Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
So Kaz...which do you agree with, raising the age of consent to 18 in the UK or did you like that there were different ages of consent for gays and straights? Was that more in line with your "values"?
Wassa matter? Got busted and don't want to admit it? Which do you favor Kaz, different age of consent for gays and straights, same age of consent? Sex only for procreation?
I see, you put the egg timer on and it's my responsibility to answer before it runs out. More of your crap.
I answered the question the OP asked, where would Bachmann get such an idea. I don't perscribe to the liberal theory that facts are introduced or ignored based on the position being argued. It was a factual answer.
As for your question, I have informed you that as long as you take whatever I say as I'm a Christian, Republican homophobe, I'm not discussing the issue with you other than telling you what you already hear. If you want to discuss anything with me, you have to process what I say. I was actually serious about that and have consistently implemented it for some time now. I can't comprehend that for you, but I can explain it to you again.
I see, you put the egg timer on and it's my responsibility to answer before it runs out. More of your crap.
I answered the question the OP asked, where would Bachmann get such an idea. I don't perscribe to the liberal theory that facts are introduced or ignored based on the position being argued. It was a factual answer.
However I am curious also....so you think it was acceptable for the UK to have a different age limit for gays than they did for heteros?
I see absolutely no rational reason to have different laws for heterosexual and homosexual sex other than Christian anti-gay efforts.
See, that wasn't so hard was it? Good for you!
I see, you put the egg timer on and it's my responsibility to answer before it runs out. More of your crap.
I answered the question the OP asked, where would Bachmann get such an idea. I don't perscribe to the liberal theory that facts are introduced or ignored based on the position being argued. It was a factual answer.
However I am curious also....so you think it was acceptable for the UK to have a different age limit for gays than they did for heteros?
I see absolutely no rational reason to have different laws for heterosexual and homosexual sex other than Christian anti-gay efforts, which I oppose unless I'm talking to Seawytch because she won't process what I say so I just tell her what she already hears.
Wassa matter? Got busted and don't want to admit it? Which do you favor Kaz, different age of consent for gays and straights, same age of consent? Sex only for procreation?
I see, you put the egg timer on and it's my responsibility to answer before it runs out. More of your crap.
I answered the question the OP asked, where would Bachmann get such an idea. I don't perscribe to the liberal theory that facts are introduced or ignored based on the position being argued. It was a factual answer.
As for your question, I have informed you that as long as you take whatever I say as I'm a Christian, Republican homophobe, I'm not discussing the issue with you other than telling you what you already hear. If you want to discuss anything with me, you have to process what I say. I was actually serious about that and have consistently implemented it for some time now. I can't comprehend that for you, but I can explain it to you again.
So you were saying Bachmann was ill informed? Were YOU aware that the age of consent was changed to align with the age of consent for heterosexual sex when you posted that link? Which do you support? You think I'm a fascist liberal Chritianaphobe and I told you I think it should be 18 across the board, Federal law. You?
However I am curious also....so you think it was acceptable for the UK to have a different age limit for gays than they did for heteros?
I see absolutely no rational reason to have different laws for heterosexual and homosexual sex other than Christian anti-gay efforts.
However I am curious also....so you think it was acceptable for the UK to have a different age limit for gays than they did for heteros?
I see absolutely no rational reason to have different laws for heterosexual and homosexual sex other than Christian anti-gay efforts, which I oppose unless I'm talking to Seawytch because she won't process what I say so I just tell her what she already hears.
Ok, let's see if we agree on this. I think the age should be 18 for both gays and straights....not 16...but they SHOULD be equal. What say you?
I see absolutely no rational reason to have different laws for heterosexual and homosexual sex other than Christian anti-gay efforts, which I oppose unless I'm talking to Seawytch because she won't process what I say so I just tell her what she already hears.
Ok, let's see if we agree on this. I think the age should be 18 for both gays and straights....not 16...but they SHOULD be equal. What say you?
I don't have a strong opinion on the age of consent, but my off the cuff answer would be that sex between various ages under 18 is State law, I don't know enough. I can't see making sex between 17 and 18 illegal, kids can be in the same grade. And beyond that, I'm with you. Only consenting adults, no adult/child sex. And as we discussed, gay or straight is irrelevant, it's the same.
Harry Hay... The Grand Marshall of the Long Beach Gay Pride Parade in 1986...
He's well known for not going Against NAMBLA even though it had become popular to distance themselves from NAMBLA for Political Reasons in the late 80's and early 90's.
NAMBLA Walks With Me <--- Yep, he didn't turn his back on the Pedo's like many who had Marched with them for years before were.
The Sympathies are still there... The Alliance will return. First things first though, right?...
peace...
"When questioned on his (Harry Hay) support for NAMBLA in a 1983 New York University forum, he remarked "If the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what thirteen-, fourteen-, and fifteen-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world", highlighting his own relationship with an adult man when he was 14."
It's a Cycle of Abuse and one of the Gay Movement's Leaders during the Struggle couldn't be a better example.
peace...
Ok, let's see if we agree on this. I think the age should be 18 for both gays and straights....not 16...but they SHOULD be equal. What say you?
I don't have a strong opinion on the age of consent, but my off the cuff answer would be that sex between various ages under 18 is State law, I don't know enough. I can't see making sex between 17 and 18 illegal, kids can be in the same grade. And beyond that, I'm with you. Only consenting adults, no adult/child sex. And as we discussed, gay or straight is irrelevant, it's the same.
And that's what the UK law you posted (attributing it to the "gay agenda") did. Glad you agree with the "gay agenda".
