One - FactCheck.org

How many more would you like?

 

[Faun]

Where was I wrong??

You are asking me to read your gibberish...

whaaaaaàaàaaaa

No, I’m challenging you to understand what I posted. Seems you can’t.

True I will never understand why people fight to kill their own babies or any of your schizzo rantings

LOLOL

This is what you call “gibberish” and a “schizzo rant”...

Faun: ”Hillary never got $150 million from Russia.”​

You’re such an imbecile, you admit you don’t understand that.

So the liberal NY times article is not real in your mental world

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

Thanks for proving you’re an imbecile as nothing in that article states Russia gave Hillary $150 million.

 

[edward37]

You are asking me to read your gibberish...

whaaaaaàaàaaaa

No, I’m challenging you to understand what I posted. Seems you can’t.

True I will never understand why people fight to kill their own babies or any of your schizzo rantings

LOLOL

This is what you call “gibberish” and a “schizzo rant”...

Faun: ”Hillary never got $150 million from Russia.”​

You’re such an imbecile, you admit you don’t understand that.

So the liberal NY times article is not real in your mental world

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

Thanks for proving you’re an imbecile as nothing in that article states Russia gave Hillary $150 million.

Why is it they believe all the crap thrown at them by their republican mouth pieces? they can't all be morons ,,Can they?

 

[bodecea]

Being disbarred is the least of what Cohen is facing.

I don't think John Dean ever practiced law again.

How in the fuck would a dipshit like you have the faintest idea of what Cohen is facing ? Repeating of bullshit that you know nothing about again??

Heck, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out he's looking at serious charges. Cohen played a key role in the partially unverified, partially corroborated but not at all debunked Steele Dossier.

That's Comey, not Cohen you stupid libtard!

Retard, when was Comey's office raided? I must've missed that.

Comey was fired when he wasn't in the office...... so no "raiding" was required.

That's right....coward trump couldn't face him. Probably a side-affect of such tiny hands.