Millions of dollars spent to charge 12 Ruskies with crimes that they will NEVER be convicted of.

You said Obama did nothing. I was replying to that lie.
I said he told them to "cut it out". That's what he said he did.
If you want to know what sanctions Trump hasn’t imposed, you can google them.
What do you care? I wasn't asking you.

Oh, then let me follow up. Your lazy and incurious. Better?
Not the least bit curious. And it's "you're", not "your". That's lazy.

Of course you're not curious, you could care less.
Are you the least bit curious to know if Obama and the Hillary campaign paid for a fake dossier and used it to get a FISA warrant to spy on Trump? Does it bother you that they didn't inform the judge that they paid for it? That's what I thought.
 
Turned up nothing? Tell that to the families of the 4 people who were killed because of Hillary's incompetence.
Yeah, turned up nothing. Is Hillary in jail? Nothing. Was Obama’s impeached over it? Nothing.
I think you know that when the traitors in the FBI are all uncovered and purged, and there's no one there to protect Hillary, she will be brought to justice.


nobody is protecting hillary - shes going to prison any day now, ANY DAY NOW

ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW


now click your ruby slippers together 3 times ...

:abgg2q.jpg:
Says the idiot who still thinks Trump colluded with the Russians to "steal" the election from Hillary (like she was entitled to it).



quote me colon breath ..
Not inclined to jump through hoops to prove you're a liar. Everyone already knows it. But if you want to prove you're not, you could always quote a post of you saying Trump DIDN'T collude with the Russians.
 
Turned up nothing? Tell that to the families of the 4 people who were killed because of Hillary's incompetence.
Yeah, turned up nothing. Is Hillary in jail? Nothing. Was Obama’s impeached over it? Nothing.
I think you know that when the traitors in the FBI are all uncovered and purged, and there's no one there to protect Hillary, she will be brought to justice.


nobody is protecting hillary - shes going to prison any day now, ANY DAY NOW

ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW


now click your ruby slippers together 3 times ...

:abgg2q.jpg:
Says the idiot who still thinks Trump colluded with the Russians to "steal" the election from Hillary (like she was entitled to it).


Why is he blocking the investigation at every turn? Why is he defending Putin even as his cabinet members say otherwise? Why won't he implement sanctions against Russia.
Tell us, Mr. Single digit IQ, how exactly is he blocking the investigation at ANY turn, let alone EVERY turn? Go ahead, this should be good.
 
You said Obama did nothing. I was replying to that lie.
I said he told them to "cut it out". That's what he said he did.
If you want to know what sanctions Trump hasn’t imposed, you can google them.
What do you care? I wasn't asking you.

Oh, then let me follow up. Your lazy and incurious. Better?
Not the least bit curious. And it's "you're", not "your". That's lazy.

Of course you're not curious, you could care less.
Are you the least bit curious to know if Obama and the Hillary campaign paid for a fake dossier and used it to get a FISA warrant to spy on Trump? Does it bother you that they didn't inform the judge that they paid for it? That's what I thought.
no one paid for a fake dossier.... if you believe that crud then I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you! AND there is NO EVIDENCE what so ever, that supports that made up, right wing lie..... :rolleyes:
 
Nothing will come of it. They won't be extradited or ever see the inside of a US courtroom much less one of our jails.

Was it worth it?
Yes, it was definitely worth it...even if that much money, but so you know...it has NOT been spent on this small small portion of the russian Investigation exposed on Friday...

It's worth it, because they broke the Law and should be charged like everyone else who intentionally breaks the law, they committed ESPIONAGE and you think they should not be charged???

Second, this restricts these Russian's movement throughout the world....they will never be able to do business with us or with any of our allies, they will not be allowed to travel here, or to any of our ally countries for fear of being extradited or simply captured.....and they will not be able to do business with our allies, Russian love the western world that we live in......no one there who is rich in Russia wants to stay there and have no movement or the ability to buy our goods...

And it spelled out, in this small particular case, how in depth they were willing to go to mask themselves as Americans so to cause even more division among us and being aware of such practices help us, be more aware of their tactics....

Twiddling our thumbs is NOT an option.


Funny how those who said nothing when Trey Gowdy went on for two F-ing years at a cost of tens of millions on the NINTH Benghazi investigation --- are suddenly impatient with Mueller after a lousy 9 months.
And when Gowdy was done, NOT even ONE Indictment, let alone 12 plus 4 others in 9 months, not 2 years...with Gowdy....and 4 years for all of the Republican Hillary/Benghazi/email investigations with again, ZERO indictments..... sheesh.. :rolleyes:
Congress can't indict anyone, shit for brains.
Correct.... they personally do not indict, what they do on anything in their investigation that they see as criminal... is send over a recommendation to the Justice department for an indictment, and Justice then does their own investigation, and indicts the person, if the law has actually been broken.