I should have added that I support a Federal Age of Consent law set at 18 with "Romeo and Juliet" exemptions.
I don't have a strong opinion on the age of consent, but my off the cuff answer would be that sex between various ages under 18 is State law, I don't know enough. I can't see making sex between 17 and 18 illegal, kids can be in the same grade. And beyond that, I'm with you. Only consenting adults, no adult/child sex. And as we discussed, gay or straight is irrelevant, it's the same.
And that's what the UK law you posted (attributing it to the "gay agenda") did. Glad you agree with the "gay agenda".
I should have added that I support a Federal Age of Consent law set at 18 with "Romeo and Juliet" exemptions.
Yes, the objective of gays is to strike at the pillars of society to join them in their moral depravity. That is why gay sex is an abomination in the 10 commandments and Jesus spoke against it so fervently and frequently. Murder is almost as bad as homosexual fornication.
I don't have a strong opinion on the age of consent, but my off the cuff answer would be that sex between various ages under 18 is State law, I don't know enough. I can't see making sex between 17 and 18 illegal, kids can be in the same grade. And beyond that, I'm with you. Only consenting adults, no adult/child sex. And as we discussed, gay or straight is irrelevant, it's the same.
And that's what the UK law you posted (attributing it to the "gay agenda") did. Glad you agree with the "gay agenda".
I should have added that I support a Federal Age of Consent law set at 18 with "Romeo and Juliet" exemptions.
Yes, the objective of gays is to strike at the pillars of society to join them in their moral depravity. That is why gay sex is an abomination in the 10 commandments and Jesus spoke against it so fervently and frequently. Murder is almost as bad as homosexual fornication.
Half my family is from the South...so, tell us...what ARE the ages of consent in the Southern states? Lots of 16 year old levels...at least they are getting away from the 14 year old mark. Progress.
The connotation you gave was far more than that. I've lived in the south for about 10 years, 2 in Georgia, 8 in North Carolina, I didn't know anyone married at those ages. Once again it's your assumption that if we don't ban something legally that means we are in favor of it.
Learn your history of the South and what it used to be like...particularly in the mountains. Just look at whats-his-name from Duck Dynasty and how old his wife was when they married....Elvis Presley....Jerry Lee Lewis....Loretta Lynn...this was not unusual in the South in particular.
Don't you know Duck Dynasty is a show for Yankees, OMG!
Edit
Wassa matter? Got busted and don't want to admit it? Which do you favor Kaz, different age of consent for gays and straights, same age of consent? Sex only for procreation?
I see, you put the egg timer on and it's my responsibility to answer before it runs out. More of your crap.
I answered the question the OP asked, where would Bachmann get such an idea. I don't perscribe to the liberal theory that facts are introduced or ignored based on the position being argued. It was a factual answer.
As for your question, I have informed you that as long as you take whatever I say as I'm a Christian, Republican homophobe, I'm not discussing the issue with you other than telling you what you already hear. If you want to discuss anything with me, you have to process what I say. I was actually serious about that and have consistently implemented it for some time now. I can't comprehend that for you, but I can explain it to you again.
So you were saying Bachmann was ill informed? Were YOU aware that the age of consent was changed to align with the age of consent for heterosexual sex when you posted that link? Which do you support? You think I'm a fascist liberal Chritianaphobe and I told you I think it should be 18 across the board, Federal law. You?
I don't have a strong opinion on the age of consent, but my off the cuff answer would be that sex between various ages under 18 is State law, I don't know enough. I can't see making sex between 17 and 18 illegal, kids can be in the same grade. And beyond that, I'm with you. Only consenting adults, no adult/child sex. And as we discussed, gay or straight is irrelevant, it's the same.
And that's what the UK law you posted (attributing it to the "gay agenda") did. Glad you agree with the "gay agenda".
I should have added that I support a Federal Age of Consent law set at 18 with "Romeo and Juliet" exemptions.
Yes, the objective of gays is to strike at the pillars of society to join them in their moral depravity. That is why gay sex is an abomination in the 10 commandments and Jesus spoke against it so fervently and frequently. Murder is almost as bad as homosexual fornication.
Please pay attention to what I said....I was referring to the guy from Duck Dynasty...didn't he marry his wife when she was 14 and he in his 20s?The connotation you gave was far more than that. I've lived in the south for about 10 years, 2 in Georgia, 8 in North Carolina, I didn't know anyone married at those ages. Once again it's your assumption that if we don't ban something legally that means we are in favor of it.
Learn your history of the South and what it used to be like...particularly in the mountains. Just look at whats-his-name from Duck Dynasty and how old his wife was when they married....Elvis Presley....Jerry Lee Lewis....Loretta Lynn...this was not unusual in the South in particular.
OMG! you get your ideas about the south from the tv and movies!
You really should get out more, you know, outside, there is a big old world, outside, it's green and blue, outside, there are actual people to talk to, OUTSIDE!
Please pay attention to what I said....I was referring to the guy from Duck Dynasty...didn't he marry his wife when she was 14 and he in his 20s?Learn your history of the South and what it used to be like...particularly in the mountains. Just look at whats-his-name from Duck Dynasty and how old his wife was when they married....Elvis Presley....Jerry Lee Lewis....Loretta Lynn...this was not unusual in the South in particular.
OMG! you get your ideas about the south from the tv and movies!
You really should get out more, you know, outside, there is a big old world, outside, it's green and blue, outside, there are actual people to talk to, OUTSIDE!