So the Obama administration was the only party that could have indicted Hillary.

Now what do you suppose the odds of that happening were?
 
I said he told them to "cut it out". That's what he said he did.
What do you care? I wasn't asking you.

Oh, then let me follow up. Your lazy and incurious. Better?
Not the least bit curious. And it's "you're", not "your". That's lazy.

Of course you're not curious, you could care less.
Are you the least bit curious to know if Obama and the Hillary campaign paid for a fake dossier and used it to get a FISA warrant to spy on Trump? Does it bother you that they didn't inform the judge that they paid for it? That's what I thought.
no one paid for a fake dossier.... if you believe that crud then I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you! AND there is NO EVIDENCE what so ever, that supports that made up, right wing lie..... :rolleyes:

WE already know that Hillary paid for it.

Who do you think you're fooling?
 
I said he told them to "cut it out". That's what he said he did.
What do you care? I wasn't asking you.

Oh, then let me follow up. Your lazy and incurious. Better?
Not the least bit curious. And it's "you're", not "your". That's lazy.

Of course you're not curious, you could care less.
Are you the least bit curious to know if Obama and the Hillary campaign paid for a fake dossier and used it to get a FISA warrant to spy on Trump? Does it bother you that they didn't inform the judge that they paid for it? That's what I thought.
no one paid for a fake dossier.... if you believe that crud then I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you! AND there is NO EVIDENCE what so ever, that supports that made up, right wing lie..... :rolleyes:
Wow, you're really in denial, aren't you? Where have you been for the past year? The dossier was paid for by the Clinton campaign and it contained false information. It was used to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on Trump. This isn't even in dispute (except maybe by some of the leftist lunatics on this board).
 
You said Obama did nothing. I was replying to that lie.
I said he told them to "cut it out". That's what he said he did.
If you want to know what sanctions Trump hasn’t imposed, you can google them.
What do you care? I wasn't asking you.

Oh, then let me follow up. Your lazy and incurious. Better?
Not the least bit curious. And it's "you're", not "your". That's lazy.

Of course you're not curious, you could care less.
Are you the least bit curious to know if Obama and the Hillary campaign paid for a fake dossier and used it to get a FISA warrant to spy on Trump? Does it bother you that they didn't inform the judge that they paid for it? That's what I thought.

Jesus, dude, what does the 'fake' dossier have to do with Trump not enforcing sanctions that had a veto proof majority? Talk about desperate.
 
Yes, it was definitely worth it...even if that much money, but so you know...it has NOT been spent on this small small portion of the russian Investigation exposed on Friday...

It's worth it, because they broke the Law and should be charged like everyone else who intentionally breaks the law, they committed ESPIONAGE and you think they should not be charged???

Second, this restricts these Russian's movement throughout the world....they will never be able to do business with us or with any of our allies, they will not be allowed to travel here, or to any of our ally countries for fear of being extradited or simply captured.....and they will not be able to do business with our allies, Russian love the western world that we live in......no one there who is rich in Russia wants to stay there and have no movement or the ability to buy our goods...

And it spelled out, in this small particular case, how in depth they were willing to go to mask themselves as Americans so to cause even more division among us and being aware of such practices help us, be more aware of their tactics....

Twiddling our thumbs is NOT an option.


Funny how those who said nothing when Trey Gowdy went on for two F-ing years at a cost of tens of millions on the NINTH Benghazi investigation --- are suddenly impatient with Mueller after a lousy 9 months.
And when Gowdy was done, NOT even ONE Indictment, let alone 12 plus 4 others in 9 months, not 2 years...with Gowdy....and 4 years for all of the Republican Hillary/Benghazi/email investigations with again, ZERO indictments..... sheesh.. :rolleyes:
Congress can't indict anyone, shit for brains.
Correct.... they personally do not indict, what they do on anything in their investigation that they see as criminal... is send over a recommendation to the Justice department for an indictment, and Justice then does their own investigation, and indicts the person, if the law has actually been broken.

So the Obama administration was the only party that could have indicted Hillary.

Now what do you suppose the odds of that happening were?

About the same as the DOJ doing that now.
 
Yeah, turned up nothing. Is Hillary in jail? Nothing. Was Obama’s impeached over it? Nothing.
I think you know that when the traitors in the FBI are all uncovered and purged, and there's no one there to protect Hillary, she will be brought to justice.


nobody is protecting hillary - shes going to prison any day now, ANY DAY NOW

ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW


now click your ruby slippers together 3 times ...

:abgg2q.jpg:
Says the idiot who still thinks Trump colluded with the Russians to "steal" the election from Hillary (like she was entitled to it).


Why is he blocking the investigation at every turn? Why is he defending Putin even as his cabinet members say otherwise? Why won't he implement sanctions against Russia.
Tell us, Mr. Single digit IQ, how exactly is he blocking the investigation at ANY turn, let alone EVERY turn? Go ahead, this should be good.

Easy one:

How Trump Built an Obstruction of Justice Case Against Himself


Obstruction of justice is a crime that depends on a person’s state of mind, and so is difficult for prosecutors to prove. The law on whether a sitting president can be prosecuted, as opposed to impeached and removed from office by Congress, is unsettled. But legal experts say that Trump’s pattern of behavior has made the case against him much stronger, because that pattern shows Trump repeatedly attempting to undercut the investigations into Russian interference and obstruction, and then in some cases misleading the public about it. That Trump was unsuccessful in firing Mueller is irrelevant—obstruction is a crime whether or not the attempt succeeds.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nixon was an attorney and knew better than to go on national television and state that the reason he was firing someone was to stop the investigation of a crime. Trump....not so much. He is not a trained attorney and he is not even smart, according to a professor from his college.

Answer me this please. Do you think Nixon would have gone on TV everyday and declared that he was innocent and that the whole Watergate investigation was a hoax? No, he didn't. Trump says he is defending himself, when in actuality, he is implicating himself each time he Tweets...."No Collusion!"

What has he got to hide? Mueller has established that there was a crime. The Junior meeting alone tells us that there was collusion. Now, Mueller is putting together the pieces that will either prove there was or there was not an underlying crime. Trump should be concerned.

But I think that what he is really concerned about is the money trail. He and Kushner have had some very shady dealing with foreign governments, including Russia. Mueller is finding that may be the key to this whole criminal effort.
 
Funny how those who said nothing when Trey Gowdy went on for two F-ing years at a cost of tens of millions on the NINTH Benghazi investigation --- are suddenly impatient with Mueller after a lousy 9 months.
And when Gowdy was done, NOT even ONE Indictment, let alone 12 plus 4 others in 9 months, not 2 years...with Gowdy....and 4 years for all of the Republican Hillary/Benghazi/email investigations with again, ZERO indictments..... sheesh.. :rolleyes:
Congress can't indict anyone, shit for brains.
Correct.... they personally do not indict, what they do on anything in their investigation that they see as criminal... is send over a recommendation to the Justice department for an indictment, and Justice then does their own investigation, and indicts the person, if the law has actually been broken.

So the Obama administration was the only party that could have indicted Hillary.

Now what do you suppose the odds of that happening were?

About the same as the DOJ doing that now.
Given Session's complete lack of a spine, you could be right.
 
I said he told them to "cut it out". That's what he said he did.
What do you care? I wasn't asking you.

Oh, then let me follow up. Your lazy and incurious. Better?
Not the least bit curious. And it's "you're", not "your". That's lazy.

Of course you're not curious, you could care less.
Are you the least bit curious to know if Obama and the Hillary campaign paid for a fake dossier and used it to get a FISA warrant to spy on Trump? Does it bother you that they didn't inform the judge that they paid for it? That's what I thought.

Jesus, dude, what does the 'fake' dossier have to do with Trump not enforcing sanctions that had a veto proof majority? Talk about desperate.

He is waiting for instructions from Moscow...which the FBI will be monitoring.
 
I think you know that when the traitors in the FBI are all uncovered and purged, and there's no one there to protect Hillary, she will be brought to justice.


nobody is protecting hillary - shes going to prison any day now, ANY DAY NOW

ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW
ANY DAY NOW


now click your ruby slippers together 3 times ...

:abgg2q.jpg:
Says the idiot who still thinks Trump colluded with the Russians to "steal" the election from Hillary (like she was entitled to it).


Why is he blocking the investigation at every turn? Why is he defending Putin even as his cabinet members say otherwise? Why won't he implement sanctions against Russia.
Tell us, Mr. Single digit IQ, how exactly is he blocking the investigation at ANY turn, let alone EVERY turn? Go ahead, this should be good.

Easy one:

How Trump Built an Obstruction of Justice Case Against Himself


Obstruction of justice is a crime that depends on a person’s state of mind, and so is difficult for prosecutors to prove. The law on whether a sitting president can be prosecuted, as opposed to impeached and removed from office by Congress, is unsettled. But legal experts say that Trump’s pattern of behavior has made the case against him much stronger, because that pattern shows Trump repeatedly attempting to undercut the investigations into Russian interference and obstruction, and then in some cases misleading the public about it. That Trump was unsuccessful in firing Mueller is irrelevant—obstruction is a crime whether or not the attempt succeeds.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nixon was an attorney and knew better than to go on national television and state that the reason he was firing someone was to stop the investigation of a crime. Trump....not so much. He is not a trained attorney and he is not even smart, according to a professor from his college.

Answer me this please. Do you think Nixon would have gone on TV everyday and declared that he was innocent and that the whole Watergate investigation was a hoax? No, he didn't. Trump says he is defending himself, when in actuality, he is implicating himself each time he Tweets...."No Collusion!"

What has he got to hide? Mueller has established that there was a crime. The Junior meeting alone tells us that there was collusion. Now, Mueller is putting together the pieces that will either prove there was or there was not an underlying crime. Trump should be concerned.

But I think that what he is really concerned about is the money trail. He and Kushner have had some very shady dealing with foreign governments, including Russia. Mueller is finding that may be the key to this whole criminal effort.

It's never going to happen, moron. Quit posting your mastabatory fantasies in a public forum. It makes people uncomfortable.
 
And when Gowdy was done, NOT even ONE Indictment, let alone 12 plus 4 others in 9 months, not 2 years...with Gowdy....and 4 years for all of the Republican Hillary/Benghazi/email investigations with again, ZERO indictments..... sheesh.. :rolleyes:
Congress can't indict anyone, shit for brains.
Correct.... they personally do not indict, what they do on anything in their investigation that they see as criminal... is send over a recommendation to the Justice department for an indictment, and Justice then does their own investigation, and indicts the person, if the law has actually been broken.

So the Obama administration was the only party that could have indicted Hillary.

Now what do you suppose the odds of that happening were?

About the same as the DOJ doing that now.
Given Session's complete lack of a spine, you could be right.

Sure bub, that's the reason.
 
Oh, then let me follow up. Your lazy and incurious. Better?
Not the least bit curious. And it's "you're", not "your". That's lazy.

Of course you're not curious, you could care less.
Are you the least bit curious to know if Obama and the Hillary campaign paid for a fake dossier and used it to get a FISA warrant to spy on Trump? Does it bother you that they didn't inform the judge that they paid for it? That's what I thought.

Jesus, dude, what does the 'fake' dossier have to do with Trump not enforcing sanctions that had a veto proof majority? Talk about desperate.

He is waiting for instructions from Moscow...which the FBI will be monitoring.

Actually I think the Russian trolls are probably better informed than this dink.
 
But I think that what he is really concerned about is the money trail. He and Kushner have had some very shady dealing with foreign governments
Specifically, investments in property at 666 Fifth Avenue, NY, NY.
 
I said he told them to "cut it out". That's what he said he did.
What do you care? I wasn't asking you.

Oh, then let me follow up. Your lazy and incurious. Better?
Not the least bit curious. And it's "you're", not "your". That's lazy.

Of course you're not curious, you could care less.
Are you the least bit curious to know if Obama and the Hillary campaign paid for a fake dossier and used it to get a FISA warrant to spy on Trump? Does it bother you that they didn't inform the judge that they paid for it? That's what I thought.

Jesus, dude, what does the 'fake' dossier have to do with Trump not enforcing sanctions that had a veto proof majority? Talk about desperate.
I didn't say it had anything to do with sanctions. I'm addressing your blatant hypocrisy. You're not very quick, are you?
 
Oh, then let me follow up. Your lazy and incurious. Better?
Not the least bit curious. And it's "you're", not "your". That's lazy.

Of course you're not curious, you could care less.
Are you the least bit curious to know if Obama and the Hillary campaign paid for a fake dossier and used it to get a FISA warrant to spy on Trump? Does it bother you that they didn't inform the judge that they paid for it? That's what I thought.

Jesus, dude, what does the 'fake' dossier have to do with Trump not enforcing sanctions that had a veto proof majority? Talk about desperate.
I didn't say it had anything to do with sanctions. I'm addressing your blatant hypocrisy. You're not very quick, are you?

You're going off topic is what you're doing, changing the subject because you don't want to talk about Trump not letting the Russians off the hook. You couldn't be more obvious.
 
920x920.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top